World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9779 9151 5174 4724 85 6161

Iser G. DeLeon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Iser G. DeLeon between 1994 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Iser G. DeLeon published across 31 years, from 1994 to 2024, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2000. 8 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2000. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications
1994 2024

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Iser G. DeLeon: publications per year, 1994 to 2024
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 5
1998 0
1999 5
2000 8
2001 3
2002 2
2003 2
2004 4
2005 4
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 3
2010 2
2011 3
2012 1
2013 6
2014 3
2015 4
2016 3
2017 4
2018 3
2019 0
2020 2
2021 1
2022 4
2023 2
2024 6
Total 86
Download as CSV

Iser G. DeLeon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iser G. DeLeon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 85 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 85
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Iser G. DeLeon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iser G. DeLeon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Iser G. DeLeon is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on behavioral and psychological studies. Within these broad areas, their work emphasizes developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and aspects of economics and econometrics.

The main topics of DeLeon's research include behavioral and psychological studies, autism spectrum disorder research, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, child nutrition and feeding issues, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and economic and environmental valuation.

DeLeon has published extensively, with recent papers highlighting various aspects of applied behavior analysis and intervention strategies. Notable publications include:

  • The mitigating effects of enhanced reinforcer magnitude and quality on treatment degradation, 2022, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
  • Assessing Parameters of Reinforcement on Efficiency of Acquisition: A Systematic Review, 2022, Behavior Analysis in Practice
  • Examining patterns suggestive of acquisition during functional analyses: A consecutive controlled series of 116 cases, 2024, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
  • Increasing selection of and engagement in physical activity in children with autism spectrum disorder, 2022, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
  • Framing Effects on Hypothetical Use of Public Transportation: A Time Cost Demand Analysis, 2023, Behavior and Social Issues

The frequent co-authors collaborating with DeLeon include Nathalie Fernandez, Tracy Argueta, Sarah C. Weinsztok, Kissel J. Goldman, and Michelle A. Frank-Crawford. These collaborations reflect a network of researchers contributing to similar fields and topics related to applied behavior analysis and developmental psychology.

DeLeon's work has appeared in leading publication venues with repeated contributions to the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Behavioral Interventions, and Behavior Analysis in Practice. Other venues include Behavior and Social Issues and Behavior Analysis Research and Practice, illustrating a consistent focus on behavior analysis and interventions.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

    Iser G. DeLeon;Brian A. Iwata

  • Reliability and validity of the functional analysis screening tool.

    Brian A. Iwata;Iser G. DeLeon;Eileen M. Roscoe

  • Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome

    Jamie O. Edgin;Gina M. Mason;Melissa J. Allman;George T. Capone

  • Self-injurious behavior: Gene-brain-behavior relationships

    Stephen R. Schroeder;Mary Lou Oster-Granite;Gershon Berkson;James W. Bodfish

  • An analysis of the reinforcing properties of hand mouthing.

    Han-Leong Goh;Brian A. Iwata;Bridget A. Shore;Iser G. DeLeon

  • An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses.

    Bridget A. Shore;Brian A. Iwata;Iser G. DeLeon;Sung Woo Kahng

  • Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.

    Iser G. Deleon;Brian A. Iwata;Eileen M. Roscoe

  • INITIAL FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OUTCOMES AND MODIFICATIONS IN PURSUIT OF DIFFERENTIATION: A SUMMARY OF 176 INPATIENT CASES

    Louis P. Hagopian;Griffin W. Rooker;Joshua Jessel;Iser G. DeLeon

  • EXAMINATION OF RELATIVE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS OF STIMULI IDENTIFIED THROUGH PRETREATMENT AND DAILY BRIEF PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS

    Iser G. Deleon;Wayne W. Fisher;Vanessa Rodriguez-Catter;Kristen Maglieri

  • EXAMINATION OF AMBIGUOUS STIMULUS PREFERENCES WITH DURATION‐BASED MEASURES

    Iser G. DeLeon;Brian A. Iwata;Juliet Conners;Michele D. Wallace

  • Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarity.

    Iser G. DeLeon;Brian A. Iwata;Han Leong Goh;April S. Worsdell

  • Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior

    Iser G. Deleon;Pamela L. Neidert;Bonita M. Anders;Vanessa Rodriguez-Catter

  • Competition between noncontingent and contingent reinforcement schedules during response acquisition.

    Han Leong Goh;Brian A. Iwata;Iser G. DeLeon

  • Psychophysical assessment of timing in individuals with autism.

    Melissa J. Allman;Iser G. DeLeon;John H. Wearden

  • EFFECTS OF NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT ON PROBLEM BEHAVIOR AND STIMULUS ENGAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF SATIATION, EXTINCTION, AND ALTERNATIVE REINFORCEMENT

    Louis P. Hagopian;Jennifer L. Crockett;Maureen van Stone;Iser G. Deleon

  • Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training.

    Sung Woo Kahng;Brian A. Iwata;Iser G. DeLeon;April S. Worsdell

  • A COMPARISON OF PROCEDURES FOR PROGRAMMING NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES

    Sung Woo Kahng;Brian A. Iwata;Iser G. DeLeon;Michele D. Wallace

  • On the correspondence between preference assessment outcomes and progressive-ratio schedule assessments of stimulus value.

    Iser G. DeLeon;Michelle A. Frank;Meagan K. Gregory;Melissa J. Allman

  • EFFECTS OF INTERMITTENT PUNISHMENT ON SELF‐INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR: AN EVALUATION OF SCHEDULE THINNING

    Dorothea C. Lerman;Brian A. Iwata;Bridget A. Shore;Iser G. DeLeon

  • Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention-maintained behavior through noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment

    Wayne W. Fisher;Iser G. DeLeon;Vanessa Rodriguez-Catter;Kris M. Keeney

  • The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior

    Wayne W. Fisher;Julia T. O'Connor;Patricia F. Kurtz;Iser G. DeLeon

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian A. Iwata
Brian A. Iwata University of Florida
Wayne W. Fisher
Wayne W. Fisher Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sung Woo Kahng
Sung Woo Kahng Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Louis P. Hagopian
Louis P. Hagopian Kennedy Krieger Institute
Michael F. Cataldo
Michael F. Cataldo Kennedy Krieger Institute
A. Charles Catania
A. Charles Catania University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Dorothea C. Lerman
Dorothea C. Lerman University of Houston - Clear Lake
Jamie O. Edgin
Jamie O. Edgin Virginia Tech
Roger H. Reeves
Roger H. Reeves Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Stephanie L. Sherman
Stephanie L. Sherman Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to diverse roles in healthcare, education, research, and business. Online psychology degrees allow greater flexibility and accessibility, making it easier for students across the country to pursue their dreams.

When evaluating programs, it’s important to consider accreditation, faculty expertise, and support services. For students in Texas, reviewing the best online psychology degree programs ranking in Texas can help identify top options. Likewise, those located in Pennsylvania can find their best fit through the best online psychology degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania.

Alternatively, for those in California, the online psychology degrees in San Diego offer specialized opportunities in a vibrant metropolitan area. Searching for programs with national reach? Explore a broad array of options with this guide to online psychology programs in USA.

With so many choices, students can find the perfect online degree to launch their psychology career, pursue advanced studies, or make an impact in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Iser G. DeLeon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles