World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
31835
World Ranking
10500
National Ranking
5404

Lee M. Jampol publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee M. Jampol sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 564 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lee M. Jampol D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee M. Jampol sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lee M. Jampol is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a specialized emphasis in ophthalmology. The scientific contributions cover various subfields including radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, molecular biology, neurology, and physiology.

The main topics addressed in their work involve retinal diseases and treatments, retinal imaging and analysis, retinal and optic conditions, ocular diseases including Behçet's syndrome, glaucoma and retinal disorders, retinal and macular surgery, as well as ocular oncology and treatments.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Lee M. Jampol include Jennifer K. Sun, Adam R. Glassman, Daniel Martín, Maureen G. Maguire, and Cynthia R. Stockdale.

The scientist's publications often appear in various specialized journals, with frequent publication venues comprising:

  • JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Retina
  • Ophthalmology
  • Retinal Cases & Brief Reports
  • Ophthalmology Retina

Selected recent papers by Lee M. Jampol include:

  • Evaluation and Care of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Five-Year Outcomes after Initial Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema (Protocol T Extension Study), 2020, Ophthalmology
  • Application of Automated Quantification of Fluid Volumes to Anti-VEGF Therapy of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, 2020, Ophthalmology
  • Effect of Intravitreous Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor vs Sham Treatment for Prevention of Vision-Threatening Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy, 2021, JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Effect of Intravitreous Aflibercept vs Vitrectomy With Panretinal Photocoagulation on Visual Acuity in Patients With Vitreous Hemorrhage From Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, 2020, JAMA

Best Publications

  • Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema.

    John A Wells;Adam R Glassman;Allison R Ayala

  • Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial.

    John A. Wells;Adam R. Glassman;Allison R. Ayala;Lee M. Jampol

  • Development of metastatic disease after enrollment in the COMS trials for treatment of choroidal melanoma: Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group Report No. 26.

    Marie Diener-West;Sandra M Reynolds;Donna J Agugliaro;Robert Caldwell

  • Panretinal Photocoagulation vs Intravitreous Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Jeffrey G. Gross;Adam R. Glassman;Lee M. Jampol;Seidu Inusah

  • Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema with Prompt versus Deferred Laser Treatment: 5-Year Randomized Trial Results

    Michael J. Elman;Allison Ayala;Neil M. Bressler;David Browning

  • Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia with verteporfin - 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial - VIP report no. 1

    J. Arnold;D. Kilmartin;J. Olson;S. Neville

  • Pathophysiology of hypertensive retinopathy.

    Mark O.M. Tso;Lee M. Jampol

  • Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome: I. Clinical Findings

    Lee Merrill Jampol;Paul A. Sieving;David Pugh;Gerald A. Fishman

  • The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma: IV. Local treatment failure and enucleation in the first 5 years after brachytherapy. COMS report no. 19

    Lee M. Jampol;Claudia S. Moy;Claudia S. Moy;Timothy G. Murray;Sandra M. Reynolds

  • Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Ophthalmology

    Stephen J. Kim;Allan J. Flach;Lee M. Jampol

  • Prolonged effect of intensive therapy on the risk of retinopathy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: 10 years after the diabetes control and complications trial

    Neil H. White;Wanjie Sun;Patricia A. Cleary;Ronald P. Danis

  • Five-Year Outcomes of Panretinal Photocoagulation vs Intravitreous Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Jeffrey G. Gross;Adam R. Glassman;Danni Liu;Jennifer K. Sun;Jennifer K. Sun

  • Quantifying Microvascular Abnormalities With Increasing Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

    Peter L. Nesper;Philipp K. Roberts;Philipp K. Roberts;Alex C. Onishi;Haitao Chai;Haitao Chai

  • Persistent Macular Thickening Following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Neil M. Bressler;Wesley T. Beaulieu;Adam R. Glassman;Kevin J. Blinder

  • Acetazolamide for treatment of chronic macular edema in retinitis pigmentosa.

    Gerald A. Fishman;Leonardo D. Gilbert;Richard G. Fiscella;Alan E. Kimura

  • Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Vision Loss Among Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Involving the Center of the Macula and Good Visual Acuity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Carl W. Baker;Adam R. Glassman;Wesley T. Beaulieu;Andrew N. Antoszyk

  • Effect of Adding Dexamethasone to Continued Ranibizumab Treatment in Patients With Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema: A DRCR Network Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Raj K Maturi;Adam R Glassman;Danni Liu;Roy W Beck

  • White spot syndromes of the retina: a hypothesis based on the common genetic hypothesis of autoimmune/inflammatory disease

    Lee Merrill Jampol;Kevin G. Becker

  • The Expanded Spectrum of Focal Choroidal Excavation

    Ron Margolis;Sri Krishna Mukkamala;Lee M. Jampol;Richard F. Spaide

  • Treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with photodynamic therapy.

    Richard F. Spaide;Irene Donsoff;Deborah L. Lam;Lawrence A. Yannuzzi

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil M. Bressler
Neil M. Bressler Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Lawrence A. Yannuzzi
Lawrence A. Yannuzzi Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital
Susan B. Bressler
Susan B. Bressler Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Frederick L. Ferris
Frederick L. Ferris National Institutes of Health
Edwin M. Stone
Edwin M. Stone University of Iowa
K. Bailey Freund
K. Bailey Freund New York University
Lloyd Paul Aiello
Lloyd Paul Aiello Harvard University
Maureen G. Maguire
Maureen G. Maguire University of Pennsylvania
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Medical University of Vienna
Richard F. Spaide
Richard F. Spaide Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career alternatives in healthcare? Online study options offer adaptable pathways, whether you're just starting out or seeking career advancement. Nurses, for example, can fast-track their qualifications through programs like the cheapest rn to bsn program online, designed for working RNs to earn a bachelor’s degree efficiently and affordably.

If you hold a bachelor’s in another field, direct entry online msn programs make it possible to pursue a master’s in nursing even without prior nursing experience. These flexible options help address industry demand for highly skilled professionals.

To minimize costs while reaching the highest academic level in nursing, many seek the online phd in nursing. This can prepare you for leadership, research, and faculty positions from anywhere.

For those looking for accessible entry points, learn more about whats the easiest nursing program to get into? to help you gain admission and get started on a rewarding career in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Lee M. Jampol

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles