World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 65 2422 2346 102 99 612 21258

Joachim Hornegger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joachim Hornegger between 1994 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joachim Hornegger published across 31 years, from 1994 to 2024, averaging 22.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 84 publications in 2013. 4 of the 692 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 84. Peak 84 publications in 2013. 1994: 3 publications 1995: 18 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 11 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 43 publications 2008: 35 publications 2009: 44 publications 2010: 49 publications 2011: 80 publications 2012: 66 publications 2013: 84 publications 2014: 69 publications 2015: 60 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication
1994 2024

692 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joachim Hornegger: publications per year, 1994 to 2024
Year Publications
1994 3
1995 18
1996 1
1997 11
1998 2
1999 3
2000 4
2001 3
2002 1
2003 3
2004 8
2005 13
2006 26
2007 43
2008 35
2009 44
2010 49
2011 80
2012 66
2013 84
2014 69
2015 60
2016 33
2017 14
2018 12
2019 2
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 3
2024 1
Total 692
Download as CSV

Joachim Hornegger publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Hornegger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 612–621 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 612 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28 612
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Joachim Hornegger D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Hornegger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292 65
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Joachim Hornegger is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with specific focus areas within General Health Professions and Health Informatics.

Their main topics of work include healthcare cost, quality, and practices; artificial intelligence applications in healthcare and education; and challenges within healthcare systems. These focal points suggest an interdisciplinary approach combining medical knowledge with technological innovations.

  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Healthcare Systems and Challenges

  • Health Professions (2 publications)
  • Medicine (1 publication)

  • General Health Professions (2 publications)
  • Health Informatics (1 publication)

Although no recent papers or frequent co-authors are listed, the scholar's contributions have concentrated on these established fields and topics. There is also no record of book publications or awards, which indicates that their research profile centers on peer-reviewed outputs and ongoing scientific discourse rather than monographs or formally recognized distinctions.

This profile reflects a scholarly trajectory integrated within the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, emphasizing the intersection of health profession expertise and the advancement of artificial intelligence methodologies to address practical and systemic issues in healthcare delivery and education.

Best Publications

  • Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography

    Yali Jia;Ou Tan;Jason Tokayer;Benjamin Potsaid

  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -- MICCAI 2015

    Nassir Navab;Joachim Hornegger;William M. Wells;Alejandro F. Frangi

  • Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets

    T. Heimann;B. van Ginneken;M.A. Styner;Y. Arzhaeva

  • Robust Vessel Segmentation in Fundus Images

    Attila Budai;Rüdiger Bock;Andreas K. Maier;Joachim Hornegger

  • Retinal vessel segmentation by improved matched filtering: evaluation on a new high-resolution fundus image database

    Jan Odstrcilik;Radim Kolar;Attila Budai;Joachim Hornegger

  • Glaucoma risk index: Automated glaucoma detection from color fundus images

    Rüdiger Bock;Jörg Meier;László G. Nyúl;Joachim Hornegger

  • Motion correction in optical coherence tomography volumes on a per A-scan basis using orthogonal scan patterns

    Martin F. Kraus;Benjamin Potsaid;Markus A. Mayer;Ruediger Bock

  • Multi-Scale Deep Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time 3D-Landmark Detection in CT Scans

    Florin-Cristian Ghesu;Bogdan Georgescu;Yefeng Zheng;Sasa Grbic

  • Deconvolution-based CT and MR brain perfusion measurement: theoretical model revisited and practical implementation details

    Andreas Fieselmann;Markus Kowarschik;Arundhuti Ganguly;Joachim Hornegger

  • Absolute quantification in SPECT

    Philipp Ritt;Hans Vija;Joachim Hornegger;Torsten Kuwert

  • Fast GPU-Based CT Reconstruction using the Common Unified Device Architecture (CUDA)

    H. Scherl;B. Keck;M. Kowarschik;J. Hornegger

  • Wavelet Based Noise Reduction in CT-Images Using Correlation Analysis

    A. Borsdorf;R. Raupach;T. Flohr;J. Hornegger

  • Wavelet denoising of multiframe optical coherence tomography data.

    Markus A. Mayer;Anja Borsdorf;Martin Wagner;Joachim Hornegger

  • Automatic no-reference quality assessment for retinal fundus images using vessel segmentation

    Thomas Kohler;Attila Budai;Martin F. Kraus;Jan Odstrcilik

  • Gesture recognition with a Time-Of-Flight camera

    Eva Kollorz;Jochen Penne;Joachim Hornegger;Alexander Barke

  • Tetrahedral vs. polyhedral mesh size evaluation on flow velocity and wall shear stress for cerebral hemodynamic simulation.

    Martin Spiegel;Thomas Redel;Y Jonathan Zhang;Tobias Struffert

  • An Artificial Agent for Anatomical Landmark Detection in Medical Images

    Florin C. Ghesu;Bogdan Georgescu;Tommaso Mansi;Dominik Neumann

  • Quantitative 3D-OCT motion correction with tilt and illumination correction, robust similarity measure and regularization

    Martin F. Kraus;Jonathan J. Liu;Julia Schottenhamml;Chieh Li Chen

  • Biometric and mobile gait analysis for early diagnosis and therapy monitoring in Parkinson's disease

    Jens Barth;Jochen Klucken;Patrick Kugler;Thomas Kammerer

  • Marginal Space Deep Learning: Efficient Architecture for Volumetric Image Parsing

    Florin C. Ghesu;Edward Krubasik;Bogdan Georgescu;Vivek Singh

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Maier
Andreas Maier University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Rebecca Fahrig
Rebecca Fahrig Siemens Healthcare (United States)
Jay S. Duker
Jay S. Duker Tufts Medical Center
Dorin Comaniciu
Dorin Comaniciu Siemens (United States)
Bogdan Georgescu
Bogdan Georgescu Princeton University
Lena Maier-Hein
Lena Maier-Hein German Cancer Research Center
David Huang
David Huang Oregon Health & Science University
Yefeng Zheng
Yefeng Zheng Tencent (China)
Stefan Steidl
Stefan Steidl MorphoSys (Germany)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens up diverse academic and career opportunities. For those just starting, pursuing an associates degrees program can offer a quick route to foundational skills and entry-level tech positions. These programs are generally more accessible and can help you build up to higher degrees.

If cost is a concern, enrolling in a cheapest online masters degree program may make postgraduate qualifications in fields like data science or software engineering more attainable. Affordability can significantly impact your return on investment and career flexibility.

Career advancement often calls for leadership skills, especially in tech management or education sectors. Consider earning an ed.d educational leadership if you’re interested in education-focused leadership roles. For broader management ambitions, an online doctorate leadership program can help prepare you for high-level organizational positions.

Whether you start with an associate’s or aim for a doctorate, online degrees offer flexibility and affordability for those working towards a career in computer science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Hornegger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles