World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 137 1905 1776 70 66 591 72516

Nestor L. Müller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nestor L. Müller between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nestor L. Müller published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 14.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 105 publications in 2010. 31 of the 639 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 105. Peak 105 publications in 2010. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 16 publications 1989: 15 publications 1990: 16 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 14 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 18 publications 1995: 23 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 22 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 29 publications 2006: 47 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 44 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 105 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 26 publications
1981 2025

639 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nestor L. Müller: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 5
1986 11
1987 8
1988 16
1989 15
1990 16
1991 14
1992 14
1993 18
1994 18
1995 23
1996 14
1997 17
1998 14
1999 20
2000 22
2001 10
2002 14
2003 26
2004 23
2005 29
2006 47
2007 17
2008 44
2009 5
2010 105
2011 6
2012 4
2013 2
2014 3
2015 8
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 2
2020 2
2021 4
2022 2
2023 4
2024 5
2025 26
Total 639
Download as CSV

Nestor L. Müller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nestor L. Müller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 591 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 591
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Nestor L. Müller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nestor L. Müller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 136–137 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 137 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159 137
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Nestor L. Müller is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a specialization in pulmonary and respiratory medicine. The scientist has contributed to a significant number of publications, with a total of 63 in the field of medicine and 32 specifically in pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Additional subfields of study include radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, physiology, surgery, and critical care and intensive care medicine.

The scientist's work covers various topics, with major areas of focus being:

  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
  • Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Occupational and environmental lung diseases
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Müller has published extensively in several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • CHEST Journal
  • Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
  • Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Journal of Medical and Biosciences Research.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Müller include:

  • "Algorithmic Approach to the Diagnosis of Organizing Pneumonia," 2022, CHEST Journal
  • "Integration and Application of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis," 2022, CHEST Journal
  • "RSNA Expert Consensus Statement on Reporting Chest CT Findings Related to COVID-19: Interobserver Agreement Between Chest Radiologists," 2020, Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
  • "Chest CT target sign in a couple with COVID-19 pneumonia," 2020, Radiologia Brasileira
  • "The Role of Emergency Radiology in COVID-19: From Preparedness to Diagnosis," 2020, Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal

Nestor L. Müller has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Andrew Churg
  • Kerri A. Johannson
  • Christopher J. Ryerson
  • Ana-Maria Bilawich
  • John R. Mayo

Best Publications

  • An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management

    Ganesh Raghu;Harold R. Collard;Jim J. Egan;Fernando J. Martinez

  • American thoracic society/European respiratory society international multidisciplinary consensus classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

    William D. Travis;Talmadge E. King;Eric D. Bateman;David A. Lynch

  • Fleischner Society: Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging

    David M Hansell;Alexander A Bankier;Heber MacMahon;Theresa C McLoud

  • Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study.

    Stephen J. Swensen;Robert W. Viggiano;David E. Midthun;Nestor L. Müller

  • “Density Mask”: An Objective Method to Quantitate Emphysema Using Computed Tomography

    Nestor L. Müller;Catherine A. Staples;Roberta R. Miller;Raja T. Abboud

  • Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society.

    J. H. M. Austin;N. L. Müller;P. J. Friedman;D. M. Hansell

  • High-Resolution CT of the Lung

    W. Richard Webb;Nestor Luiz Müller;David P. Naidich

  • Clinical diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

    Yves Lacasse;Moises Selman;Ulrich Costabel;Jean Charles Dalphin

  • Utility of a Lung Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

    Gary W. Hunninghake;M. Bridget Zimmerman;David A. Schwartz;Talmadge E. King

  • Solitary pulmonary nodule: high-resolution CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation.

    Charles V. Zwirewich;Sverre Vedal;Roberta R. Miller;Nestor L. Müller

  • Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: Report of an American thoracic society project

    William D. Travis;Gary Hunninghake;Talmadge E. King;David A. Lynch

  • CT in differential diagnosis of diffuse pleural disease.

    A N Leung;N L Müller;R R Miller

  • Spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis: histologic, clinical, and radiologic findings.

    Tomás Franquet;Nestor L. Müller;Ana Giménez;Pedro Guembe

  • Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy.

    J R Mayo;M Remy-Jardin;N L Müller;J Remy

  • Chronic diffuse infiltrative lung disease: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of CT and chest radiography.

    J R Mathieson;J R Mayo;C A Staples;N L Müller

  • Radiation Exposure at Chest CT: A Statement of the Fleischner Society

    John R. Mayo;John Aldrich;Nestor L. Müller

  • The diagnosis of emphysema. A computed tomographic-pathologic correlation.

    C Bergin;N Müller;D M Nichols;G Lillington

  • Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: differentiation from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia by using thin-section CT.

    C. Isabela S. Silva;Nestor L. Müller;David A. Lynch;Douglas Curran-Everett

  • Quantitation of emphysema by computed tomography using a "density mask" program and correlation with pulmonary function tests.

    Mario Kinsella;Nestor L. Müller;Raja T. Abboud;Nancy J. Morrison;Nancy J. Morrison

  • High-Resolution CT of the Lung

    W. Richard Webb;Nestor L. Muller;David P. Naidich;Moulay A. Meziane

Frequent Co-Authors

Takeshi Johkoh
Takeshi Johkoh Osaka University
Peter D. Paré
Peter D. Paré University of British Columbia
Hironobu Nakamura
Hironobu Nakamura Osaka University
David M. Hansell
David M. Hansell National Institutes of Health
Andrew Churg
Andrew Churg University of British Columbia
Harvey O. Coxson
Harvey O. Coxson University of British Columbia
David A. Lynch
David A. Lynch Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Thomas V. Colby
Thomas V. Colby Mayo Clinic
James C. Hogg
James C. Hogg University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine often opens doors to related pathways and advanced online degrees. Many students and professionals consider degrees that complement a medical background or support healthcare leadership ambitions. For those interested in hospital management or healthcare administration, cahme accredited online mha programs offer flexible learning options while ensuring industry-recognized accreditation.

Registered nurses looking to advance their credentials without the requirement of onsite clinical hours often prefer online rn to bsn programs no clinicals. These programs make it easier for busy professionals to earn their BSN while balancing work.

For those aiming for leadership or specialized roles in nursing, pursuing a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) can be a logical next step. Prospective students seeking efficiency may be interested in the fastest dnp online program options. Others might choose pathways that are more accessible but still rigorous, such as various dnp online programs tailored for working nurses.

Exploring these online degrees enables medical students and healthcare professionals to find flexible, career-focused advancement opportunities tailored to evolving industry needs.

Best Scientists Citing Nestor L. Müller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles