World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
11966
World Ranking
15524
National Ranking
6477

Noelle S. Williams publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noelle S. Williams sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 191 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Noelle S. Williams D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noelle S. Williams sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Noelle S. Williams is affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily in Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. These fields are reflected through a significant number of publications and contributions to molecular biology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, cancer research, and oncology.

Williams's scientific work covers various specialized topics including:

  • Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Biochemical and Molecular Research
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Several recent publications illustrate the scope of Williams's research interests and contributions. These papers include:

  • Reducing acetylated tau is neuroprotective in brain injury, 2021, published in Cell
  • A trimethoprim derivative impedes antibiotic resistance evolution, 2021, published in Nature Communications
  • A male-derived nonribosomal peptide pheromone controls female schistosome development, 2022, published in Cell
  • An oxindole efflux inhibitor potentiates azoles and impairs virulence in the fungal pathogen Candida auris, 2020, published in Nature Communications
  • Inhibition of the de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway limits ribosomal RNA transcription causing nucleolar stress in glioblastoma cells, 2020, published in PLoS Genetics

Frequent co-authors in Williams's work indicate collaborative efforts with other researchers in the field. Key collaborators include Jessica A. Kilgore, Joseph M. Ready, Jef K. De Brabander, Jiwoong Kim, and Francisco Ortiz.

Williams's research output is published in a range of scientific venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • Cell
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation

Their work incorporates methodologies and insights from molecular biology, epidemiology, and clinical studies, contributing to an understanding of infectious diseases, cancer biology, and biochemical mechanisms. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in the diversity of publication outlets and collaborative networks.

Best Publications

  • Small molecule-mediated disruption of Wnt-dependent signaling in tissue regeneration and cancer

    Baozhi Chen;Michael E. Dodge;Wei Tang;Jianming Lu

  • Targeting QseC Signaling and Virulence for Antibiotic Development

    David A. Rasko;Cristiano G. Moreira;De Run Li;Nicola C. Reading

  • Anticancer sulfonamides target splicing by inducing RBM39 degradation via recruitment to DCAF15

    Ting Han;Maria Goralski;Nicholas Gaskill;Emanuela Capota

  • Discovery of a Proneurogenic, Neuroprotective Chemical

    Andrew A. Pieper;Shanhai Xie;Emanuela Capota;Sandi Jo Estill

  • Inhibition of the prostaglandin-degrading enzyme 15-PGDH potentiates tissue regeneration

    Yongyou Zhang;Amar Desai;Sung Yeun Yang;Sung Yeun Yang;Ki Beom Bae;Ki Beom Bae

  • Gboxin is an oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor that targets glioblastoma

    Yufeng Shi;S. Kyun Lim;Qiren Liang;Swathi V. Iyer

  • Identification and validation of genes involved in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer using cDNA microarrays and RNA interference.

    Noelle Sevilir Williams;Richard B. Gaynor;Shane Scoggin;Udit Verma

  • Targeted inhibitors of P-glycoprotein increase chemotherapeutic-induced mortality of multidrug resistant tumor cells

    Amila K. Nanayakkara;Courtney A. Follit;Gang Chen;Noelle S. Williams

  • Identification of NF-κB-regulated genes induced by TNFα utilizing expression profiling and RNA interference

    Anwu Zhou;Shane Scoggin;Richard B Gaynor;Richard B Gaynor;Noelle Sevilir Williams

  • Development of Proneurogenic, Neuroprotective Small Molecules

    Karen S. MacMillan;Jacinth Naidoo;Jue Liang;Lisa Melito

  • Regulation of VEGF-induced endothelial cell migration by mitochondrial reactive oxygen species.

    Youxue Wang;Qun S. Zang;Zijuan Liu;Qian Wu

  • A Validated Tumorgraft Model Reveals Activity of Dovitinib Against Renal Cell Carcinoma

    Sharanya Sivanand;Samuel Peña-Llopis;Hong Zhao;Blanka Kucejova

  • Systematic Identification of Molecular Subtype-Selective Vulnerabilities in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

    Hyun Seok Kim;Saurabh Mendiratta;Jiyeon Kim;Chad Victor Pecot

  • Generation of Lytic Natural Killer 1.1+, Ly-49− Cells from Multipotential Murine Bone Marrow Progenitors in a Stroma-free Culture: Definition of Cytokine Requirements and Developmental Intermediates

    Noelle Sevilir Williams;Thomas A. Moore;John D. Schatzle;Igor J. Puzanov

  • The P7C3 class of neuroprotective compounds exerts antidepressant efficacy in mice by increasing hippocampal neurogenesis

    Walker Ak;Rivera Pd;Wang Q;Chuang Jc

  • Neuroprotective efficacy of aminopropyl carbazoles in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Rachel Tesla;Hamilton Parker Wolf;Pin Xu;Jordan Drawbridge

  • Neuroprotective efficacy of aminopropyl carbazoles in a mouse model of Parkinson disease

    Héctor De Jesús-Cortés;Pin Xu;Jordan Drawbridge;Sandi Jo Estill

  • Identification of a population of CD4+ CTL that utilizes a perforin- rather than a Fas ligand-dependent cytotoxic mechanism.

    Noelle Sevilir Williams;Victor H. Engelhard

  • Differentiation of NK1.1+, Ly49+ NK Cells from flt3+ Multipotent Marrow Progenitor Cells

    Noelle Sevilir Williams;Jennifer Klem;Igor J. Puzanov;P. V. Sivakumar

  • Structure/Activity Relationship Studies of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Wnt Response

    Jianming Lu;Zhiqiang Ma;Jen Chieh Hsieh;Chih Wei Fan

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew A. Pieper
Andrew A. Pieper University of Iowa
Jef K. De Brabander
Jef K. De Brabander The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lawrence G. Lum
Lawrence G. Lum University of Virginia
David A. Boothman
David A. Boothman Indiana University
Michael G. Roth
Michael G. Roth The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Ralph J. DeBerardinis
Ralph J. DeBerardinis The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Michael J. Bennett
Michael J. Bennett University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
John D. Minna
John D. Minna The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Michael A. White
Michael A. White Ideaya Biosciences (United States)
Steven L. McKnight
Steven L. McKnight The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to various healthcare and science careers. Many students start by exploring ultrasound tech online programs, which combine biology foundations with hands-on healthcare roles.

For those interested in medical imaging, the cheapest radiology tech programs offer a cost-effective entry point to this fast-growing field. These programs can help graduates secure well-paying, in-demand jobs soon after completion.

Graduates with a focus on nutrition and public health may consider the best dietetics masters programs to further specialize and boost their career prospects.

Entry-level healthcare careers are also available through online training. Those seeking flexibility and support should explore financial aid for medical assistant programs.

These related online degrees and pathways allow students to advance their skills and find rewarding careers in the health sciences sector.

Best Scientists Citing Noelle S. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles