World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
57
Citations
36356
World Ranking
2624
National Ranking
930

William R. Rice publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Rice sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 101 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

William R. Rice D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Rice sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

William R. Rice is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within life sciences, focusing particularly on genetic and chromosomal variation, as well as molecular mechanisms involved in DNA maintenance.

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate a focus on centromeres and genetic diversity. Notable publications include "Why Do Centromeres Evolve So Fast: BIR Replication, Hypermutation, Transposition, and Molecular-Drive" (2020, Preprints.org), "Centromeric repeats of the Western European house mouse I: high sequence diversity among monomers at local and global spatial scales" (2020, bioRxiv), and "Centromeric Repeats of the Western European House Mouse II: Selection for High Local Diversity of Monomers and a Hypothesis for Coevolution between Centromere Size and Karyotype Number" (2020, Preprints.org). These works explore the dynamics of centromeric DNA sequence variation and evolutionary processes.

The range of publication venues also includes journals in broader interdisciplinary areas, such as the Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology, Applied Clinical Informatics, and Structural Dynamics. This reflects a diversity in collaborative scopes and research interests.

Frequent co-authors suggest active collaboration across various fields. Notable collaborators include Christopher Mulchay, Haley Goller, Shane P. Stenner, Scott D. Nelson, and Bing Wang, indicating engagements in studies ranging from neuropsychology to information systems and molecular biology.

The main thematic areas in which the scientist contributes include:

  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

These topics correspond with subfields of study encompassing Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Information Systems and Management, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Cognitive Neuroscience. The intersection of molecular biology with psychological and neurocognitive aspects highlights a multidisciplinary approach.

Publication concentration is evident in venues such as the Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology with three publications, followed by two papers in Preprints.org. Other contributions appear in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Applied Clinical Informatics, and Structural Dynamics.

Overall, William R. Rice's body of work represents a blend of genetic and molecular biology research tied to genetic variation, as well as neuropsychological studies related to attention and cognitive function. Their collaborations and publication history indicate a broad interdisciplinary footprint in both fundamental and applied biological sciences.

Best Publications

  • ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS

    William R. Rice

  • SEX CHROMOSOMES AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM.

    William R. Rice

  • Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution

    William R. Rice

  • LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS?

    William R. Rice;Ellen E. Hostert

  • Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions

    Dov F. Sax;John J. Stachowicz;James H. Brown;John F. Bruno

  • PERSPECTIVE: CHASE-AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: ANTAGONISTIC SEDUCTION VERSUS RESISTANCE.

    Brett Holland;William R. Rice

  • Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load

    Brett Holland;William R. Rice

  • Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila.

    Adam K. Chippindale;Jonathan R. Gibson;William R. Rice

  • The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen

    William R. Rice;Brett Holland

  • Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of co-operation

    James J Bull;W. R. Rice

  • THE ACCUMULATION OF SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC GENES AS A SELECTIVE AGENT PROMOTING THE EVOLUTION OF REDUCED RECOMBINATION BETWEEN PRIMITIVE SEX CHROMOSOMES.

    William R. Rice

  • Intersexual ontogenetic conflict

    W. R. Rice;A. K. Chippindale

  • Are all sex chromosomes created equal

    Doris Bachtrog;Mark Kirkpatrick;Judith E. Mank;Stuart F. McDaniel

  • SELECTION OF BENEVOLENCE IN A HOST-PARASITE SYSTEM.

    James J Bull;Ian J Molineux;W. R. Rice

  • Evolution of the Y Sex Chromosome in Animals Y chromosomes evolve through the degeneration of autosomes

    Unknown

  • Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence

    William R. Rice

  • Genetic hitchhiking and the evolution of reduced genetic activity of the Y sex chromosome.

    William R. Rice

  • 'Heads I win, tails you lose': testing directional alternative hypotheses in ecological and evolutionary research.

    William R. Rice;Steven D. Gaines

  • Population-based resequencing of experimentally evolved populations reveals the genetic basis of body size variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

    Thomas L. Turner;Andrew D. Stewart;Andrew T. Fields;William R. Rice

  • Experimental tests of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination

    William R. Rice

  • Speciation via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character

    William R. Rice

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergey Gavrilets
Sergey Gavrilets University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Edward H. Morrow
Edward H. Morrow University of Sussex
Steven D. Gaines
Steven D. Gaines University of California, Santa Barbara
Richard K. Grosberg
Richard K. Grosberg University of California, Davis
James J. Bull
James J. Bull University of Idaho
Nicole Valenzuela
Nicole Valenzuela Iowa State University
Ian J. Molineux
Ian J. Molineux The University of Texas at Austin
Doris Bachtrog
Doris Bachtrog University of California, Berkeley
Judith E. Mank
Judith E. Mank University of British Columbia
J. Chris Pires
J. Chris Pires Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open the door to a range of interdisciplinary careers, both within and beyond the life sciences. Many students consider related online degrees as a flexible way to gain new credentials or pivot to in-demand fields.

Some professionals start in non-science areas and seek to transition. If you’re interested in this approach, look into online bridge programs non-SLP majors, which show how individuals can move into specialized areas through tailored prerequisite courses.

Similarly, healthcare offers accelerated options for career changers. Programs like accelerated nursing programs for non nurses help those with unrelated bachelor’s degrees become qualified nurses quickly.

Career outcomes and earning potential are also key considerations. For example, if you’re comparing roles, reviewing psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state can illustrate how specialties and locations impact pay.

Interested in fast-tracking your training? You may ask how long to become a nurse practitioner and discover timelines for entering advanced practice roles. These pathways demonstrate that online degrees offer enhanced flexibility and diverse options for students in Ecology, Evolution, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing William R. Rice

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles