World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
52
Citations
10320
World Ranking
3629
National Ranking
1063

Ahmed Elgamal publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmed Elgamal sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 244 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ahmed Elgamal D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmed Elgamal sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ahmed Elgamal is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their primary field of study is Engineering, with a significant focus on Civil and Structural Engineering. Additional subfields include Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Ocean Engineering, Computational Mechanics, and Building and Construction.

Their research work emphasizes topics such as Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures, Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics, and Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization. Other areas covered include Seismic Performance and Analysis, Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis, Drilling and Well Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions.

Ahmed Elgamal has contributed publications in various journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
  • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
  • Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Selected recent papers authored or jointly authored by Ahmed Elgamal include:

  • Large-Scale Shake Table Tests on a Shallow Foundation in Liquefiable Soils, 2020, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Liquefaction-induced lateral load on pile group of wharf system in a sloping stratum: A centrifuge shake-table investigation, 2021, Ocean Engineering
  • Aspects of bridge-ground seismic response and liquefaction-induced deformations, 2020, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
  • Numerical simulations of LEAP centrifuge tests for seismic response of liquefiable sloping ground, 2020, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
  • Seismic response of helical pile groups from shake table experiments, 2021, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Ahmed Elgamal frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable co-authors include:

  • Zhijian Qiu
  • Athul Prabhakaran
  • Kyungtae Kim
  • Ahmed Ebeido
  • Ramin Motamed

In addition to journal publications, Ahmed Elgamal has contributed to book publications through the Transportation Research Board eBooks. Two titles published in 2024 are:

  • Seismic Site Response Analysis with Pore Water Pressure Generation: Resources for Evaluation
  • Seismic Site Response Analysis with Pore Water Pressure Generation: Guidelines

Best Publications

  • Computational Model for Cyclic Mobility and Associated Shear Deformation

    Zhaohui Yang;Ahmed Elgamal;Ender Parra

  • Modeling of cyclic mobility in saturated cohesionless soils

    Ahmed Elgamal;Zhaohui Yang;Ender Parra;Ahmed Ragheb

  • Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response

    Ahmed Elgamal;Zhaohui Yang;Ender Parra

  • Lotung Downhole Array. II: Evaluation of Soil Nonlinear Properties

    M. Zeghal;A.-W. Elgamal;H. T. Tang;J. C. Stepp

  • Analysis of Site Liquefaction Using Earthquake Records

    Unknown

  • Stone columns as liquefaction countermeasure in non-plastic silty soils

    K Adalier;A Elgamal;J Meneses;J.I Baez

  • Mitigation of liquefaction and associated ground deformations by stone columns

    Korhan Adalier;Ahmed Elgamal

  • Three-Dimensional Seismic Response of Humboldt Bay Bridge-Foundation-Ground System

    Ahmed Elgamal;Linjun Yan;Zhaohui Yang;Joel P. Conte

  • Influence of Permeability on Liquefaction-Induced Shear Deformation

    Zhaohui Yang;Ahmed Elgamal

  • Mitigation of Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Deformation in a Sloping Stratum: Three-dimensional Numerical Simulation

    Ahmed Elgamal;Jinchi Lu;Davide Forcellini

  • Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Earthquake Response Analysis of a Bridge-Foundation-Ground System

    Yuyi Zhang;Joel P. Conte;Zhaohui Yang;Ahmed Elgamal

  • VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION RECORDS: AN OVERVIEW

    Ahmed Elgamal;Liangcai He

  • OpenSees Soil Models and Solid- Fluid Fully Coupled Elements User's Manual

    Zhaohui Yang;Jinchi Lu;Ahmed Elgamal

  • Sensor Network for Structural Health Monitoring of a Highway Bridge

    Michael Fraser;Ahmed Elgamal;Xianfei He;Joel P. Conte

  • Experimental and Numerical Seismic Response of a 65 kW Wind Turbine

    Ian Prowell;Marc Veletzos;Ahmed Elgamal;José Restrepo

  • Lotung Downhole Array. I: Evaluation of Site Dynamic Properties

    A.-W. Elgamal;M. Zeghal;H. T. Tang;J. C. Stepp

  • Foundation Liquefaction Countermeasures for Earth Embankments

    Unknown

  • Dynamic Response of Saturated Dense Sand in Laminated Centrifuge Container

    Ahmed Elgamal;Zhaohui Yang;Tao Lai;Bruce L. Kutter

  • Analysis of Site Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading Using Centrifuge Testing Records

    Ahmedw. Elgamal;Mourad Zeghal;Victor Taboada;Ricardo Dobry

  • International Benchmark on Numerical Simulations for 1D, Nonlinear Site Response (PRENOLIN): Verification Phase Based on Canonical Cases

    Julie Régnier;Luis Fabian Bonilla;Pierre Yves Bard;Etienne Bertrand

  • Dynamic Testing of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge

    Joel P. Conte;Xianfei He;Babak Moaveni;Sami F. Masri

  • System Identification of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge Using Dynamic Field Test Data

    Xianfei He;Babak Moaveni;Joel P. Conte;Ahmed Elgamal

Frequent Co-Authors

Joel P. Conte
Joel P. Conte University of California, San Diego
Ricardo Dobry
Ricardo Dobry Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Tarek Abdoun
Tarek Abdoun Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Sami F. Masri
Sami F. Masri University of Southern California
Kincho H. Law
Kincho H. Law Stanford University
Ross W. Boulanger
Ross W. Boulanger University of California, Davis
Chia-Ming Uang
Chia-Ming Uang University of California, San Diego
Kohji Tokimatsu
Kohji Tokimatsu Tokyo Institute of Technology
Bruce L. Kutter
Bruce L. Kutter University of California, Davis
Jason Jonkman
Jason Jonkman National Renewable Energy Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA presents a range of career opportunities, enhanced by flexible online degrees. For those seeking business leadership, a one year online mba entrepreneurship program offers accelerated learning, allowing aspiring innovators to quickly gain essential start-up and management skills.

Cost and admission requirements are common concerns for many students. Fortunately, there are options like the cheapest online mba no gmat, which eliminate standardized test barriers and make graduate education more accessible.

Engineering graduates interested in leadership roles can benefit from a cheapest online master's in project management to develop expertise in planning, executing, and overseeing complex projects—skills highly valued across technology fields.

Beyond engineering, interdisciplinary paths like real estate degree programs are becoming popular, especially for those interested in property development, investment, or combining tech with real estate analytics. These diverse online options help students effectively tailor their education toward their career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Ahmed Elgamal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles