World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
75
Citations
19118
World Ranking
5347
National Ranking
2534

Loren G. Fong publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Loren G. Fong sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 215 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Loren G. Fong D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Loren G. Fong sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Loren G. Fong is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Molecular Biology as well as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses several subfields including Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cell Biology, and Cancer Research. Their research topics notably encompass lipid metabolism and disorders, diabetes, cardiovascular risks and lipoproteins, nuclear structure and function, RNA research and splicing, and caveolin-1 and cellular processes, among others.

Frequent publication venues for Loren G. Fong include:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Journal of Lipid Research
  • JCI Insight
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Nucleic Acids Research

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Loren G. Fong are:

  • High-resolution visualization and quantification of nucleic acid-based therapeutics in cells and tissues using Nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS), 2020, Nucleic Acids Research
  • Cultured macrophages transfer surplus cholesterol into adjacent cells in the absence of serum or high-density lipoproteins, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Chylomicronemia from GPIHBP1 autoantibodies, 2020, Journal of Lipid Research
  • Nuclear membrane ruptures underlie the vascular pathology in a mouse model of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome, 2021, JCI Insight
  • Peroxidasin-mediated bromine enrichment of basement membranes, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Loren G. Fong has collaborated frequently with other researchers in their field. Their most common co-authors include Stephen G. Young, Yiping Tu, Wenxin Song, Paul H. Kim, and Michael Ploug.

The focus of their work brings together facets of cardiovascular medicine and molecular biology to address complex biological and pathological processes. Their publications illustrate investigation into molecular mechanisms underlying lipid metabolism, cardiovascular risks related to diabetes, nuclear structure abnormalities, and RNA splicing processes.

Best Publications

  • Oxidatively modified low density lipoproteins: a potential role in recruitment and retention of monocyte/macrophages during atherogenesis

    Mark T. Quinn;Sampath Parthasarathy;Loren G. Fong;Daniel Steinberg

  • High-density lipoprotein inhibits the oxidative modification of low-density lipoprotein.

    Sampath Parthasarathy;Joellen Barnett;Loren G. Fong

  • Lamins A and C but not lamin B1 regulate nuclear mechanics

    Jan Lammerding;Loren G. Fong;Julie Y. Ji;Karen Reue;Karen Reue

  • Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-Anchored High-Density Lipoprotein-Binding Protein 1 Plays a Critical Role in the Lipolytic Processing of Chylomicrons

    Anne P. Beigneux;Brandon S.J. Davies;Peter Gin;Michael M. Weinstein

  • A Protein Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor Ameliorates Disease in a Mouse Model of Progeria

    Loren G. Fong;David Frost;Margarita Meta;Xin Qiao

  • GPIHBP1 Is Responsible for the Entry of Lipoprotein Lipase into Capillaries

    Brandon S.J. Davies;Anne P. Beigneux;Richard H. Barnes;Yiping Tu

  • Blocking protein farnesyltransferase improves nuclear blebbing in mouse fibroblasts with a targeted Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome mutation

    Shao H. Yang;Martin O. Bergo;Julia I. Toth;Xin Qiao

  • Nonenzymatic oxidative cleavage of peptide bonds in apoprotein B-100.

    L G Fong;S Parthasarathy;J L Witztum;D Steinberg

  • Blocking protein farnesyltransferase improves nuclear shape in fibroblasts from humans with progeroid syndromes

    Julia I. Toth;Shao H. Yang;Xin Qiao;Anne P. Beigneux

  • A farnesyltransferase inhibitor improves disease phenotypes in mice with a Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome mutation

    Shao H. Yang;Margarita Meta;Xin Qiao;David Frost

  • Laminopathies and the long strange trip from basic cell biology to therapy

    Howard J. Worman;Loren G. Fong;Antoine Muchir;Stephen G. Young

  • Thematic Review Series: Lipid Posttranslational Modifications. Prelamin A, Zmpste24, misshapen cell nuclei, and progeria—new evidence suggesting that protein farnesylation could be important for disease pathogenesis

    Stephen G. Young;Loren G. Fong;Susan Michaelis

  • Prelamin A and lamin A appear to be dispensable in the nuclear lamina

    Loren G. Fong;Jennifer K. Ng;Jan Lammerding;Timothy A. Vickers

  • Deficiencies in lamin B1 and lamin B2 cause neurodevelopmental defects and distinct nuclear shape abnormalities in neurons.

    Catherine Coffinier;Hea-Jin Jung;Chika Nobumori;Sandy Chang

  • Heterozygosity for Lmna deficiency eliminates the progeria-like phenotypes in Zmpste24-deficient mice

    Loren G. Fong;Jennifer K. Ng;Margarita Meta;Nathan Coté

  • Regulation of prelamin A but not lamin C by miR-9, a brain-specific microRNA

    Hea-Jin Jung;Catherine Coffinier;Youngshik Choe;Anne P. Beigneux

  • Recognition of solubilized apoproteins from delipidated, oxidized low density lipoprotein (LDL) by the acetyl-LDL receptor

    Sampath Parthasarathy;Loren G. Fong;Deborah Otero;Daniel Steinberg

  • Abnormal development of the cerebral cortex and cerebellum in the setting of lamin B2 deficiency

    Catherine Coffinier;Sandy Y. Chang;Chika Nobumori;Yiping Tu

  • Progerin elicits disease phenotypes of progeria in mice whether or not it is farnesylated

    Shao H. Yang;Douglas A. Andres;H. Peter Spielmann;Stephen G. Young

  • PCSK9 function and physiology

    Andrew S. Peterson;Loren G. Fong;Stephen G. Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen G. Young
Stephen G. Young University of California, Los Angeles
Anne P. Beigneux
Anne P. Beigneux University of California, Los Angeles
André Bensadoun
André Bensadoun Cornell University
Michael Ploug
Michael Ploug University of Copenhagen
Peter Tontonoz
Peter Tontonoz University of California, Los Angeles
Karen Reue
Karen Reue University of California, Los Angeles
Pieter J. de Jong
Pieter J. de Jong UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital
Laurent Vergnes
Laurent Vergnes University of California, Los Angeles
Richard T. Lee
Richard T. Lee Harvard University
Jan Lammerding
Jan Lammerding Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Loren G. Fong

Trending Scientists