World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
77
Citations
25939
World Ranking
1758
National Ranking
805

Thomas W. Glover publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Glover sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 185 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Thomas W. Glover D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Glover sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Thomas W. Glover is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Genetics and Molecular Biology as the predominant subfields.

Their scientific output includes papers published in several notable venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, Nucleic Acids Research, Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, and Clinical Radiology.

Key topics covered in their work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, Genomics and Rare Diseases, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, DNA Repair Mechanisms, Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics.

Frequent coauthors in their collaborations include Thomas E. Wilson, Samreen Ahmed, Amanda Winningham, and Jake Higgins.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Thomas W. Glover are as follows:

  • Twin peaks: finding fragile sites with MiDAS-seq, 2020, published in Cell Research
  • Locus-specific transcription silencing at the FHIT gene suppresses replication stress-induced copy number variant formation and associated replication delay, 2021, published in Nucleic Acids Research
  • Diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis, 2022, published in Clinical Radiology
  • Applications of advanced technologies for detecting genomic structural variation, 2023, published in Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
  • Replication stress induces POLQ-mediated structural variant formation throughout common fragile sites after entry into mitosis, 2024, published in Nature Communications

Thomas W. Glover was awarded the Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Recurrent de novo point mutations in lamin A cause Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome

    Maria Eriksson;W. Ted Brown;Leslie B. Gordon;Leslie B. Gordon;Michael W. Glynn

  • Aberrant regulation of ras proteins in malignant tumour cells from type 1 neurofibromatosis patients.

    Tanya N. Basu;David H. Gutmann;Jonathan A. Fletcher;Thomas W. Glover

  • Isolation of a partial candidate gene for Menkes disease by positional cloning.

    Julian F. B. Mercer;Janie Livingston;Bryan Hall;Jennifer A. Paynter

  • Chromosome fragile sites.

    Sandra G. Durkin;Thomas W. Glover

  • DNA polymerase α inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes

    Thomas W. Glover;Carol Berger;Jane Coyle;Barbara Echo

  • Mutations in FOXC2 (MFH-1), a forkhead family transcription factor, are responsible for the hereditary lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome.

    Jianming Fang;Susan L. Dagenais;Robert P. Erickson;Martin F. Arlt

  • ATR Regulates Fragile Site Stability

    Anne M. Casper;Paul Nghiem;Paul Nghiem;Martin F. Arlt;Thomas W. Glover

  • A de novo Alu insertion results in neurofibromatosis type 1.

    Margaret R. Wallace;Margaret R. Wallace;Lone B. Andersen;Ann M. Saulino;Paula E. Gregory

  • Somatic deletion of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene in a neurofibrosarcoma supports a tumour suppressor gene hypothesis.

    Eric Legius;Eric Legius;Douglas A. Marchuk;Francis S. Collins;Thomas W. Glover

  • Isolation and characterization of the faciogenital dysplasia (Aarskog-Scott syndrome) gene: A putative Rho Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor

    N. German Pasteris;Amy B. Cadle;Lindsay J. Logie;Mary E. M. Porteous

  • The Fanconi anemia pathway is required for the DNA replication stress response and for the regulation of common fragile site stability

    Niall G. Howlett;Toshiyasu Taniguchi;Sandra G. Durkin;Alan D. D'Andrea

  • FRA3B Extends Over a Broad Region and Contains a Spontaneous HPV16 Integration Site: Direct Evidence for the Coincidence of Viral Integration Sites and Fragile Sites

    Charles M. Wilke;Bryan K. Hall;Ann Hoge;William Paradee

  • Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes.

    Wendell Roelofs;Thomas Glover;Xian-Han Tang;Isabelle Sreng

  • Incomplete processing of mutant lamin A in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria leads to nuclear abnormalities, which are reversed by farnesyltransferase inhibition

    Michael W. Glynn;Thomas W. Glover

  • Replication of a Common Fragile Site, FRA3B, Occurs Late in S Phase and is Delayed Further Upon Induction: Implications for the Mechanism of Fragile Site Induction

    Michelle M. Le Beau;Feyruz V. Rassool;Mary E. Neilly;Rafael Espinosa

  • FUdR induction of the X chromosome fragile site: evidence for the mechanism of folic acid and thymidine inhibition.

    Glover Tw

  • X-linked mental retardation: A study of 7 families

    P A Jacobs;T W Glover;M Mayer;P Fox

  • Fragile sites in cancer: more than meets the eye.

    Thomas W. Glover;Thomas E. Wilson;Martin F. Arlt

  • Chromosome breakage and recombination at fragile sites.

    T W Glover;C K Stein

  • Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements

    Martin F. Arlt;Sandra G. Durkin;Ryan L. Ragland;Thomas W. Glover

Frequent Co-Authors

Francis S. Collins
Francis S. Collins National Institutes of Health
David G. Beer
David G. Beer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert P. Erickson
Robert P. Erickson University of Arizona
Mark B. Orringer
Mark B. Orringer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Samir M. Hanash
Samir M. Hanash The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Rork Kuick
Rork Kuick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Harry A. Drabkin
Harry A. Drabkin Medical University of South Carolina
Frederick Hecht
Frederick Hecht University of California, San Francisco
david i smith
david i smith Mayo Clinic
Stephen T. Warren
Stephen T. Warren Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics often leads to interest in related healthcare fields that also offer strong online degree options and clear career pathways. Many students look for programs that can fast-track or streamline their journey into healthcare professions.

For registered nurses seeking to advance, there are now rn to bsn no clinical hours programs that allow completion completely online, ideal for working professionals. Similarly, those with a master’s in nursing who wish to further specialize should consider the shortest post master's dnp program options, which minimize time to graduation.

If you are looking to enter the healthcare field quickly, there are pathways to medical assistant program completion in as little as six weeks through accelerated courses. Those on a budget can benefit from the cheapest msn to dnp programs, reducing the financial hurdle to advanced practice roles.

Each pathway offers unique benefits and challenges, so students should carefully research which aligns best with their career goals in genetics or related healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas W. Glover

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles