World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
44951
World Ranking
6483
National Ranking
3447

Jay S. Duker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay S. Duker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 682 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jay S. Duker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay S. Duker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay S. Duker is affiliated with Tufts Medical Center in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of medicine, with particular specialization in ophthalmology. Their scholarly output comprises 118 publications, with major contributions in subfields including ophthalmology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and molecular biology.

Their main research themes encompass retinal diseases and treatments, retinal imaging and analysis, glaucoma and retinal disorders, retinal and optic conditions, ocular oncology and treatments, optical coherence tomography applications, and retinal and macular surgery.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Nadia K. Waheed
  • Caroline R. Baumal
  • André J. Witkin
  • A. Yasin Alibhai
  • Nihaal Mehta

Jay S. Duker has published extensively in multiple journals, with notable recurring venues such as:

  • International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • Retina
  • Ophthalmology Retina
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports

Some recent representative papers include:

  • A practical guide to optical coherence tomography angiography interpretation, 2020, International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
  • Surgical classification for large macular hole: based on different surgical techniques results: the CLOSE study group, 2023, International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
  • Repeatability of binarization thresholding methods for optical coherence tomography angiography image quantification, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • 15-Gene Expression Profile and PRAME as Integrated Prognostic Test for Uveal Melanoma: First Report of Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study No. 2 (COOG2.1), 2024, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Model-to-Data Approach for Deep Learning in Optical Coherence Tomography Intraretinal Fluid Segmentation, 2020, JAMA Ophthalmology

Best Publications

  • Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography.

    Carmen A. Puliafito;Michael R. Hee;Charles P. Lin;Elias Reichel

  • Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation.

    Maciej Wojtkowski;Vivek J. Srinivasan;Tony H. Ko;James G. Fujimoto

  • Intravitreal triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema.

    Adam Martidis;Jay S Duker;Paul B Greenberg;Adam H Rogers

  • Quantitative Assessment of Macular Edema with Optical Coherence Tomography

    M. R. Hee;C. A. Puliafito;C. Wong;J. S. Duker

  • The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole.

    Jay S. Duker;Peter K. Kaiser;Susanne Binder;Marc D. de Smet

  • A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

    Talisa E de Carlo;Talisa E de Carlo;Andre Romano;Nadia K Waheed;Jay S Duker

  • Topography of Diabetic Macular Edema with Optical Coherence Tomography

    Michael R. Hee;Carmen A. Puliafito;Jay S. Duker;Elias Reichel

  • Three-dimensional retinal imaging with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography.

    Maciej Wojtkowski;Maciej Wojtkowski;Vivek Srinivasan;James G. Fujimoto;Tony Ko

  • Optical coherence tomography of macular holes.

    Michael R. Hee;Carmen A. Puliafito;Carlton Wong;Jay S. Duker

  • Choroidal Thickness in Normal Eyes Measured Using Cirrus HD Optical Coherence Tomography

    Varsha Manjunath;Mohammad Taha;James G. Fujimoto;Jay S. Duker

  • Optical coherence tomography – current and future applications

    Mehreen Adhi;Jay S. Duker

  • Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography

    Michael S. Ip;Brad J. Baker;Jay S. Duker;Elias Reichel

  • Optical Coherence Tomography of Age-related Macular Degeneration and Choroidal Neovascularization

    Michael R. Hee;Caroline R. Baumal;Carmen A. Puliafito;Jay S. Duker

  • Normal Macular Thickness Measurements in Healthy Eyes Using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography

    Annie Chan;Jay S. Duker;Tony H. Ko;James G. Fujimoto

  • Transpupillary thermotherapy of occult subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in patients with age-related macular degeneration

    Elias Reichel;Audina M Berrocal;Michael Ip;Arnold J Kroll

  • Characterization of Epiretinal Membranes Using Optical Coherence Tomography

    Jason R. Wilkins;Carmen A. Puliafito;Michael R. Hee;Jay S. Duker

  • Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion

    Paul B Greenberg;Adam Martidis;Adam H Rogers;Jay S Duker

  • A Pilot Study of Multiple Intravitreal Injections of Ranibizumab in Patients with Center-Involving Clinically Significant Diabetic Macular Edema

    Dal W. Chun;Jeffrey S. Heier;Trexler M. Topping;Jay S. Duker

  • Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Choroidal Neovascularization

    Talisa E. de Carlo;Talisa E. de Carlo;Marco A. Bonini Filho;Marco A. Bonini Filho;Adam T. Chin;Mehreen Adhi;Mehreen Adhi

  • Optical Coherence Tomography of age-related macular degeneration and choroidal neovascularization

    C. A. Puliafito;M. R. Hee;C. R. Baumal;J. S. Duker

Frequent Co-Authors

Joel S. Schuman
Joel S. Schuman Wills Eye Hospital
Hiroshi Ishikawa
Hiroshi Ishikawa Oregon Health & Science University
Joachim Hornegger
Joachim Hornegger University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Carmen A. Puliafito
Carmen A. Puliafito University of Southern California
Andreas Maier
Andreas Maier University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Philip J. Rosenfeld
Philip J. Rosenfeld University of Miami
David Huang
David Huang Oregon Health & Science University
Johanna M. Seddon
Johanna M. Seddon University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
K. Bailey Freund
K. Bailey Freund New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, a range of related online degrees and career pathways can complement or kickstart your healthcare journey. Many aspiring healthcare professionals start with online medical coding classes with financial aid, which offer a flexible entry point into medical settings without requiring years of advanced education.

For those interested in nursing, it’s important to note that do all nursing schools require the teas is a common question. Some schools provide pathways that don’t require TEAS or HESI exams, making nursing education more accessible.

If your ambitions are set on management or leadership within healthcare, healthcare administration degrees can be completed online, often at an accelerated pace, allowing you to advance your career while balancing other commitments.

Registered nurses looking to expand their scope of practice might consider rn to fnp programs, which create a bridge from ADN to MSN and open doors to advanced clinical roles, such as Family Nurse Practitioner.

Best Scientists Citing Jay S. Duker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles