World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
20809
World Ranking
17240
National Ranking
8639

Stanley S. Siegelman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley S. Siegelman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 320 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stanley S. Siegelman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley S. Siegelman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanley S. Siegelman is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States, contributing to research primarily within the fields of Medicine, Immunology, and Microbiology. Their work includes a focus on subfields such as Physiology, Rheumatology, and Immunology.

The scientist's research spans several main topics, including:

  • Histiocytic Disorders and Treatments
  • Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
  • Mast cells and histamine

One of the recent papers authored by Siegelman was published in 2020. It is titled BRAF-Mutated Erdheim-Chester Disease: Profound Response to Vemurafenib Visualized With Serial Multimodality Imaging and appeared in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Stanley S. Siegelman include:

  • Javaughn Corey R. Gray
  • Jongho Kim
  • Michael Digianvittorio
  • Nancy Feeley
  • Paul J. Scheel

Their publications have appeared in venues such as the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, reflecting active engagement with specialized journals in their areas of study.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of Unsuspected Pancreatic Cysts on MDCT

    Thomas A. Laffan;Karen M. Horton;Alison P. Klein;Bruce Berlanstein

  • Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in acute leukemia: characteristic findings on CT, the CT halo sign, and the role of CT in early diagnosis.

    J E Kuhlman;E K Fishman;S S Siegelman

  • Solitary pulmonary nodules: CT assessment.

    S S Siegelman;N F Khouri;F P Leo;E K Fishman

  • Computed tomography of bronchiectasis.

    David P. Naidich;David P. Naidich;Dorothy I. McCauley;Dorothy I. McCauley;Nagi F. Khouri;Frederick P. Stitik

  • CT of the pulmonary nodule: a cooperative study.

    E A Zerhouni;F P Stitik;S S Siegelman;D P Naidich

  • Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation.

    David A. Bluemke;John L. Cameron;Ralph H. Hruban;Henry A. Pitt

  • Flexible transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of bronchogenic carcinoma.

    Ko Pen Wang;Roy Brower;Edward F. Haponik;Stanley Siegelman

  • Initial results from an agressive roentgenological and surgical approach to acute mesenteric ischemia.

    Scott J. Boley;Seymour Sprayregan;Stanley S. Siegelman;Frank J. Veith

  • CT of the solitary pulmonary nodule

    Stanley S Siegelman;E. A. Zerhouni;F. P. Leo;N. F. Khouri

  • CT of primary cystic pancreatic neoplasms: can CT be used for patient triage and treatment?

    Charlene A. Curry;John Eng;Karen M. Horton;Bruce Urban

  • Iodine 131 antiferritin, a new treatment modality in hepatoma: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study.

    S E Order;G B Stillwagon;J L Klein;P K Leichner

  • Pulmonary hamartoma: CT findings.

    Stanley S Siegelman;N. F. Khouri;William W Scott;F. P. Leo

  • Dural ectasia is a common feature of the Marfan syndrome.

    R E Pyeritz;E K Fishman;B A Bernhardt;S S Siegelman

  • CT of fluid collections associated with pancreatitis

    Stanley S Siegelman;B E Copeland;G P Saba;J L Cameron

  • The Solitary Pulmonary Nodule: Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management

    Nagi F. Khouri;Moulay A. Meziane;Elias A. Zerhouni;Elliot K. Fishman

  • Computed Tomography of the Pulmonary Parenchyma. Part 2: Interstitial Disease

    Elias A. Zerhouni;David P. Naidich;Frederick P. Stitik;Nagi F. Khouri

  • CT evaluation of Crohn's disease: effect on patient management.

    E. K. Fishman;Edward J. Wolf;Bronwyn Jones;T. M. Bayless

  • Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Acute Leukemia: The Contribution of CT to Early Diagnosis and Aggressive Management

    Janet E. Kuhlman;Elliot K. Fishman;Patrick A Burch;Judith E. Karp

  • Primary adrenocortical carcinoma: CT evaluation with clinical correlation

    EK Fishman;BM Deutch;DS Hartman;SM Goldman

  • Solid and papillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas.

    A C Friedman;J E Lichtenstein;E K Fishman;J E Oertel

Frequent Co-Authors

Elliot K. Fishman
Elliot K. Fishman Johns Hopkins University
David P. Naidich
David P. Naidich New York University
Ralph H. Hruban
Ralph H. Hruban Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
John L. Cameron
John L. Cameron Johns Hopkins University
Patrick C. Walsh
Patrick C. Walsh Johns Hopkins University
Elias A. Zerhouni
Elias A. Zerhouni The Zerhouni Group
Robert I. White
Robert I. White Yale University
David S. Ettinger
David S. Ettinger Johns Hopkins University
Barbara J. McNeil
Barbara J. McNeil Harvard University
David A. Bluemke
David A. Bluemke University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine extends beyond just becoming a doctor. Numerous online degrees open doors to essential roles in healthcare. For those interested in management, healthcare administration offers rewarding pathways. With growing demand, prospective students can now enroll in cheapest mha programs online to gain valuable leadership skills without the heavy financial burden.

If affordability remains a top priority, there are also several options for affordable mha online degrees. These programs are flexible and suitable for busy professionals looking to advance their careers.

Beyond administration, clinical leadership can be pursued through top-tier nursing qualifications. The best online dnp programs enable nurses to reach the highest level of practice and influence healthcare outcomes on a larger scale.

Aspiring pharmacists can benefit from flexible and reputable online pharmacy programs, preparing for essential roles in community, industry, and clinical settings.

Choosing the right online degree can help you build a dynamic and rewarding healthcare career while managing costs and study commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley S. Siegelman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles