World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 60 3355 3088 19 17 322 10975

Edna Mozes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edna Mozes between 1963 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edna Mozes published across 60 years, from 1963 to 2022, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 1996. 1 of the 326 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 1996. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 2 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 2 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 5 publications 1972: 6 publications 1973: 9 publications 1974: 12 publications 1975: 11 publications 1976: 11 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 8 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 9 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1963 2022

326 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edna Mozes: publications per year, 1963 to 2022
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 2
1967 2
1968 1
1969 2
1970 3
1971 5
1972 6
1973 9
1974 12
1975 11
1976 11
1977 3
1978 8
1979 5
1980 7
1981 8
1982 7
1983 9
1984 5
1985 4
1986 9
1987 4
1988 6
1989 9
1990 9
1991 8
1992 4
1993 10
1994 12
1995 7
1996 15
1997 10
1998 4
1999 10
2000 12
2001 4
2002 3
2003 6
2004 4
2005 7
2006 9
2007 6
2008 8
2009 11
2010 6
2011 2
2012 0
2013 3
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 3
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 326
Download as CSV

Edna Mozes publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edna Mozes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 322–331 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 322 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97 322
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Edna Mozes D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edna Mozes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197 60
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Edna Mozes is affiliated with the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. Their research spans several interconnected areas within the biological sciences, emphasizing molecular and applied biological techniques.

The main fields of study include Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology as well as Medicine. Within these broader fields, their subfields of focus are Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, and Oncology. This multidisciplinary approach supports a range of investigations across genetic and cellular mechanisms, as well as applications in health and disease.

Edna Mozes has contributed to research on topics such as CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Transgenic Plants and Applications, and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers. These topics indicate a focus on genetic manipulation technologies, plant biotechnology, and immune-related cancer treatments.

Their recent publication record includes work published in notable scientific venues. One identified paper is titled Prof. Michael Sela (1924-2022), published in 2022 in the European Journal of Immunology. This paper contributes to the ongoing dialogue in immunological research.

  • Prof. Michael Sela (1924-2022), 2022, European Journal of Immunology

The European Journal of Immunology appears as a frequent venue for their published work. Collaboration has been a component of their research activities, with frequent co-authors including Ruth Arnon, Steffen Jung, and Israel Pecht. These collaborations reflect engagement with researchers active in related fields, facilitating interdisciplinary approaches.

  • Ruth Arnon
  • Steffen Jung
  • Israel Pecht

Best Publications

  • Induction of a systemic lupus erythematosus-like disease in mice by a common human anti-DNA idiotype

    Shlomo Mendlovic;Stefan Brocke;Yehuda Shoenfeld;Minna Ben-Bassat

  • Progressive immune dysfunction in cats experimentally infected with feline immunodeficiency virus.

    Michael Torten;Marco Franchini;Jeffrey E. Barlough;Jeanne W. George

  • Autoimmune manifestations in the transforming growth factor-beta 1 knockout mouse

    L Yaswen;AB Kulkarni;T Fredrickson;B Mittleman

  • Cellular sensitivity to collagen in thromboangiitis obliterans.

    Raphael Adar;Moshe Z. Papa;Zamir Halpern;Mark Mozes

  • Anti-cardiolipin antibodies induce pregnancy failure by impairing embryonic implantation

    Zev M. Sthoeger;Edna Mozes;Boris Tartakovsky

  • The effects of methotrexate on the production and activity of interleukin-1.

    Rafael Segal;Edna Mozes;Michael Yaron;Boris Tartakovsky

  • In vitro proliferative responses and antibody titers specific to human acetylcholine receptor synthetic peptides in patients with myasthenia gravis and relation to HLA class II genes.

    Stefan Brocke;Chaim Brautbar;Lawrence Steinman;Oded Abramsky

  • Antigen-specific thymus cell factors in the genetic control of the immune response to poly-(tyrosyl, glutamyl)-poly-D, L-alanyl--poly-lysyl.

    M. J. Taussig;Edna Mozes;Ronit Isac

  • Kinetics of cytokine production in experimental systemic lupus erythematosus: involvement of T helper cell 1/T helper cell 2-type cytokines in disease.

    Raphael Segal;Bonnie L. Bermas;Molly Dayan;Francis Kalush

  • Autoantibodies to a NR2A peptide of the glutamate/NMDA receptor in sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

    Eystein S Husebye;Zev M Sthoeger;Molly Dayan;Heidy Zinger

  • The genetic control of antibody specificity.

    Edna Mozes;Hugh O. McDevitt;Jean-Claude Jaton;Michael Sela

  • Dependence of the chemical nature of antibodies on the net electrical charge of antigens.

    Michael Sela;Edna Mozes

  • Beneficial effects of the anti-oestrogen tamoxifen on systemic lupus erythematosus of (NZBxNZW)F1 female mice are associated with specific reduction of IgG3 autoantibodies

    Z M Sthoeger;H Zinger;E Mozes

  • Modulation of murine systemic lupus erythematosus with peptides based on complementarity determining regions of a pathogenic anti-DNA monoclonal antibody

    Ari Waisman;Pedro J. Ruiz;Eran Israeli;Eran Eilat

  • Activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9 is elevated in sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

    A. Faber-Elmann;Z. Sthoeger;A. Tcherniack;M. Dayan

  • A peptide based on the complementarity-determining region 1 of an autoantibody ameliorates lupus by up-regulating CD4+CD25+ cells and TGF-β

    Amir Sharabi;Heidy Zinger;Maya Zborowsky;Zev M. Sthoeger

  • The role of anti-idiotypic antibodies in the induction of experimental systemic lupus erythematosus in mice.

    Shlomo Mendlovic;Harald Fricke;Yehuda Shoenfeld;Edna Mozes

  • The mechanism by which a peptide based on complementarity-determining region-1 of a pathogenic anti-DNA auto-Ab ameliorates experimental systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Eran Eilat;Molly Dayan;Heidy Zinger;Edna Mozes

  • Pathogenic idiotypes of autoantibodies in autoimmunity: lessons from new experimental models of SLE

    Yehuda Shoenfeld;Edna Mozes

  • Antigen specific T-cell helper factor cross reacts idiotypically with antibodies of the same specificity.

    Edna Mozes;Joseph Haimovich;Joseph Haimovich

  • Suppression of experimental systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in mice via TNF inhibition by an anti-TNFα monoclonal antibody and by pentoxiphylline

    R Segal;M Dayan;H Zinger;E Mozes

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Sela
Michael Sela Weizmann Institute of Science
Ari Waisman
Ari Waisman Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Yehuda Shoenfeld
Yehuda Shoenfeld Sheba Medical Center
Michal Schwartz
Michal Schwartz Weizmann Institute of Science
Rosalind A. Segal
Rosalind A. Segal Harvard University
Chaim Brautbar
Chaim Brautbar Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Gene M. Shearer
Gene M. Shearer National Institutes of Health
Sara Fuchs
Sara Fuchs Weizmann Institute of Science
Mati Fridkin
Mati Fridkin Weizmann Institute of Science
Miri Blank
Miri Blank Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Immunology in the USA, it’s valuable to explore related degrees that expand career opportunities. Many professionals in healthcare transition through various nursing roles, which can complement immunology expertise. For example, experienced nurses might explore accelerated nurse practitioner programs to fast-track their qualifications and broaden clinical skills.

Those interested in advancing to acute care may find acnp programs particularly relevant, offering specialized training that complements immunological knowledge critical in intensive care settings.

Additionally, individuals without a nursing background can pursue online accelerated nursing programs for non nurses to enter the healthcare field swiftly while building a solid foundation for immunology-related work.

Understanding potential earnings is also crucial for career planning. Aspiring or current nurse practitioners might want to review the dnp salary by state to assess financial prospects and make informed decisions about education investments.

Best Scientists Citing Edna Mozes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles