World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
99
Citations
41272
World Ranking
1572
National Ranking
882

James D. Marks publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Marks sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 309 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

James D. Marks D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Marks sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

James D. Marks is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their work spans multiple disciplines including Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with particular focus on Neurology and Molecular Biology among subfields such as Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Immunology.

The scientist's research primarily addresses topics related to neurological disorders and treatments, with a specific emphasis on Botulinum Toxin and related neurological disorders. Additional areas of interest include hereditary neurological disorders, Cell Adhesion Molecules Research, TGF-β signaling in diseases, biochemical and structural characterization, and signaling pathways involved in disease mechanisms.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by James D. Marks include:

  • Cryo-EM Reveals Integrin-Mediated TGF-β Activation without Release from Latent TGF-β, 2020, Cell
  • Dynamic allostery drives autocrine and paracrine TGF-β signaling, 2024, Cell
  • A tumor-specific mechanism of T reg enrichment mediated by the integrin αvβ8, 2021, Science Immunology
  • Targeting EphA2 in Bladder Cancer Using a Novel Antibody-Directed Nanotherapeutic, 2020, Pharmaceutics
  • A Monoclonal Antibody Combination against both Serotypes A and B Botulinum Toxin Prevents Inhalational Botulism in a Guinea Pig Model, 2021, Toxins

James D. Marks frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Toxins
  • Cell
  • Science Immunology
  • Pharmaceutics
  • Public Health Reports

The scientist collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Jianlong Lou
  • Shauna Farr-Jones
  • Weihua Wen
  • Fraser Conrad
  • Anthony Cormier

Best Publications

  • Methods for producing members of specific binding pairs

    John Mccafferty;Anthony Richard Pope;Kevin Stuart Johnson;Hendricus Renerus Jacobus Mattheus Hoogenboom

  • By-passing immunization: Human antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage

    James D. Marks;Hennie R. Hoogenboom;Timothy P. Bonnert;John McCafferty

  • Production of anti-self antibodies from antibody segment repertoires and displayed on phage

    Andrew David Lilac Court Griffiths;Hendricus Renerus Jacobus Mattheus Hoogenboom;James David Marks;John Mccafferty

  • Antibody targeting of long-circulating lipidic nanoparticles does not increase tumor localization but does increase internalization in animal models.

    Dmitri B. Kirpotin;Daryl C. Drummond;Yi Shao;M. Refaat Shalaby

  • Human anti‐self antibodies with high specificity from phage display libraries.

    A D Griffiths;M Malmqvist;J D Marks;J M Bye

  • Multivalent and multispecific binding proteins, their manufacture and use

    Kaspar-Philipp Holliger;Andrew David Griffiths;Hendricus Renerus Jacobus Matheus Hoogenboom;Magnus Malmqvist

  • By-passing immunization: building high affinity human antibodies by chain shuffling.

    James D. Marks;Andrew D. Griffiths;Magnus Malmqvist;Tim P. Clackson

  • Anti-HER2 immunoliposomes: enhanced efficacy attributable to targeted delivery.

    John W Park;Keelung Hong;Dmitri B Kirpotin;Gail Colbern

  • The repertoire of human germline VH sequences reveals about fifty groups of VH segments with different hypervariable loops.

    Ian M. Tomlinson;Gerald Walter;James D. Marks;Meirion B. Llewelyn

  • High affinity restricts the localization and tumor penetration of single-chain fv antibody molecules.

    Gregory P. Adams;Robert Schier;Adrian M. McCall;Heidi H. Simmons

  • Efficient construction of a large nonimmune phage antibody library: The production of high-affinity human single-chain antibodies to protein antigens

    Michael D. Sheets;Peter Amersdorfer;Ricarda Finnern;Peter Sargent

  • Structural repertoire of the human VH segments.

    Cyrus Chothia;Arthur M. Lesk;Ermanno Gherardi;Ian M. Tomlinson

  • Ineffectiveness of high-dose methylprednisolone in preventing parenchymal lung injury and improving mortality in patients with septic shock.

    J M Luce;A B Montgomery;J D Marks;J Turner

  • Isolation of Picomolar Affinity Anti-c-erbB-2 Single-chain Fv by Molecular Evolution of the Complementarity Determining Regions in the Center of the Antibody Binding Site

    Robert Schier;Adrian McCall;Gregory P. Adams;Keith W. Marshall

  • Isolation of high-affinity monomeric human anti-c-erbB-2 single chain Fv using affinity-driven selection.

    Robert Schier;Jacqueline Bye;Gerald Apell;Adrian McCall

  • Potent neutralization of botulinum neurotoxin by recombinant oligoclonal antibody.

    A. Nowakowski;C. Wang;D. B. Powers;P. Amersdorfer

  • Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-targeted Immunoliposomes Mediate Specific and Efficient Drug Delivery to EGFR- and EGFRvIII-overexpressing Tumor Cells

    Christoph Mamot;Daryl C Drummond;Udo Greiser;Keelung Hong

  • Tumor targeting using anti-her2 immunoliposomes

    J.W. Park;D.B. Kirpotin;K. Hong;R. Shalaby

  • Plasma tumor necrosis factor in patients with septic shock. Mortality rate, incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome, and effects of methylprednisolone administration

    James D. Marks;Cara Berman Marks;John M. Ljuce;A. Bruce Montgomery

  • Molecular evolution of proteins on filamentous phage. Mimicking the strategy of the immune system.

    J D Marks;H R Hoogenboom;A D Griffiths;G Winter

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew D. Griffiths
Andrew D. Griffiths PSL University
Leonard A. Smith
Leonard A. Smith United States Department of the Army
Gregory P. Adams
Gregory P. Adams Elucida Oncology
Louis M. Weiner
Louis M. Weiner Georgetown University Medical Center
John W. Park
John W. Park University of California, San Francisco
Christopher C. Benz
Christopher C. Benz Buck Institute for Research on Aging
Greg Winter
Greg Winter University of Cambridge
Keelung Hong
Keelung Hong California Pacific Medical Center
Andrew Bradbury
Andrew Bradbury Los Alamos National Laboratory
Willem H. Ouwehand
Willem H. Ouwehand University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James D. Marks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles