World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
8285
World Ranking
9612
National Ranking
600

Marianna Obrist publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianna Obrist sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 201 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marianna Obrist D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianna Obrist sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Marianna Obrist is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience with a focus on subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Human-Computer Interaction.

The main topics covered in Obrist's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Multisensory perception and integration, Color perception and design, Tactile and Sensory Interactions, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Culinary Culture and Tourism, and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts.

Obrist has published several papers in venues like Frontiers in Computer Science, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, and arXiv. Some notable recent papers are:

  • "Multisensory Integration as per Technological Advances: A Review," 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "SMELL SPACE," 2020, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Mid-Air Haptic Rendering of 2D Geometric Shapes With a Dynamic Tactile Pointer," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Haptics
  • "The sense of agency in emerging technologies for human-computer integration: A review," 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "Multisensory Experiences: A Primer," 2021, Frontiers in Computer Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Obrist include Patricia Cornelio, Carlos Velasco, Emanuela Maggioni, Christopher Dawes, and Chi Thanh. These collaborations have contributed to the development of research in various interdisciplinary contexts.

The publication record shows a presence in prominent journals and conferences, with multiple publications in Frontiers in Computer Science and the International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Obrist holds the distinction of being an ACM Senior Member since 2016.

Best Publications

  • Talking about tactile experiences

    Marianna Obrist;Sue Ann Seah;Sriram Subramanian

  • User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs

    Arnold P. O. S. Vermeeren;Effie Lai-Chong Law;Virpi Roto;Marianna Obrist

  • Live-streaming changes the (video) game

    Thomas Smith;Marianna Obrist;Peter Wright

  • Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration

    Florian Floyd Mueller;Pedro Lopes;Paul Strohmeier;Wendy Ju

  • Not just seeing, but also feeling art: Mid-air haptic experiences integrated in a multisensory art exhibition

    Chi Thanh Vi;Damien Ablart;Elia Gatti;Carlos Velasco;Carlos Velasco

  • Emotions Mediated Through Mid-Air Haptics

    Marianna Obrist;Sriram Subramanian;Elia Gatti;Benjamin Long

  • Opportunities for odor: experiences with smell and implications for technology

    Marianna Obrist;Alexandre N. Tuch;Kasper Hornbaek

  • Digitizing the chemical senses

    Charles Spence;Marianna Obrist;Carlos Velasco;Nimesha Ranasinghe

  • Interactive TV for the Home: An Ethnographic Study on Users' Requirements and Experiences

    Marianna Obrist;Regina Bernhaupt;Manfred Tscheligi

  • Crowdsourcing: leveraging innovation through online idea competitions

    Fiona Maria Schweitzer;Walter Buchinger;Oliver Gassmann;Marianna Obrist

  • Temporal, affective, and embodied characteristics of taste experiences: a framework for design

    Marianna Obrist;Rob Comber;Sriram Subramanian;Betina Piqueras-Fiszman

  • Emotional ratings and skin conductance response to visual, auditory and haptic stimuli.

    Elia Gatti;Elena Calzolari;Emanuela Maggioni;Marianna Obrist

  • User Experience Evaluation Methods in Academic and Industrial Contexts

    Virpi Roto;Marianna Obrist;Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila

  • Trends in the living room and beyond: results from ethnographic studies using creative and playful probing

    Regina Bernhaupt;Marianna Obrist;Astrid Weiss;Elke Beck

  • Multisensory Technology for Flavor Augmentation: A Mini Review

    Carlos Velasco;Marianna Obrist;Olivia Petit;Charles Spence

  • Multisensory Experiences in HCI

    Marianna Obrist;Elia Gatti;Emanuela Maggioni;Chi Thanh Vi

  • User experience evaluation: do you know which method to use?

    Marianna Obrist;Virpi Roto;Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila

  • Using Spatiotemporal Modulation to Draw Tactile Patterns in Mid-Air

    William Frier;Damien Ablart;Jamie Chilles;Benjamin Long

  • Multisensory Integration as per Technological Advances: A Review.

    Patricia Cornelio;Carlos Velasco;Marianna Obrist

  • SMELL SPACE: Mapping out the Olfactory Design Space for Novel Interactions

    Emanuela Maggioni;Robert Cobden;Dmitrijs Dmitrenko;Kasper Hornbæk

  • TastyFloats: A Contactless Food Delivery System

    Chi Thanh Vi;Asier Marzo;Damien Ablart;Gianluca Memoli

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Tscheligi
Manfred Tscheligi University of Salzburg
Carlos Velasco
Carlos Velasco BI Norwegian Business School
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Sriram Subramanian
Sriram Subramanian University College London
Anton Nijholt
Anton Nijholt University of Twente
Peter Wright
Peter Wright Newcastle University
Martin R. Yeomans
Martin R. Yeomans University of Sussex
Kasper Hornbæk
Kasper Hornbæk University of Copenhagen
Jamie Ward
Jamie Ward University of Sussex
Alberto Gallace
Alberto Gallace University of Milano-Bicocca

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related degrees and flexible career paths. Students seeking to broaden their skills can consider specialized programs such as an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering. This degree is ideal for those interested in hardware, electronics, and complex systems integration.

For learners focused on data science, affordability can be an important factor. Knowing what is the cheapest data science course in the US? helps students make informed decisions based on their budget without sacrificing educational quality.

Quicker credentials are also in demand. Some of the certifications for jobs offer fast, practical pathways into tech roles, enabling graduates to quickly enter high-paying positions or upskill for advancement.

If you’re aiming for an advanced credential, choosing the shortest masters degree program can help accelerate your professional journey, saving you time and supporting career growth in the rapidly-evolving tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Marianna Obrist

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles