World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
13411
World Ranking
3146
National Ranking
1784

David P. Wacker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Wacker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

David P. Wacker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Wacker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David P. Wacker is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in psychology, neuroscience, and medicine. Their work spans several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, psychiatry and mental health, education, and clinical psychology.

Their research mainly focuses on autism spectrum disorder and behavioral and psychological studies, with additional interests in family and disability support, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, child nutrition and feeding issues, child development and digital technology, and cerebral palsy and movement disorders.

Frequent publication venues for David P. Wacker include:

  • Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
  • Behavioral Interventions
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
  • Behavior Modification

Frequently collaborating coauthors are:

  • Kelly M. Schieltz
  • Scott D. Lindgren
  • Patrick W. Romani
  • Matthew J. O'Brien
  • Wendy K. Berg

Notable recent papers by David P. Wacker include:

  • "A Randomized Controlled Trial of Functional Communication Training via Telehealth for Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder" (2020) published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • "Functional assessment and function-based treatment delivered via telehealth: A brief summary" (2020) published in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
  • "Delivering Interventions Via Telehealth: Functional Communication Training with a Child with Autism as a Case Example" (2020) published in Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
  • "A comparative effectiveness trial of functional behavioral assessment methods" (2023) published in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
  • "Parent Ratings of Generalized and Indirect Effects of Functional Communication Training for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder" (2021) published in Behavior Modification

Best Publications

  • A BRIEF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF AGGRESSIVE AND ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIOR IN AN OUTCLINIC SETTING

    John Northup;David Wacker;Gary Sasso;Mark Steege

  • BRIEF FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES TO EVALUATE ABERRANT BEHAVIOR IN AN OUTPATIENT SETTING: A SUMMARY OF 79 CASES

    K M Derby;D P Wacker;G Sasso;M Steege;M Steege

  • Acceptability of Behavioral Interventions: A Review of the Literature

    Thomas M. Reimers;David P. Wacker;Gina Koeppl

  • A component analysis of functional communication training across three topographies of severe behavior problems.

    David P. Wacker;Mark W. Steege;John Northup;Gary M. Sasso

  • Telehealth and Autism: Treating Challenging Behavior at Lower Cost

    Scott Lindgren;Scott Lindgren;David Wacker;David Wacker;Alyssa Suess;Alyssa Suess;Kelly Schieltz

  • Parents' Ratings of the Acceptability of Behavioral Treatment Recommendations Made in an Outpatient Clinic: A Preliminary Analysis of the Influence of Treatment Effectiveness:

    Thomas M. Reimers;David P. Wacker

  • Use of descriptive and experimental analyses to identify the functional properties of aberrant behavior in school settings.

    Gary M. Sasso;Thomas M. Reimers;Linda J. Cooper;David Wacker

  • Conducting Functional Communication Training via Telehealth to Reduce the Problem Behavior of Young Children with Autism

    David P. Wacker;John F. Lee;Yaniz C. Padilla Dalmau;Todd G. Kopelman

  • TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURED CRITERIA FOR INTERPRETATION OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS DATA

    Louis P. Hagopian;Wayne W. Fisher;Rachel H. Thompson;Jamie Owen-Deschryver

  • ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF TASK PREFERENCES, TASK DEMANDS, AND ADULT ATTENTION ON CHILD BEHAVIOR IN OUTPATIENT AND CLASSROOM SETTINGS

    Linda J. Cooper;David P. Wacker;Deanna Thursby;Lee Ann Plagmann

  • Acceptability of behavioral treatments for children: Analog and naturalistic evaluations by parents.

    Thomas M. Reimers;David P. Wacker;Linda J. Cooper;Agnes O. de Raad

  • USING PARENTS AS THERAPISTS TO EVALUATE APPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR OF THEIR CHILDREN: APPLICATION TO A TERTIARY DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC

    Linda J. Cooper;David P. Wacker;Gary M. Sasso;Thomas M. Reimers

  • Conducting functional analyses of problem behavior via telehealth.

    David P. Wacker;John F. Lee;Yaniz C. Padilla Dalmau;Todd G. Kopelman

  • An evaluation of persistence of treatment effects during long-term treatment of destructive behavior.

    David P Wacker;Jay W Harding;Wendy K Berg;John F Lee

  • THE TREATMENT OF SEVERE BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS IN SCHOOL SETTINGS USING A TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE MODEL

    John Northup;David P. Wacker;Wendy K. Berg;Laura Kelly

  • Effects of picture prompts on the acquisition of complex vocational tasks by mentally retarded adolescents.

    David P. Wacker;Wendy K. Berg

  • The Use of Behavioral Assessment to Prescribe and Evaluate Treatments for Severely Handicapped Children.

    Mark W. Steege;David P. Wacker;Wendy K. Berg;Karla K. Cigrand

  • THE LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING IN HOME SETTINGS

    K M Derby;David P Wacker;W Berg;A DeRaad

  • Communicative Alternatives to Challenging Behavior: Integrating Functional Assessment and Intervention Strategies

    Joe Reichle;David P. Wacker

  • USE OF COMPONENT ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY ACTIVE VARIABLES IN TREATMENT PACKAGES FOR CHILDREN WITH FEEDING DISORDERS

    Linda J. Cooper;David P. Wacker;Jennifer J. McComas;Kimberly Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Wendy K. Berg
Wendy K. Berg University of Iowa
Kennon A. Lattal
Kennon A. Lattal West Virginia University
Wayne W. Fisher
Wayne W. Fisher Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Glen Dunlap
Glen Dunlap University of South Florida
John A. Nevin
John A. Nevin University of New Hampshire
Timothy R. Vollmer
Timothy R. Vollmer University of Florida
V. Mark Durand
V. Mark Durand University of South Florida St. Petersburg
Nancy A. Neef
Nancy A. Neef The Ohio State University
Timothy A. Shahan
Timothy A. Shahan Utah State University
Rachel H. Thompson
Rachel H. Thompson Western New England University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape for online psychology degrees in the USA is rapidly evolving. Choosing the right program is crucial, whether you're looking for flexibility, affordability, or a quicker path to graduation. Many seek easiest online psychology programs in the South for approachable coursework and regionally tailored content. Others aim for the easiest online psychology degree programs in Texas that balance cost, completion time, and support services.

Geographic location can influence not only tuition but also networking and career opportunities. For those in the Midwest, reviewing the easiest online psychology degrees in Wisconsin can reveal programs with strong local connections. If your priority is to enter the workforce quickly, the fastest online psychology degrees in Arizona focus on accelerated pathways.

By exploring these options, students can strategically select degrees that align with their career goals, timeframe, and personal circumstances. Whether planning a career in counseling, research, or human resources, the right online program can open new doors in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing David P. Wacker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles