World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
26017
World Ranking
9819
National Ranking
5049

David C. Warltier publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Warltier sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 469 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David C. Warltier D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Warltier sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David C. Warltier is affiliated with the Medical College of Wisconsin in the United States. Their professional profile reflects a focus in the medical academic field, although specific details about research work, topics, or publication records are not provided.

There are no recent papers listed for this scientist, and available data does not include details about frequent co-authors or common publication venues. Similarly, information regarding fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work is not available.

Details on book publications and awards have not been recorded. The absence of these data points means that no further elaboration on scholarly contributions or recognition is possible from the provided information.

David C. Warltier remains active in their professional capacity and has not been reported as deceased. This profile strictly adheres to the verified data without additional conjecture.

Best Publications

  • The systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery: implications for the anesthesiologist.

    John G Laffey;John F Boylan;Davy C H Cheng

  • Isoflurane mimics ischemic preconditioning via activation of K(ATP) channels: reduction of myocardial infarct size with an acute memory phase.

    Judy R. Kersten;Todd J. Schmeling;Paul S. Pagel;Garrett J. Gross

  • Isoflurane Protects against Myocardial Infarction during Early Reperfusion by Activation of Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase Signal Transduction: Evidence for Anesthetic-induced Postconditioning in Rabbits

    Pascal C. Chiari;Martin W. Bienengraeber;Paul S. Pagel;John G. Krolikowski

  • Mechanisms of cardioprotection by volatile anesthetics.

    Katsuya Tanaka;Lynda M. Ludwig;Judy R. Kersten;Paul S. Pagel

  • Levosimendan, a new positive inotropic drug, decreases myocardial infarct size via activation of K(ATP) channels.

    Judy R. Kersten;Matthew W. Montgomery;Paul S. Pagel;David C. Warltier

  • Ketamine Attenuates Delirium After Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

    Judith A. Hudetz;Kathleen M. Patterson;Zafar Iqbal;Sweeta D. Gandhi

  • Recovery of contractile function of stunned myocardium in chronically instrumented dogs is enhanced by halothane or isoflurane.

    David C. Warltier;Mahmood H. Al-Wathiqui;John P. Kampine;William T. Schmeling

  • Diabetes abolishes ischemic preconditioning: role of glucose, insulin, and osmolality

    Judy R. Kersten;Wolfgang G. Toller;Eric R. Gross;Paul S. Pagel

  • Acute hyperglycemia abolishes ischemic preconditioning in vivo

    Judy R. Kersten;Todd J. Schmeling;Karl G. Orth;Paul S. Pagel

  • Ischemia-Induced Coronary Collateral Growth Is Dependent on Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Nitric Oxide

    Toshiro Matsunaga;David C. Warltier;Dorothee W. Weihrauch;Melinda Moniz

  • A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of fast-track cardiac anesthesia.

    Paul S Myles;David J Daly;George Djaiani;Anna Lee

  • Beneficial actions of superoxide dismutase and catalase in stunned myocardium of dogs.

    G. J. Gross;N. E. Farber;H. F. Hardman;D. C. Warltier

  • Sevoflurane reduces myocardial infarct size and decreases the time threshold for ischemic preconditioning in dogs

    Wolfgang G. Toller;Judy R. Kersten;Paul S. Pagel;Douglas A. Hettrick

  • Mechanical function of the left atrium: new insights based on analysis of pressure-volume relations and Doppler echocardiography.

    Paul S. Pagel;Franz Kehl;Meir Gare;Douglas A. Hettrick

  • Ketamine attenuates post-operative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery.

    J. A. Hudetz;Z. Iqbal;S. D. Gandhi;K. M. Patterson

  • Characterization of a Novel PKA Phosphorylation Site, Serine-2030, Reveals No PKA Hyperphosphorylation of the Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor in Canine Heart Failure

    Bailong Xiao;Ming Tao Jiang;Mingcai Zhao;Dongmei Yang

  • Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of alterations in coronary wall shear stress produced by stent implantation.

    John F. LaDisa;Ismail Guler;Lars E. Olson;Douglas Anthony Hettrick;Douglas Anthony Hettrick

  • Approaches to the prevention of perioperative myocardial ischemia.

    David C. Warltier;Paul S. Pagel;Judy R. Kersten

  • Comparison of the systemic and coronary hemodynamic actions of desflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane in the chronically instrumented dog.

    Paul S. Paget;John P. Kampine;William T. Schmeling;David C. Warltier

  • Modifying cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus.

    Weidong Gu;Paul S Pagel;David C Warltier;Judy R Kersten

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul S. Pagel
Paul S. Pagel Medical College of Wisconsin
Judy R. Kersten
Judy R. Kersten Medical College of Wisconsin
Garrett J. Gross
Garrett J. Gross Medical College of Wisconsin
Yang Shi
Yang Shi University of Oxford
William M. Chilian
William M. Chilian Northeast Ohio Medical University
William D. O'Brien
William D. O'Brien University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Peter J. Newman
Peter J. Newman Medical College of Wisconsin
Anthony G. Hudetz
Anthony G. Hudetz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Raymond G. Hoffmann
Raymond G. Hoffmann Medical College of Wisconsin
Hemendra N. Bhargava
Hemendra N. Bhargava University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Medicine in the USA, it’s helpful to know about alternative and complementary online degrees within healthcare. For those interested in leadership and management roles, there are healthcare administration degrees available online, offering accelerated pathways into hospital or clinic administration.

Nursing professionals looking to advance their practice can take advantage of adn to fnp bridge programs. These programs help registered nurses earn a Master of Science in Nursing and become Family Nurse Practitioners without needing a separate bachelor’s degree.

Nutrition is another growing field closely tied to healthcare. Students can now pursue an online dietitian degree, which can open doors to roles in hospitals, wellness centers, and public health organizations.

For working professionals, earning a master’s degree may seem challenging. Fortunately, you can find whats the best online mha program for working adults to conveniently fit advanced coursework into your busy schedule.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Warltier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles