World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
94
Citations
31070
World Ranking
658
National Ranking
361

David V. Schaffer publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David V. Schaffer sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 355 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

David V. Schaffer D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David V. Schaffer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

David V. Schaffer is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cell Biology, Biomedical Engineering, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

They have contributed extensively to topics including:

  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Their recent notable publications include:

  • The delivery challenge: fulfilling the promise of therapeutic genome editing (2020), Nature Biotechnology
  • In vivo hypermutation and continuous evolution (2022), Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • In vivo-directed evolution of adeno-associated virus in the primate retina (2020), JCI Insight
  • Engineered Illumination Devices for Optogenetic Control of Cellular Signaling Dynamics (2020), Cell Reports
  • Adeno-Associated Virus Vector for Central Nervous System Gene Therapy (2021), Trends in Molecular Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David V. Schaffer include Sanjay Kumar, Rocío Sampayo, Jieung Baek, Nicole Repina, and Hunter J. Johnson.

Their work has been published in various scientific venues, with recurrent contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Science Advances
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Biophysical Journal

Best Publications

  • Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior.

    Krishanu Saha;Albert J. Keung;Elizabeth F. Irwin;Yang Li

  • A Designer AAV Variant Permits Efficient Retrograde Access to Projection Neurons.

    D. Gowanlock R. Tervo;Bum Yeol Hwang;Sarada Viswanathan;Thomas Gaj

  • Engineering adeno-associated viruses for clinical gene therapy

    Melissa A. Kotterman;David V. Schaffer

  • In Vivo???Directed Evolution of a New Adeno-Associated Virus for Therapeutic Outer Retinal Gene Delivery from the Vitreous

    Deniz Dalkara;Leah C. Byrne;Ryan R. Klimczak;Meike Visel

  • The Influence of Hydrogel Modulus on the Proliferation and Differentiation of Encapsulated Neural Stem Cells

    Akhilesh Banerjee;Manish Arha;Soumitra Choudhary;Randolph S. Ashton

  • Stochastic Gene Expression in a Lentiviral Positive-Feedback Loop: HIV-1 Tat Fluctuations Drive Phenotypic Diversity

    Leor S. Weinberger;John C. Burnett;John C. Burnett;Jared E. Toettcher;Adam P. Arkin;Adam P. Arkin

  • Vector unpacking as a potential barrier for receptor‐mediated polyplex gene delivery

    David V. Schaffer;Nick A. Fidelman;Nily Dan;Douglas A. Lauffenburger

  • Directed evolution of adeno-associated virus yields enhanced gene delivery vectors.

    Narendra Maheshri;James T Koerber;Brian K Kaspar;David V Schaffer

  • The AAV Vector Toolkit: Poised at the Clinical Crossroads

    Aravind Asokan;David V Schaffer;David V Schaffer;R Jude Samulski

  • Optogenetic protein clustering and signaling activation in mammalian cells

    Lukasz J Bugaj;Atri T Choksi;Colin K Mesuda;Ravi S Kane

  • Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming

    Timothy L. Downing;Jennifer Soto;Constant Morez;Constant Morez;Timothee Houssin;Timothee Houssin

  • PI3K/Akt and CREB regulate adult neural hippocampal progenitor proliferation and differentiation

    Joseph Peltier;Analeah O'Neill;David V. Schaffer

  • Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy: Translational and Clinical Outlook

    Melissa A. Kotterman;Thomas W. Chalberg;David V. Schaffer

  • Single-cell western blotting

    Alex J Hughes;Dawn P Spelke;Zhuchen Xu;Chi-Chih Kang

  • Inner limiting membrane barriers to AAV-mediated retinal transduction from the vitreous.

    Deniz Dalkara;Kathleen D Kolstad;Natalia Caporale;Meike Visel

  • A fully defined and scalable 3D culture system for human pluripotent stem cell expansion and differentiation

    Yuguo Lei;David V. Schaffer

  • Transforming Growth Factor‐β and Notch Signaling Mediate Stem Cell Differentiation into Smooth Muscle Cells

    Kyle Kurpinski;Hayley Lam;Julia Chu;Aijun Wang

  • Quantitative Magnetic Particle Imaging Monitors the Transplantation, Biodistribution, and Clearance of Stem Cells In Vivo.

    Bo Zheng;Marc Philip von See;Elaine Yu;Beliz Gunel

  • Nox2 redox signaling maintains essential cell populations in the brain

    Bryan C Dickinson;Joseph Peltier;Daniel Stone;David V Schaffer

  • Supplemental Data: Stochastic Gene Expression in a Lentiviral Positive Feedback Loop: HIV-1 Tat Fluctuations Drive Phenotypic Diversity

    Leor S Weinberger;John C Burnett;Jared E Toettcher;Adam P Arkin

Frequent Co-Authors

John G. Flannery
John G. Flannery University of California, Berkeley
Kevin E. Healy
Kevin E. Healy University of California, Berkeley
Adam P. Arkin
Adam P. Arkin Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Deniz Dalkara
Deniz Dalkara Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Ravi S. Kane
Ravi S. Kane Georgia Institute of Technology
David Kirn
David Kirn University of California, Berkeley
William H. Merigan
William H. Merigan University of Rochester
Brian K. Kaspar
Brian K. Kaspar Insmed Incorporated
Douglas S. Clark
Douglas S. Clark University of California, Berkeley
Joshua T. Dudman
Joshua T. Dudman Howard Hughes Medical Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in extending their molecular biology background into healthcare or life sciences, a wide variety of direct entry msn programs now exist for non-nurses. These accelerated online master’s degree options are ideal for career changers with a science foundation who want to pursue advanced nursing roles.

Choosing the right school is crucial for online study. Many prospective students compare capella vs wgu rn to bsn programs to identify institutions that suit their needs, considering factors like flexibility, cost, and accreditation.

Bridge programs like bsn to msn online programs allow current nurses to specialize further or progress into leadership positions. These affordable options provide a flexible pathway for advancing your scope in healthcare without disrupting your career.

When exploring online degrees, consider enrolling at non profit universities that are accredited and recognized for quality. Non-profit institutions often offer greater student support and transparent costs, helping you make the most informed investment in your future.

Best Scientists Citing David V. Schaffer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles