World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
6052
World Ranking
9800
National Ranking
388

Alissa N. Antle publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alissa N. Antle sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 185 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alissa N. Antle D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alissa N. Antle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alissa N. Antle is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of computer science and social sciences. Their research predominantly focuses on innovative human-technology interaction and digital aspects of child development, as well as the intersection of technology with mental health and adolescent populations.

Their work spans several subfields including human-computer interaction, education, information systems, sociology and political science, and applied psychology. Key topics covered in their research include:

  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • ICT in Developing Communities
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Augmented Reality Applications

Recent publications demonstrate a focus on child-computer interaction, emotion regulation through technology, and augmented reality in learning contexts. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Augmented Reality for Early Language Learning: A Systematic Review of Augmented Reality Application Design, Instructional Strategies, and Evaluation Outcomes" (2020), Journal of Educational Computing Research
  • "Designing for Emotion Regulation Interventions: An Agenda for HCI Theory and Research" (2022), ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Diverse perspectives on interdisciplinarity from Members of the College of the Royal Society of Canada" (2020), FACETS
  • "Interactive Technologies for Emotion Regulation Training: A Scoping Review" (2022), International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • "Research in Child-Computer Interaction: Provocations and envisioning future directions" (2021), International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction

Alissa N. Antle frequently collaborates with several scholars including Alexandra Kitson, Jillian L. Warren, Petr Slovák, Nikki Theofanopoulou, and Yumiko Murai.

Their work is published regularly in several venues, with multiple publications in the International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, Interaction Design and Children, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Designing Interactive Systems Conference, and arXiv (Cornell University).

Best Publications

  • Are tangibles more fun?: comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces

    Lesley Xie;Alissa N. Antle;Nima Motamedi

  • Introduction to the special issue on the theory and practice of embodied interaction in HCI and interaction design

    Paul Marshall;Alissa Antle;Elise Van Den Hoven;Yvonne Rogers

  • What the body knows: Exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments

    Alissa N. Antle;Greg Corness;Milena Droumeva

  • The CTI framework: informing the design of tangible systems for children

    Alissa N. Antle

  • Getting Down to Details: Using Theories of Cognition and Learning to Inform Tangible User Interface Design

    Alissa Nicole Antle;Alyssa Friend Wise

  • Embodied metaphors in tangible interaction design

    Saskia Bakker;Alissa N. Antle;Elise Van Den Hoven

  • Futura: design for collaborative learning and game play on a multi-touch digital tabletop

    Alissa N. Antle;Allen Bevans;Theresa Jean Tanenbaum;Katie Seaborn

  • Playing with the sound maker: do embodied metaphors help children learn?

    Alissa N. Antle;Milena Droumeva;Greg Corness

  • Tango cards: a card-based design tool for informing the design of tangible learning games

    Ying Deng;Alissa N. Antle;Carman Neustaedter

  • Hands on what?: comparing children's mouse-based and tangible-based interaction

    Alissa N. Antle;Milena Droumeva;Daniel Ha

  • Developmentally situated design (DSD): making theoretical knowledge accessible to designers of children's technology

    Tilde Bekker;Alissa N. Antle

  • Research opportunities: Embodied child–computer interaction

    Alissa Nicole Antle

  • Child-Computer Interaction

    Janet C. Read;Panos Markopoulos;Narcis Parés;Juan Pablo Hourcade

  • Case study: the design of CBC4Kids' StoryBuilder

    Alissa Antle

  • Child-based personas: need, ability and experience

    Alissa N. Antle

  • Augmented Reality for Early Language Learning: A Systematic Review of Augmented Reality Application Design, Instructional Strategies, and Evaluation Outcomes:

    Min Fan;Alissa N. Antle;Jillian L. Warren

  • Exploring how children use their hands to think: an embodied interactional analysis

    Alissa N. Antle

  • Human-computer-intuition? Exploring the cognitive basis for intuition in embodied interaction

    Alissa Nicole Antle;Greg J. Corness;Milena Droumeva

  • LIFELONG INTERACTIONSEmbodied child computer interaction: why embodiment matters

    Alissa N. Antle

  • MoSo tangibles: evaluating embodied learning

    Saskia Bakker;Elise van den Hoven;Alissa N. Antle

  • Bridging the gap: attribute and spatial metaphors for tangible interface design

    Anna Macaranas;Alissa N. Antle;Bernhard E. Riecke

Frequent Co-Authors

Carman Neustaedter
Carman Neustaedter Simon Fraser University
Alyssa Friend Wise
Alyssa Friend Wise Vanderbilt University
Bernhard E. Riecke
Bernhard E. Riecke Simon Fraser University
Juan Pablo Hourcade
Juan Pablo Hourcade University of Iowa
Elise van den Hoven
Elise van den Hoven University of Technology Sydney
Ron Wakkary
Ron Wakkary Simon Fraser University
Marek Hatala
Marek Hatala Simon Fraser University
Paul Marshall
Paul Marshall University of Bristol
Janet C. Read
Janet C. Read University of Central Lancashire
Panos Markopoulos
Panos Markopoulos Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up a range of flexible and affordable options for studying Computer Science in the USA. Many students seek the cheapest online college programs to minimize tuition costs while still earning a reputable degree.

Admission requirements can vary widely. Some online colleges that accept low gpa offer second chances for students who may not have met traditional academic thresholds but want to begin or continue their education online.

Fast-track programs are also gaining popularity among working professionals or those who want to quickly enter the tech industry. If speed is a priority, consider one of the accelerated computer science degree offerings, which allow you to finish coursework in a reduced timeframe.

Computer Science is just one of many online degree options. If your interests are broader, it’s worth looking into what options exist with other majors, such as discovering what can you get with an environmental science degree. Exploring related pathways ensures you choose a program that aligns with your passions and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Alissa N. Antle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles