World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
49
Citations
7741
World Ranking
4400
National Ranking
1259

Jonathan P. Mathews publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Mathews sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 133 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Jonathan P. Mathews D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Mathews sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Chemical Society

Overview

Jonathan P. Mathews is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with a concentration in several subfields including Ocean Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Geochemistry and Petrology, Mechanics of Materials, and Inorganic Chemistry.

Their work covers a range of topics notably involving Coal Properties and Utilization, Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes, Coal and Its By-products, Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis, and Radioactive element chemistry and processing.

Jonathan P. Mathews has been published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include Fuel, Energy & Fuels, Carbon, SSRN Electronic Journal, and the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

Some of the recent papers by Jonathan P. Mathews include:

  • "Implications of the in situ stress distribution for coalbed methane zonation and hydraulic fracturing in multiple seams, western Guizhou, China", 2021, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
  • "Quantifying the Structural Transitions of Chinese Coal to Coal-Derived Natural Graphite by XRD, Raman Spectroscopy, and HRTEM Image Analyses", 2021, Energy & Fuels
  • "A large-scale molecular model of Fenghuangshan anthracite coal", 2021, Fuel
  • "Structure and partial ordering of terrestrial kerogen: Insight from high-resolution transmission electron microscopy", 2020, Fuel
  • "Deformation-related coalification: Significance for deformation within shallow crust", 2022, International Journal of Coal Geology

Frequent co-authors of Jonathan P. Mathews include Yu Song, Ercan Cakmak, Edgar Lara-Curzio, Pilsun Yoo, and Valentina Sierra-Jiménez.

Jonathan P. Mathews was awarded Fellow of the American Chemical Society in 2016.

Best Publications

  • The molecular representations of coal – A review

    Jonathan P Mathews;Alan Loyd Chaffee

  • Combustion of an Illinois No. 6 coal char simulated using an atomistic char representation and the ReaxFF reactive force field

    Fidel Castro-Marcano;Amar M. Kamat;Michael F. Russo;Adri C.T. van Duin

  • Chemical–structural properties of South African bituminous coals: insights from wide angle XRD–carbon fraction analysis, ATR–FTIR, solid state 13C NMR, and HRTEM techniques

    Gregory N. Okolo;Hein W.J.P. Neomagus;Raymond C. Everson;Mokone J. Roberts

  • A comparative evaluation of coal specific surface area by CO2 and N2 adsorption and its influence on CH4 adsorption capacity at different pore sizes

    Junlong Zhao;Hao Xu;Dazhen Tang;Jonathan P. Mathews

  • The utility of coal molecular models

    Jonathan P. Mathews;Adri C.T. van Duin;Alan L. Chaffee

  • Molecular representations of Permian-aged vitrinite-rich and inertinite-rich South African coals

    Daniel Van Niekerk;Jonathan P. Mathews

  • Permeability evolution in fractured coal — Combining triaxial confinement with X-ray computed tomography, acoustic emission and ultrasonic techniques

    Yidong Cai;Dameng Liu;Jonathan P. Mathews;Zhejun Pan

  • Structural characterization of vitrinite-rich and inertinite-rich Permian-aged South African bituminous coals

    Daniel Van Niekerk;Ronald J. Pugmire;Mark S. Solum;Paul C. Painter

  • A review of the application of X-ray computed tomography to the study of coal

    Jonathan P. Mathews;Quentin P. Campbell;Hao Xu;Phillip Halleck

  • Pyrolysis of a large-scale molecular model for Illinois no. 6 coal using the ReaxFF reactive force field

    Fidel Castro-Marcano;Michael F. Russo;Adri C.T. van Duin;Jonathan P. Mathews

  • Molecular Size of Asphaltene Solubility Fractions

    Henning Groenzin;Oliver C. Mullins;Semih Eser;Jonathan P. Mathews

  • Sorption Capacity and Sorption Kinetic Measurements of CO2 and CH4 in Confined and Unconfined Bituminous Coal

    J. Denis N. Pone;Phillip M. Halleck;Jonathan P. Mathews

  • Dissolution and dispersion of coal in ionic liquids

    Paul Painter;Nuerxida Pulati;Ruveyda Cetiner;Maria Sobkowiak

  • A molecular model for Illinois No. 6 Argonne Premium coal: Moving toward capturing the continuum structure

    Fidel Castro-Marcano;Vladislav V. Lobodin;Ryan P. Rodgers;Amy M. McKenna

  • Inducing fractures and increasing cleat apertures in a bituminous coal under isotropic stress via application of microwave energy

    Hemant Kumar;Edward Lester;Sam Kingman;Richard Bourne

  • Coal seam porosity and fracture heterogeneity of macrolithotypes in the Hancheng Block, eastern margin, Ordos Basin, China

    Junlong Zhao;Hao Xu;Dazhen Tang;Jonathan P. Mathews

  • The structural alignment of coal and the analogous case of Argonne Upper Freeport coal

    Jonathan P. Mathews;Atul Sharma

  • Soot and char molecular representations generated directly from HRTEM lattice fringe images using Fringe3D

    Victor Fernandez-Alos;Justin K. Watson;Randy vander Wal;Jonathan P. Mathews

  • Simulation of nanoporous carbons: a chemically constrained structure

    Madhav Acharya;Michael S. Strano;Jonathan P. Mathews;Simon J. L. Billinge

  • Determining the molecular weight distribution of Pocahontas No. 3 low-volatile bituminous coal utilizing HRTEM and laser desorption ionization mass spectra data

    Jonathan P. Mathews;Victor Fernandez-Also;A. Daniel Jones;Harold H. Schobert

  • Influence of maceral composition on the structure, properties and behaviour of chars derived from South African coals

    Mokone J. Roberts;Raymond C. Everson;Hein W.J.P. Neomagus;Daniel Van Niekerk

  • Optimizing enhanced coalbed methane recovery for unhindered production and CO2 injectivity

    Hemant Kumar;Derek Elsworth;Jishan Liu;Denis Pone

  • Permeability evolution in sorbing media: analogies between organic‐rich shale and coal

    H. Kumar;H. Kumar;D. Elsworth;J.P. Mathews;C. Marone

  • 3D characterization of coal strains induced by compression, carbon dioxide sorption, and desorption at in-situ stress conditions

    J. Denis N. Pone;Phillip M. Halleck;Jonathan P. Mathews

  • Molecular dynamic simulation of coal-solvent interactions in Permian-aged South African coals

    Daniel Van Niekerk;Jonathan P. Mathews

  • ReaxFF simulations of petroleum coke sulfur removal mechanisms during pyrolysis and combustion

    Qifan Zhong;Qifan Zhong;Qiuyun Mao;Jin Xiao;Adri C.T. van Duin

  • Molecular exchange of ch4 and co2 in coal: Enhanced coalbed methane on a nanoscale

    Tim J. Tambach;Jonathan P. Mathews;Frank van Bergen

  • High-resolution X-ray computed tomography observations of the thermal drying of lump-sized subbituminous coal

    Jonathan P. Mathews;J. Denis N. Pone;Gareth D. Mitchell;Phillip Halleck

Frequent Co-Authors

Derek Elsworth
Derek Elsworth Pennsylvania State University
Hein W.J.P. Neomagus
Hein W.J.P. Neomagus North-West University
Adri C. T. van Duin
Adri C. T. van Duin Pennsylvania State University
Patrick G. Hatcher
Patrick G. Hatcher Old Dominion University
Paul C. Painter
Paul C. Painter Pennsylvania State University
Hao Xu
Hao Xu China University of Geosciences
Dazhen Tang
Dazhen Tang China University of Geosciences
Jishan Liu
Jishan Liu University of Western Australia
Chunshan Song
Chunshan Song Chinese University of Hong Kong
Edward Lester
Edward Lester University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Engineering and Technology opens doors to various related fields, many of which now offer flexible online pathways. For those aiming for leadership roles, an online mba without gmat can be a practical route, allowing technical professionals to upskill in management without the hassle of standardized testing.

Project management is another essential skill set for engineers and technologists. An project management degree online accredited helps bridge the gap between technical expertise and team leadership—boosting career prospects across industries.

Engineering and technology students may also transition into fields like property development with an online real estate bachelor's degree. This path combines analytical skills with business acumen and offers strong potential earnings.

Finally, for those interested in design and user experiences, ui ux degree programs prepare graduates for rapidly growing digital sectors. These programs emphasize user-focused design, which is increasingly in demand as technology evolves.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan P. Mathews

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles