World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
12429
World Ranking
3884
National Ranking
2177

Gregory P. Hanley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory P. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gregory P. Hanley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory P. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gregory P. Hanley is affiliated with Western New England University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on behavioral and psychological studies, with significant contributions to autism spectrum disorder research and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

The scientist has an extensive publication record in the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Within psychology, their work spans developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, psychiatry, and mental health. In neuroscience, the emphasis lies in cognitive neuroscience.

Gregory P. Hanley frequently publishes in several academic venues, including the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Behavior Analysis in Practice, European Journal of Behavior Analysis, International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, and Education and Treatment of Children.

Notable recent papers authored by Hanley include:

  • Toward trauma-informed applications of behavior analysis, 2021, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
  • Functional communication training: From efficacy to effectiveness, 2020, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
  • Minimizing Escalation by Treating Dangerous Problem Behavior Within an Enhanced Choice Model, 2021, Behavior Analysis in Practice
  • A new adaptation of the Interview-Informed Synthesized Contingency Analyses (IISCA): The performance-based IISCA, 2022, European Journal of Behavior Analysis
  • A Two Step Validation of the Performance-Based IISCA: A Trauma-Informed Functional Analysis Model, 2023, Behavior Analysis in Practice

Collaborations have been consistent with several researchers, with frequent coauthors including Kelsey W. Ruppel, Adithyan Rajaraman, Holly C. Gover, Joshua Jessel, and Robin Landa. These partnerships reflect overlapping interests in applied behavior analysis and related fields.

The main topics covered in Hanley's work can be summarized as follows:

  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Community Health and Development
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments

Best Publications

  • FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR: A REVIEW

    Gregory P. Hanley;Brian A. Iwata;Brandon E. McCord

  • Functional communication training: a review and practical guide.

    Jeffrey H Tiger;Gregory P Hanley;Jennifer Bruzek

  • Producing meaningful improvements in problem behavior of children with autism via synthesized analyses and treatments

    Gregory P. Hanley;C. Sandy Jin;Nicholas R. Vanselow;Laura A. Hanratty

  • Functional Assessment of Problem Behavior: Dispelling Myths, Overcoming Implementation Obstacles, and Developing New Lore

    Gregory P Hanley

  • Skill acquisition in the implementation of functional analysis methodology.

    Brian A. Iwata;Michele D. Wallace;Sung Woo Kahng;Jana S. Lindberg

  • REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE THINNING FOLLOWING TREATMENT WITH FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING

    Gregory P. Hanley;Brian A. Iwata;Rachel H. Thompson

  • An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.

    Cathleen C. Piazza;John D. Adelinis;Gregory P. Hanley;Han Leong Goh

  • ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AND PREFERENCE FOR PUNISHMENT AND EXTINCTION COMPONENTS OF FUNCTION‐BASED INTERVENTIONS

    Gregory P. Hanley;Cathleen C. Piazza;Wayne W. Fisher;Kristen A. Maglieri

  • Treatment of pica through multiple analyses of its reinforcing functions.

    Cathleen C. Piazza;Wayne W. Fisher;Gregory P. Hanley;Linda A. LeBlanc

  • Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.

    Gregory P. Hanley;Cathleen C. Piazza;Wayne W. Fisher;Stephanie A. Contrucci

  • FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS AND TREATMENT OF CIGARETTE PICA

    Cathleen C. Piazza;Gregory P. Hanley;Wayne W. Fisher

  • Toward Effective and Preferred Programming: A Case for the Objective Measurement of Social Validity with Recipients of Behavior-Change Programs

    Gregory P. Hanley

  • Evaluation of a Classwide Teaching Program for Developing Preschool Life Skills

    Gregory P Hanley;Nicole A Heal;Jeffrey H Tiger;Einar T Ingvarsson

  • THE USE OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT IN THE TREATMENT OF ESCAPE-MAINTAINED DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR

    Cathleen C. Piazza;Wayne W. Fisher;Gregory P. Hanley;Matthew L. Remick

  • An evaluation of the value of choice with preschool children.

    Jeffrey H Tiger;Gregory P Hanley;Emma Hernandez

  • Effects of continuous and intermittent reinforcement for problem behavior during functional communication training.

    April S. Worsdell;Brian A. Iwata;Gregory P. Hanley;Rachel H. Thompson

  • NONCONTINGENT PRESENTATION OF ATTENTION AND ALTERNATIVE STIMULI IN THE TREATMENT OF ATTENTION-MAINTAINED DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR

    Gregory P. Hanley;Cathleen C. Piazza;Cathleen C. Piazza;Wayne W. Fisher

  • Differential responding in the presence and absence of discriminative stimuli during multielement functional analyses.

    Juliet Conners;Brian A. Iwata;Sung Woo Kahng;Gregory P. Hanley

  • Interview-informed synthesized contingency analyses: Thirty replications and reanalysis.

    Joshua Jessel;Gregory P. Hanley;Mahshid Ghaemmaghami

  • Some Determinants of Changes in Preference over Time.

    Gregory P Hanley;Brian A Iwata;Eileen M Roscoe

Frequent Co-Authors

Cathleen C. Piazza
Cathleen C. Piazza Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Brian A. Iwata
Brian A. Iwata University of Florida
Wayne W. Fisher
Wayne W. Fisher Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Rachel H. Thompson
Rachel H. Thompson Western New England University
Sung Woo Kahng
Sung Woo Kahng Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
William V. Dube
William V. Dube University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Gregory J. Madden
Gregory J. Madden Utah State University
Kennon A. Lattal
Kennon A. Lattal West Virginia University
Timothy R. Vollmer
Timothy R. Vollmer University of Florida
Louis P. Hagopian
Louis P. Hagopian Kennedy Krieger Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up diverse career pathways, especially in the field of counseling and mental health. Many students use online psychology degrees as a foundation for specialized roles such as substance abuse counseling. However, requirements for these careers can differ significantly by location.

For those interested in working with individuals struggling with addiction, it's vital to understand the local guidelines and credentials. For example, learn about substance abuse counselor requirements in Philadelphia, which may differ from other cities. Similarly, if you're considering becoming a substance abuse counselor in Phoenix, familiarize yourself with state-specific licensing processes.

Exploring the paths to how to become a substance abuse counselor in Pittsburgh or becoming a substance abuse counselor in Plano can also help prospective students understand the education needed, clinical experience requirements, and potential career progression. Comparing these options ensures you can tailor your education and professional development to your goals and local regulations.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory P. Hanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles