World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
11786
World Ranking
14390
National Ranking
6059

Sanford L. Boye publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanford L. Boye sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 276 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Sanford L. Boye D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanford L. Boye sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sanford L. Boye is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research contributions focus primarily on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a significant emphasis on molecular biology and genetics as subfields of study.

The scientist's work covers several specialized topics, including:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Ocular Disorders and Treatments

Boye has collaborated frequently with several colleagues, including Diego Fajardo, Artur V. Cideciyan, Samuel G. Jacobson, and Sean M. Crosson.

Their publications have appeared most frequently in the following venues:

  • Molecular Therapy
  • Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • iScience
  • Human Gene Therapy

Recent papers include the following:

  • Current Clinical Applications of In Vivo Gene Therapy with AAVs, 2020, Molecular Therapy
  • SARM1 depletion rescues NMNAT1-dependent photoreceptor cell death and retinal degeneration, 2020, eLife
  • Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) Capsid Stability and Liposome Remodeling During Endo/Lysosomal pH Trafficking, 2020, Viruses
  • Identifying Treatments for Taste and Smell Disorders: Gaps and Opportunities, 2020, Chemical Senses
  • Safety and improved efficacy signals following gene therapy in childhood blindness caused by GUCY2D mutations, 2021, iScience

Best Publications

  • Treatment of Leber Congenital Amaurosis Due to RPE65 Mutations by Ocular Subretinal Injection of Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Vector: Short-Term Results of a Phase I Trial

    William W. Hauswirth;Tomas S. Aleman;Shalesh Kaushal;Artur V. Cideciyan

  • Human gene therapy for RPE65 isomerase deficiency activates the retinoid cycle of vision but with slow rod kinetics

    Artur V. Cideciyan;Tomas S. Aleman;Sanford L. Boye;Sharon B. Schwartz

  • Gene therapy for leber congenital amaurosis caused by RPE65 mutations: safety and efficacy in 15 children and adults followed up to 3 years

    Samuel G. Jacobson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Ramakrishna Ratnakaram;Elise Heon

  • Current Clinical Applications of In Vivo Gene Therapy with AAVs.

    Jerry R. Mendell;Jerry R. Mendell;Samiah A. Al-Zaidy;Louise R. Rodino-Klapac;Kimberly Goodspeed

  • Human RPE65 Gene Therapy for Leber Congenital Amaurosis: Persistence of Early Visual Improvements and Safety at 1 Year

    Artur V. Cideciyan;William W. Hauswirth;Tomas S. Aleman;Shalesh Kaushal

  • Virally delivered Channelrhodopsin-2 Safely and Effectively Restores Visual Function in Multiple Mouse Models of Blindness

    M Mehdi Doroudchi;Kenneth P Greenberg;Jianwen Liu;Kimberly A Silka

  • A comprehensive review of retinal gene therapy.

    Shannon E Boye;Sanford L Boye;Alfred S Lewin;William W Hauswirth

  • Gene therapy rescues photoreceptor blindness in dogs and paves the way for treating human X-linked retinitis pigmentosa

    William A. Beltran;Artur V. Cideciyan;Alfred S. Lewin;Simone Iwabe

  • Vision 1 year after gene therapy for Leber's congenital amaurosis.

    Artur V. Cideciyan;William W. Hauswirth;Tomas S. Aleman;Shalesh Kaushal

  • Safety of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus Type 2–RPE65 Vector Delivered by Ocular Subretinal Injection

    Samuel G. Jacobson;Gregory M. Acland;Gustavo D. Aguirre;Tomas S. Aleman

  • Treatment of retinitis pigmentosa due to MERTK mutations by ocular subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus gene vector: results of a phase I trial

    Nicola G. Ghazi;Emad B. Abboud;Sawsan R. Nowilaty;Hisham Alkuraya

  • Long-term retinal function and structure rescue using capsid mutant AAV8 vector in the rd10 mouse, a model of recessive retinitis pigmentosa.

    Ji-jing Pang;Xufeng Dai;Xufeng Dai;Shannon E Boye;Ilaria Barone

  • Targeting Photoreceptors via Intravitreal Delivery Using Novel, Capsid-Mutated AAV Vectors

    Christine N. Kay;Renee C. Ryals;George V. Aslanidi;Seok Hong Min

  • Gene delivery to mitochondria by targeting modified adenoassociated virus suppresses Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy in a mouse model

    Hong Yu;Rajeshwari D. Koilkonda;Tsung Han Chou;Vittorio Porciatti

  • AAV-mediated gene therapy for retinal degeneration in the rd10 mouse containing a recessive PDEbeta mutation.

    Ji-jing Pang;Sanford L. Boye;Ashok Kumar;Astra Dinculescu

  • Retinal gene therapy with a large MYO7A cDNA using adeno-associated virus

    Vanda S. Lopes;Shannon E. Boye;Carrie M. Louie;Sanford Boye

  • AAV-mediated cone rescue in a naturally occurring mouse model of CNGA3-achromatopsia.

    Ji-jing Pang;Ji-jing Pang;Wen-Tao Deng;Xufeng Dai;Xufeng Dai;Bo Lei

  • The human rhodopsin kinase promoter in an AAV5 vector confers rod- and cone-specific expression in the primate retina.

    Shannon E. Boye;John J. Alexander;Sanford L. Boye;Clark D. Witherspoon

  • Dual Adeno-Associated Virus Vectors Result in Efficient In Vitro and In Vivo Expression of an Oversized Gene, MYO7A

    Frank M. Dyka;Sanford L. Boye;Vince A. Chiodo;William W. Hauswirth

  • Functional and behavioral restoration of vision by gene therapy in the guanylate cyclase-1 (GC1) knockout mouse.

    Shannon E. Boye;Sanford L. Boye;Jijing Pang;Renee Ryals

Frequent Co-Authors

William W. Hauswirth
William W. Hauswirth University of Florida
Vince A. Chiodo
Vince A. Chiodo University of Florida
Samuel G. Jacobson
Samuel G. Jacobson University of Pennsylvania
Artur V. Cideciyan
Artur V. Cideciyan University of Pennsylvania
Gustavo D. Aguirre
Gustavo D. Aguirre University of Pennsylvania
Alfred S. Lewin
Alfred S. Lewin University of Florida
Tomas S. Aleman
Tomas S. Aleman University of Pennsylvania
Bo Chang
Bo Chang University of California, Los Angeles
Paul D. Gamlin
Paul D. Gamlin University of Alabama at Birmingham
Barry J. Byrne
Barry J. Byrne University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens a wide range of online degree and career options across healthcare and science. Many students pursue an accelerated bachelor's degree in biology online for a flexible path toward laboratory work or advanced graduate studies.

If you’re interested in healthcare roles, bridging programs like the ma to lpn route allow those with medical assisting backgrounds to quickly gain more responsibilities as Licensed Practical Nurses. Alternatively, those seeking to become Registered Nurses may choose online asn programs to jumpstart their nursing careers through flexible study options.

There is also growing interest in nutrition and wellness. Pursuing an online dietitian degree enables students to prepare for certification and impactful roles in public health, food industry, or private practice. These diverse online degrees and pathways provide multiple avenues for careers in science, healthcare, and nutrition—empowering students to tailor their education to personal goals and industry demand.

Best Scientists Citing Sanford L. Boye

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles