World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5055
World Ranking
9877
National Ranking
5215

Rachel H. Thompson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel H. Thompson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rachel H. Thompson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel H. Thompson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Developmental psychology
  • Social psychology
  • Reinforcement

Rachel H. Thompson spends much of her time researching Functional analysis, Reinforcement, Developmental psychology, Extinction and Self-destructive behavior. Her study focuses on the intersection of Functional analysis and fields such as Set with connections in the field of Visual inspection and Reliability. Much of her study explores Reinforcement relationship to Treatment outcome.

Rachel H. Thompson is involved in the study of Developmental psychology that focuses on Aggression in particular. Her work focuses on many connections between Aggression and other disciplines, such as Developmental disorder, that overlap with her field of interest in Descriptive statistics. Her studies in Extinction integrate themes in fields like Functional Communication, Cognitive psychology and Operant conditioning.

Her most cited work include:

  • REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE THINNING FOLLOWING TREATMENT WITH FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING (206 citations)
  • Skill acquisition in the implementation of functional analysis methodology. (205 citations)
  • TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURED CRITERIA FOR INTERPRETATION OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS DATA (162 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary scientific interests are in Developmental psychology, Reinforcement, Functional analysis, Extinction and Autism. The Punishment research Rachel H. Thompson does as part of her general Developmental psychology study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Psychological intervention, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. Her Reinforcement study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Behavior disorder and Crying.

Rachel H. Thompson has researched Functional analysis in several fields, including Behavioral assessment, Cognitive psychology and Aggression. Her Extinction study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Functional Communication, Motivating operation, Operant conditioning and Behavior change. Her work in the fields of Autism, such as Autism spectrum disorder and Repetitive behavior, overlaps with other areas such as Motor Stereotypy.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Developmental psychology (78.12%)
  • Reinforcement (59.38%)
  • Functional analysis (28.12%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Developmental psychology (78.12%)
  • Autism (18.75%)
  • Psychological intervention (12.50%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Rachel H. Thompson focuses on Developmental psychology, Autism, Psychological intervention, Social psychology and Social skills. Her Developmental psychology research incorporates elements of Variety, Social validity and Generality. Her work on Repetitive behavior and Autism spectrum disorder as part of general Autism study is frequently connected to Behavioral variability and False belief, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.

Her Autism spectrum disorder study incorporates themes from Interpersonal communication, Tact, Active listening and Behavior change. Rachel H. Thompson frequently studies issues relating to Reinforcement and Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Many of her studies involve connections with topics such as Set and Reinforcement.

Between 2013 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Behavioral variability and autism spectrum disorder. (42 citations)
  • Teaching children with autism to respond to conversation partners' interest. (25 citations)
  • Contingency analysis of caregiver behavior: Implications for parent training and future directions (20 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Developmental psychology
  • Social psychology
  • Psychotherapist

Rachel H. Thompson mainly investigates Developmental psychology, Autism, Autism spectrum disorder, Skills training and Skill development. The study incorporates disciplines such as Variety and Control in addition to Developmental psychology. In the subject of general Autism, her work in Repetitive behavior is often linked to Applied research, Response Variability, Invariant and Behavioral variability, thereby combining diverse domains of study.

Her research in Autism spectrum disorder intersects with topics in Tact, Social skills, Active listening and Behavior change. There are a combination of areas like Improved performance, Multiple baseline design, Applied psychology, Graduate students and Baseline integrated together with her Skills training study.

Best Publications

  • Skill acquisition in the implementation of functional analysis methodology.

    Brian A. Iwata;Michele D. Wallace;Sung Woo Kahng;Jana S. Lindberg

  • REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE THINNING FOLLOWING TREATMENT WITH FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING

    Gregory P. Hanley;Brian A. Iwata;Rachel H. Thompson

  • TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURED CRITERIA FOR INTERPRETATION OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS DATA

    Louis P. Hagopian;Wayne W. Fisher;Rachel H. Thompson;Jamie Owen-Deschryver

  • A comparison of outcomes from descriptive and functional analyses of problem behavior.

    Rachel H Thompson;Brian A Iwata

  • Facilitating Tolerance of Delayed Reinforcement during Functional Communication Training.

    Wayne W. Fisher;Rachel H. Thompson;Louis P. Hagopian;Lynn G. Bowman

  • On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.

    Wayne W. Fisher;Rachel H. Thompson;Cathleen C. Piazza;Kimberly Crosland

  • Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training

    Wayne W. Fisher;David E. Kuhn;Rachel H. Thompson

  • On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior

    Lynn G. Bowman;Wayne W. Fisher;Rachel H. Thompson;Cathleen C. Piazza

  • Effects of continuous and intermittent reinforcement for problem behavior during functional communication training.

    April S. Worsdell;Brian A. Iwata;Gregory P. Hanley;Rachel H. Thompson

  • Differential responding in the presence and absence of discriminative stimuli during multielement functional analyses.

    Juliet Conners;Brian A. Iwata;Sung Woo Kahng;Gregory P. Hanley

  • The evaluation and treatment of aggression maintained by attention and automatic reinforcement.

    Rachel H. Thompson;Wayne W. Fisher;Cathleen C. Piazza;David E. Kuhn

  • A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWING PROBLEM BEHAVIOR

    Rachel H. Thompson;Brian A. Iwata

  • RESURGENCE OF INFANT CAREGIVING RESPONSES

    Jennifer L. Bruzek;Jennifer L. Bruzek;Rachel H. Thompson;Rachel H. Thompson;Lindsay C. Peters

  • A component analysis of "stereotypy as reinforcement" for alternative behavior.

    Gregory P. Hanley;Brian A. Iwata;Rachel H. Thompson;Jana S. Lindberg

  • A REVIEW OF REINFORCEMENT CONTROL PROCEDURES

    Rachel H. Thompson;Brian A. Iwata

  • Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation

    Wayne W. Fisher;Steven E. Lindauer;Cindy J. Alterson;Rachel H. Thompson

  • TEACHER REPORT AND DIRECT ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR YOUNG CHILDREN

    Catherine A. Cote;Rachel H. Thompson;Gregory P. Hanley;Paige M. McKerchar

  • Enhancing early communication through infant sign training.

    Rachel H Thompson;Nicole M Cotnoir-Bichelman;Paige M McKerchar;Trista L Tate

  • A METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING SATIATION VERSUS EXTINCTION EFFECTS UNDER NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES

    Sung Woo Kahng;Brian A. Iwata;Rachel H. Thompson;Gregory P. Hanley

  • FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS AND TREATMENT OF DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR MAINTAINED BY TERMINATION OF “DON'T” (AND SYMMETRICAL “DO”) REQUESTS

    Wayne W. Fisher;John D. Adelinis;Rachel H. Thompson;April S. Worsdell

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian A. Iwata
Brian A. Iwata University of Florida
Wayne W. Fisher
Wayne W. Fisher Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Gregory P. Hanley
Gregory P. Hanley Western New England University
Sung Woo Kahng
Sung Woo Kahng Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Louis P. Hagopian
Louis P. Hagopian Kennedy Krieger Institute
Cathleen C. Piazza
Cathleen C. Piazza Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John Hart
John Hart University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Iser G. DeLeon
Iser G. DeLeon University of Florida
David P. Wacker
David P. Wacker University of Iowa
Jennifer R. Zarcone
Jennifer R. Zarcone Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology offers flexible options for aspiring professionals. Graduates can pursue diverse career pathways, including becoming licensed therapists, counselors, or mental health specialists. Online programs often cover key areas such as counseling theories, human development, and ethical practice, which are foundational for advanced roles in the field.

For those interested in clinical practice, it’s important to understand the requirements in your locality. For example, you can read about how to become a licensed therapist in Norfolk and explore the specific educational paths and supervised practice hours needed. Requirements can differ greatly; see the North Las Vegas licensed therapist education requirements for comparison.

Each city or state may have unique steps for certification. For instance, learn about how to become a licensed therapist in Oakland or review Oklahoma City licensed therapist requirements to understand the varied pathways and licensing procedures. Investigating the steps in your preferred location will help you efficiently plan your education and career trajectory.

Best Scientists Citing Rachel H. Thompson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles