World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 37 6897 6388 2409 2133 216 4942

Tarek Abdoun publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tarek Abdoun between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tarek Abdoun published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2017. 6 of the 272 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2017. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

272 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tarek Abdoun: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 11
2003 6
2004 7
2005 10
2006 10
2007 12
2008 11
2009 9
2010 10
2011 12
2012 4
2013 14
2014 15
2015 18
2016 7
2017 24
2018 24
2019 8
2020 15
2021 4
2022 7
2023 7
2024 17
2025 5
2026 1
Total 272
Download as CSV

Tarek Abdoun publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tarek Abdoun sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 216 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292 216
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Tarek Abdoun D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tarek Abdoun sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366 37
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tarek Abdoun is affiliated with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in the United States and conducts research primarily within the field of engineering, focusing extensively on civil and structural engineering. Their scholarly work spans several areas including biomedical engineering, media technology, developmental and educational psychology, and artificial intelligence.

The core topics of research addressed by Abdoun include geotechnical engineering and soil mechanics, geotechnical engineering and underground structures, geotechnical engineering and soil stabilization, structural health monitoring techniques, biomedical and engineering education, educational games and gamification, and experimental learning in engineering.

Their recent papers reflect a focus on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering challenges. Notable publications include:

  • Smart prediction of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading, 2023, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
  • Exploring the Potential of Machine Learning in Stochastic Reliability Modelling for Reinforced Soil Foundations, 2024, Buildings
  • Pore Pressure and Kσ Evaluation at High Overburden Pressure under Field Drainage Conditions. I: Centrifuge Experiments, 2020, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • LEAP-ASIA-2019: Validation of centrifuge experiments and the generalized scaling law on liquefaction-induced lateral spreading, 2022, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
  • Data-driven intelligent modeling of unconfined compressive strength of heavy metal-contaminated soil, 2024, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering

Some of the frequent coauthors who collaborated with Abdoun include Waleed El-Sekelly, Mourad Zeghal, Evangelia Korre, Ricardo Dobry, and Min Ni.

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Geo-Congress 2020, and the 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

Best Publications

  • PILE RESPONSE TO LATERAL SPREADS: CENTRIFUGE MODELING

    Tarek Abdoun;Ricardo Dobry;Thomas D. O’Rourke;S. H. Goh

  • Numerical modeling of liquefaction and comparison with centrifuge tests

    Peter M Byrne;Sung-Sik Park;Michael Beaty;Michael Sharp

  • Factors influencing the behavior of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake faulting

    Tarek H. Abdoun;Da Ha;Michael J. O’Rourke;Michael D. Symans

  • Evaluation of pile foundation response to lateral spreading

    Tarek Abdoun;Ricardo Dobry

  • Centrifuge Modeling of Earthquake Effects on Buried High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipelines Crossing Fault Zones

    Da Ha;Tarek H. Abdoun;Michael J. O’Rourke;Michael D. Symans

  • Stabilization of Liquefiable Soils Using Colloidal Silica Grout

    Patricia M. Gallagher;Patricia M. Gallagher;Patricia M. Gallagher;Ahmet Pamuk;Ahmet Pamuk;Ahmet Pamuk;Tarek Abdoun;Tarek Abdoun;Tarek Abdoun

  • LEAP-GWU-2015 experiment specifications, results, and comparisons

    Bruce L. Kutter;Trevor J. Carey;Takuma Hashimoto;Takuma Hashimoto;Mourad Zeghal

  • Buried high-density polyethylene pipelines subjected to normal and strike-slip faulting — a centrifuge investigation

    Da HaD. Ha;Da HaD. Ha;Tarek H. AbdounT.H. Abdoun;Tarek H. AbdounT.H. Abdoun;Michael J. O’RourkeM.J. O’Rourke;Michael J. O’RourkeM.J. O’Rourke;Michael D. SymansM.D. Symans;Michael D. SymansM.D. Symans

  • Numerical model verification and calibration of George Massey Tunnel using centrifuge models

    Dan Yang;Ernest Naesgaard;Peter M Byrne;Korhan Adalier

  • Tactile pressure sensors for soil-structure interaction assessment.

    Michael C. Palmer;Thomas D. O’Rourke;Nathaniel A. Olson;Tarek Abdoun

  • Numerical Modeling of Buried HDPE Pipelines Subjected to Normal Faulting: A Case Study

    Xiaojian Xie;Michael D. Symans;Michael J. O'Rourke;Tarek H. Abdoun

  • Remediation for buried pipeline systems under permanent ground deformation

    Yun Wook Choo;Tarek H. Abdoun;Michael J. O’Rourke;Da Ha

  • Shape-acceleration measurement device and method

    Lee A. Danisch;Murray S. Lowery-Simpson;Tarek H. Abdoun

  • Effect of Soil Permeability on Centrifuge Modeling of Pile Response to Lateral Spreading

    Lenart González;Lenart González;Tarek Abdoun;Tarek Abdoun;Ricardo Dobry;Ricardo Dobry

  • Geotechnics of pipeline system response to earthquakes

    T. D. O'Rourke;J. M. Jezerski;N. A. Olson;A. L. Bonneau

  • Numerical Modeling of Buried HDPE Pipelines Subjected to Strike-Slip Faulting

    Xiaojian Xie;Michael D. Symans;Michael J. O'Rourke;Tarek H. Abdoun

  • Cyclic Shear Strain Needed for Liquefaction Triggering and Assessment of Overburden Pressure Factor Kσ

    R. Dobry;T. Abdoun

  • New Orleans Levee System Performance during Hurricane Katrina: London Avenue and Orleans Canal South

    Javier Ubilla;Tarek Abdoun;Inthuorn Sasanakul;Michael Sharp

  • Centrifuge and Large-Scale Modeling of Seismic Pore Pressures in Sands: Cyclic Strain Interpretation

    T. Abdoun;M. A. Gonzalez;S. Thevanayagam;R. Dobry

  • Liquefaction experiment and analysis projects (LEAP): Summary of observations from the planning phase

    Majid T. Manzari;Mohamed El Ghoraiby;Bruce L. Kutter;Mourad Zeghal

  • Mechanics of Lateral Spreading Observed in a Full-Scale Shake Test

    R. Dobry;S. Thevanayagam;C. Medina;R. Bethapudi

  • Liquefaction Centrifuge Modeling of Sands of Different Permeability

    Michael K. Sharp;Ricardo Dobry;Tarek Abdoun

Frequent Co-Authors

Ricardo Dobry
Ricardo Dobry Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Thomas D. O’Rourke
Thomas D. O’Rourke Cornell University
Ahmed Elgamal
Ahmed Elgamal University of California, San Diego
Bruce L. Kutter
Bruce L. Kutter University of California, Davis
Kohji Tokimatsu
Kohji Tokimatsu Tokyo Institute of Technology
Jacob Fish
Jacob Fish Columbia University
Mark S. Shephard
Mark S. Shephard Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Ross W. Boulanger
Ross W. Boulanger University of California, Davis
Karen J. Mitchell
Karen J. Mitchell West Chester University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths, but many students also explore complementary fields through online education. For those interested in leadership and organizational roles, exploring online human resource management masters programs can provide crucial skills in managing teams and projects effectively.

Online education’s flexibility also benefits mature learners. Seniors looking to advance or pivot their careers might find a one year degree for seniors an ideal option, offering accelerated learning paths without the usual time commitment.

Additionally, degrees like the Master of Library and Information Science (MLIS) connect well with Earth Science through data management and information curation. The value of such programs is explored in is a masters in library science worth it, while those seeking quality assurance should consider ala mlis programs that meet accreditation standards.

Overall, complementing an Earth Science education with related online degrees broadens career opportunities and hones interdisciplinary skills critical in today’s evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Tarek Abdoun

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles