World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
4871
World Ranking
8943
National Ranking
3208

Gunnar W. Schade publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunnar W. Schade sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 87 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Gunnar W. Schade D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunnar W. Schade sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gunnar W. Schade is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States and conducts research primarily in environmental science. Their work focuses on several interconnected areas, including global and planetary change, renewable energy, sustainability and the environment, atmospheric science, aerospace engineering, and environmental engineering.

The main topics covered in their research include atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, oil, gas, and environmental issues, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric ozone and climate, spacecraft and cryogenic technologies, wind and air flow studies, as well as graphite, nuclear technology, and radiation studies.

Schade's frequently published research appears in journals such as Atmosphere, Energies, Geophysical Research Letters, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, and the Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. The highest number of publications are found in Atmosphere, followed by Energies.

Recent publications by Schade include the following:

  • "Multisatellite Imaging of a Gas Well Blowout Enables Quantification of Total Methane Emissions," 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Air quality measurements in the western Eagle Ford Shale," 2020, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • "Standardized Reporting Needed to Improve Accuracy of Flaring Data," 2021, Energies
  • "Testing HYSPLIT Plume Dispersion Model Performance Using Regional Hydrocarbon Monitoring Data during a Gas Well Blowout," 2022, Atmosphere
  • "Comparing Permitted Emissions to Atmospheric Observations of Hydrocarbons in the Eagle Ford Shale Suggests Permit Violations," 2021, Energies

Some of the researchers frequently collaborating with Schade include Yangyang Xu, Joel Holliman, Daniel Cusworth, Riley Duren, and Andrew K. Thorpe.

Their research contributes to improving understanding in areas such as methane emissions quantification through remote sensing, air quality monitoring in shale regions, accuracy of flaring data reporting, and atmospheric hydrocarbon dispersion modeling.

Best Publications

  • Biomass burning as a source of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, methanol, acetone, acetonitrile and hydrogen cyanide

    Rupert Holzinger;Carsten Warneke;Armin Hansel;Alfons Jordan

  • Emission of aliphatic amines from animal husbandry and their reactions: Potential source of N2O and HCN

    Gunnar W. Schade;Paul J. Crutzen

  • Fluxes of oxygenated volatile organic compounds from a ponderosa pine plantation

    Gunnar W. Schade;Allen H. Goldstein

  • Insights into hydroxyl measurements and atmospheric oxidation in a California forest

    J. Mao;J. Mao;X. Ren;L. Zhang;D. M. Van Duin

  • Forest thinning experiment confirms ozone deposition to forest canopy is dominated by reaction with biogenic VOCs

    A. H. Goldstein;M. McKay;M. R. Kurpius;G. W. Schade;G. W. Schade

  • Characterization of secondary atmospheric photooxidation products: Evidence for biogenic and anthropogenic sources

    Reggie S. Spaulding;Gunnar W. Schade;Gunnar W. Schade;Allen H. Goldstein;M. Judith Charles

  • Organosulfates as Tracers for Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Formation from 2-Methyl-3-Buten-2-ol (MBO) in the Atmosphere

    Haofei Zhang;David R. Worton;Michael Lewandowski;John Ortega

  • Chemical evolution of the Sacramento urban plume: Transport and oxidation

    M. B. Dillon;M. S. Lamanna;G. W. Schade;A. H. Goldstein

  • CO emissions from degrading plant matter.

    Gunnar W. Schade;Rolf-M. Hofmann;Paul J. Crutzen

  • Observational insights into aerosol formation from isoprene

    David R. Worton;Jason D. Surratt;Brian W. Lafranchi;Brian W. Lafranchi;Arthur W.H. Chan

  • Are monoterpene emissions influenced by humidity

    Gunnar W. Schade;Allen H. Goldstein;Mark S. Lamanna

  • Importance of biogenic precursors to the budget of organic nitrates: observations of multifunctional organic nitrates by CIMS and TD-LIF during BEARPEX 2009

    M. R. Beaver;M. R. Beaver;J. M. St. Clair;F. Paulot;K. M. Spencer

  • OVOC emissions from agricultural soil in northern Germany during the 2003 European heat wave

    Gunnar W. Schade;Thomas G. Custer

  • Quantifying biogenic and anthropogenic contributions to acetone mixing ratios in a rural environment

    Allen H Goldstein;Gunnar W Schade

  • Canopy and leaf level 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol fluxes from a ponderosa pine plantation

    Gunnar W Schade;Allen H Goldstein;Dennis W Gray;Manuel T Lerdau

  • Multisatellite Imaging of a Gas Well Blowout Enables Quantification of Total Methane Emissions

    Daniel H. Cusworth;Riley M. Duren;Riley M. Duren;Andrew K. Thorpe;Sudhanshu Pandey

  • Observational constraints on the contribution of isoprene oxidation to ozone production on the western slope of the Sierra Nevada, California

    Gabrielle B. Dreyfus;Gunnar W. Schade;Allen H. Goldstein

  • Real-Time Monitoring of Emissions from Monoethanolamine-Based Industrial Scale Carbon Capture Facilities

    Liang Zhu;Gunnar Wolfgang Schade;Claus Jørgen Nielsen

  • Seasonal measurements of acetone and methanol: Abundances and implications for atmospheric budgets

    Gunnar W. Schade;Gunnar W. Schade;Allen H. Goldstein

  • Increase of monoterpene emissions from a pine plantation as a result of mechanical disturbances

    Gunnar W. Schade;Gunnar W. Schade;Allen H. Goldstein

  • A comparison of new measurements of total monoterpene flux with improved measurements of speciated monoterpene flux

    A. Lee;G. W. Schade;R. Holzinger;A. H. Goldstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Allen H. Goldstein
Allen H. Goldstein University of California, Berkeley
Qi Ying
Qi Ying Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Ronald C. Cohen
Ronald C. Cohen University of California, Berkeley
Armin Hansel
Armin Hansel University of Innsbruck
Jessica B. Gilman
Jessica B. Gilman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Paul J. Crutzen
Paul J. Crutzen Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Paul O. Wennberg
Paul O. Wennberg California Institute of Technology
John D. Crounse
John D. Crounse California Institute of Technology
Fabien Paulot
Fabien Paulot Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Glenn M. Wolfe
Glenn M. Wolfe University of Maryland, Baltimore County

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA, diversifying skills through related degrees can open new professional avenues. Combining environmental expertise with public policy knowledge, for example, is valuable. Prospective professionals often consider the best online MPA programs, which offer focused training in public administration and sustainability management in just one year.

Social factors play a crucial role in environmental outcomes. Therefore, pursuing a complementary degree such as the best online sociology bachelor degree can enhance understanding of human-environment interactions and improve community-focused solutions.

For those advancing into leadership or academic roles, doctoral education is often essential. However, many candidates seek flexible options, leading them to explore EdD without dissertation pathways that streamline the process while maintaining academic rigor.

It’s important to choose credible institutions when pursuing advanced degrees. Prospective students should look into accredited EdS to EdD programs to ensure quality education and better career prospects in environmental policy, education, and administration.

Best Scientists Citing Gunnar W. Schade

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles