World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roderick Murray-Smith

Roderick Murray-Smith

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
11939
World Ranking
3874
National Ranking
236

Roderick Murray-Smith publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderick Murray-Smith sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 243 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Roderick Murray-Smith D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderick Murray-Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roderick Murray-Smith is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom and specializes primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research encompasses several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The research topics explored by Murray-Smith cover diverse areas such as AI in cancer detection, Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Interactive and Immersive Displays, Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies, Hand Gesture Recognition Systems, and Tactile and Sensory Interactions.

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • Bayesian parameter estimation using conditional variational autoencoders for gravitational-wave astronomy, 2021, Nature Physics
  • The Fully Convolutional Transformer for Medical Image Segmentation, 2023, 2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
  • What simulation can do for HCI research, 2022, interactions
  • Post-lockdown abatement of COVID-19 by fast periodic switching, 2021, PLoS Computational Biology
  • Prediction of weaning from mechanical ventilation using Convolutional Neural Networks, 2021, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Murray-Smith has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Chaitanya Kaul
  • Joshua Mitton
  • Marco Aversa
  • Sebastian Stein
  • Athanasios Tragakis

Their work has been published across a range of venues with multiple contributions, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Sensors
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • PLoS ONE
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Best Publications

  • Multiple Model Approaches to Modelling and Control

    Roderick Murray-Smith;Tor Arne Johansen

  • Combining Brain-Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges.

    José del R. Millán;Rüdiger Rupp;Gernot Müller-Putz;Rod Murray-Smith

  • On the interpretation and identification of dynamic Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy models

    T.A. Johansen;R. Shorten;R. Murray-Smith

  • Derivative Observations in Gaussian Process Models of Dynamic Systems

    E. Solak;R. Murray-smith;W. E. Leithead;D. J. Leith

  • Gaussian Process Priors with Uncertain Inputs Application to Multiple-Step Ahead Time Series Forecasting

    Agathe Girard;Carl Edward Rasmussen;Joaquin Quiñonero Candela;Roderick Murray-Smith

  • Gaussian process model based predictive control

    J. Kocijan;R. Murray-Smith;C.E. Rasmussen;A. Girard

  • Deep learning for real-time single-pixel video.

    Catherine F. Higham;Roderick Murray-Smith;Miles J. Padgett;Matthew P. Edgar

  • A Dose of Reality: Overcoming Usability Challenges in VR Head-Mounted Displays

    Mark McGill;Daniel Boland;Roderick Murray-Smith;Stephen Brewster

  • Dynamic systems identification with Gaussian processes

    Juš Kocijan;Agathe Girard;Blaž Banko;Roderick Murray-Smith

  • Extending the functional equivalence of radial basis function networks and fuzzy inference systems

    K.J. Hunt;R. Haas;R. Murray-Smith

  • Transmission of natural scene images through a multimode fibre.

    Piergiorgio Caramazza;Oisín Moran;Roderick Murray-Smith;Daniele Faccio

  • Shoogle: excitatory multimodal interaction on mobile devices

    John Williamson;Roderick Murray-Smith;Stephen Hughes

  • Bayesian parameter estimation using conditional variational autoencoders for gravitational-wave astronomy.

    Hunter Gabbard;Chris Messenger;Ik Siong Heng;Francesco Tonolini

  • Shoogle: multimodal excitatory interaction on mobile devices

    J. Williamson;R. Murray-Smith;S. Hughes

  • THE BERLIN BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE PRESENTS THE NOVEL MENTAL TYPEWRITER HEX-O-SPELL

    Benjamin Blankertz;Guido Dornhege;Matthias Krauledat;Michael Schröder

  • GpsTunes: controlling navigation via audio feedback

    Steven Strachan;Parisa Eslambolchilar;Roderick Murray-Smith;Stephen Hughes

  • A note on brain actuated spelling with the Berlin brain-computer interface

    Benjamin Blankertz;Matthias Krauledat;Guido Dornhege;John Williamson

  • A local model network approach to nonlinear modelling

    Roderick Murray-Smith

  • Hierarchical Gaussian process mixtures for regression

    J. Q. Shi;R. Murray-Smith;D. M. Titterington

  • The operating regime approach to nonlinear modelling and control

    T.A. Johansen;R. Murray-Smith

  • Designing for uncertain, asymmetric control: Interaction design for brain-computer interfaces

    J. Williamson;R. Murray-Smith;B. Blankertz;M. Krauledat

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniele Faccio
Daniele Faccio University of Glasgow
Stephen Brewster
Stephen Brewster University of Glasgow
Robert Shorten
Robert Shorten Imperial College London
Carl Edward Rasmussen
Carl Edward Rasmussen University of Cambridge
Matt Jones
Matt Jones Swansea University
Douglas J. Leith
Douglas J. Leith Trinity College Dublin
Tor Arne Johansen
Tor Arne Johansen Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Miles J. Padgett
Miles J. Padgett University of Glasgow
Barak A. Pearlmutter
Barak A. Pearlmutter National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Benjamin Blankertz
Benjamin Blankertz Technical University of Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in Computer Science can open doors to various specialized and high-demand careers. Many students are now considering alternative online programs that complement technical skills and offer greater flexibility. For instance, those seeking to build expertise in analytics might explore the cheapest online data science masters, which provide practical knowledge at an accessible cost.

If you're interested in the intersection of technology and management, the best online construction management degree could be a strong fit for roles that oversee complex, tech-driven projects. Alternatively, advancing to leadership positions in tech companies often calls for solid business acumen. Many professionals choose MBA online programs to gain critical leadership and strategy skills while maintaining their current job.

Time is often a key consideration for working adults. That’s why 1 year masters program options have become increasingly popular, allowing you to level up your qualifications and career prospects quickly. Exploring these online degrees can provide numerous pathways that align with your professional interests in Computer Science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Roderick Murray-Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles