World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
6637
World Ranking
11123
National Ranking
702

Matt Jones publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt Jones sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 238 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matt Jones D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt Jones sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matt Jones is affiliated with Swansea University in the United Kingdom and works primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their research encompasses several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, and Social Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work span across the following areas:

  • ICT in Developing Communities
  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Sports injuries and prevention

Notable recent publications by Matt Jones include:

  • "GAVeCeLT-WoCoVA Consensus on subcutaneously anchored securement devices for the securement of venous catheters: Current evidence and recommendations for future research" (2020) published in The Journal of Vascular Access
  • "Opportunities and Challenges of Automatic Speech Recognition Systems for Low-Resource Language Speakers" (2022) published in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "HFTS-2 Completions Design and State-of-the-Art Diagnostics Results" (2021) published in Proceedings of the 9th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference
  • "Keep it Short: A Comparison of Voice Assistants' Response Behavior" (2022) published in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Context-dependent amygdala-prefrontal connectivity during the dot-probe task varies by irritability and attention bias to angry faces" (2022) published in Neuropsychopharmacology

Matt Jones has collaborated frequently with several co-authors throughout their career. Frequent collaborators include Jennifer Pearson, Simon Robinson, Thomas Reitmaier, Dani Kalarikalayil Raju, and Joel Stoddard.

Their publications have appeared often in prominent venues such as:

  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • interactions

Best Publications

  • Mobile Interaction Design

    Matt Jones;Gary Marsden

  • Improving Web interaction on small displays

    Matt Jones;Gary Marsden;Norliza Mohd-Nasir;Kevin Boone

  • Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing

    Matt Jones

  • Improving mobile internet usability

    George Buchanan;Sarah Farrant;Matt Jones;Harold Thimbleby

  • Gamification and Adherence to Web-Based Mental Health Interventions: A Systematic Review

    Menna Brown;Noelle O'Neill;Hugo van Woerden;Parisa Eslambolchilar

  • Research in the wild: understanding 'in the wild' approaches to design and development

    Alan Chamberlain;Andy Crabtree;Tom Rodden;Matt Jones

  • Autoethnography: a tool for practice and education

    Sally Jo Cunningham;Matt Jones

  • Introduction to the Special Issue of “The Turn to The Wild”

    Andy Crabtree;Alan Chamberlain;Rebecca E. Grinter;Matt Jones

  • StoryBank: mobile digital storytelling in a development context

    David M. Frohlich;Dorothy Rachovides;Kiriaki Riga;Ramnath Bhat

  • Organizing digital music for use: an examination of personal music collections

    Sally Jo Cunningham;Matt Jones;Steve Jones

  • Usability analysis with Markov models

    Harold Thimbleby;Paul Cairns;Matt Jones

  • Improving web search on small screen devices

    Matt Jones;George Buchanan;Harold W. Thimbleby

  • Sorting Out Searching on Small Screen Devices

    Matt Jones;George Buchanan;Harold W. Thimbleby

  • ONTRACK: Dynamically adapting music playback to support navigation

    Matt Jones;Steve Jones;Gareth Bradley;Nigel Warren

  • Realistic books: a bizarre homage to an obsolete medium?

    Yi-Chun Chu;David Bainbridge;Matt Jones;Ian H. Witten

  • An evaluation of integrated zooming and scrolling on small screens

    Steve Jones;Matt Jones;Gary Marsden;Dynal Patel

  • "I did it my way": moving away from the tyranny of turn-by-turn pedestrian navigation

    Simon Robinson;Matt Jones;Parisa Eslambolchilar;Roderick Murray-Smith

  • CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Matt Jones;Philippe Palanque;Albrecht Schmidt;Tovi Grossman

  • Mobile collocated interactions: taking an offline break together

    Andrés Lucero;Matt Jones;Tero Jokela;Simon Robinson

  • Using keyphrases as search result surrogates on small screen devices

    Steve Jones;Matt Jones;Shaleen Deo_andA

  • An Evaluation of WebTwig - A Site Outliner for Handheld Web Access

    Matt Jones;George Buchanan;Norliza Mohd-Nasir

Frequent Co-Authors

Harold Thimbleby
Harold Thimbleby Swansea University
Sriram Subramanian
Sriram Subramanian University College London
Ian H. Witten
Ian H. Witten University of Waikato
Ann Blandford
Ann Blandford University College London
Roderick Murray-Smith
Roderick Murray-Smith University of Glasgow
Yvonne Rogers
Yvonne Rogers University College London
Laurence Nigay
Laurence Nigay Grenoble Alpes University
Yin-Leng Theng
Yin-Leng Theng Nanyang Technological University
Richard Harper
Richard Harper Social Shaping Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways in tech and engineering fields. For those interested in deep scientific theory, pursuing an online theoretical physics degree can be an excellent way to build a solid foundation in advanced concepts relevant to research and technology development.

If you're more interested in applying computing skills to real-world data, an affordable data science degree is a popular choice. This path often leads to rapidly growing roles in data analysis, artificial intelligence, and business informatics.

For those drawn to engineering, an online master’s in electrical engineering degree can help you specialize in high-demand sectors such as robotics, communications, or renewable energy.

If you prefer a faster route into the workforce, many 3-month certificate programs that pay well offer practical skills and strong earning potential without the time commitment of a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing Matt Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles