World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
65
Citations
21258
World Ranking
2422
National Ranking
102

Joachim Hornegger publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Hornegger sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 612 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joachim Hornegger D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Hornegger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Joachim Hornegger is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with specific focus areas within General Health Professions and Health Informatics.

Their main topics of work include healthcare cost, quality, and practices; artificial intelligence applications in healthcare and education; and challenges within healthcare systems. These focal points suggest an interdisciplinary approach combining medical knowledge with technological innovations.

  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Healthcare Systems and Challenges

  • Health Professions (2 publications)
  • Medicine (1 publication)

  • General Health Professions (2 publications)
  • Health Informatics (1 publication)

Although no recent papers or frequent co-authors are listed, the scholar's contributions have concentrated on these established fields and topics. There is also no record of book publications or awards, which indicates that their research profile centers on peer-reviewed outputs and ongoing scientific discourse rather than monographs or formally recognized distinctions.

This profile reflects a scholarly trajectory integrated within the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, emphasizing the intersection of health profession expertise and the advancement of artificial intelligence methodologies to address practical and systemic issues in healthcare delivery and education.

Best Publications

  • Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography

    Yali Jia;Ou Tan;Jason Tokayer;Benjamin Potsaid

  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -- MICCAI 2015

    Nassir Navab;Joachim Hornegger;William M. Wells;Alejandro F. Frangi

  • Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets

    T. Heimann;B. van Ginneken;M.A. Styner;Y. Arzhaeva

  • Robust Vessel Segmentation in Fundus Images

    Attila Budai;Rüdiger Bock;Andreas K. Maier;Joachim Hornegger

  • Retinal vessel segmentation by improved matched filtering: evaluation on a new high-resolution fundus image database

    Jan Odstrcilik;Radim Kolar;Attila Budai;Joachim Hornegger

  • Glaucoma risk index: Automated glaucoma detection from color fundus images

    Rüdiger Bock;Jörg Meier;László G. Nyúl;Joachim Hornegger

  • Motion correction in optical coherence tomography volumes on a per A-scan basis using orthogonal scan patterns

    Martin F. Kraus;Benjamin Potsaid;Markus A. Mayer;Ruediger Bock

  • Multi-Scale Deep Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time 3D-Landmark Detection in CT Scans

    Florin-Cristian Ghesu;Bogdan Georgescu;Yefeng Zheng;Sasa Grbic

  • Deconvolution-based CT and MR brain perfusion measurement: theoretical model revisited and practical implementation details

    Andreas Fieselmann;Markus Kowarschik;Arundhuti Ganguly;Joachim Hornegger

  • Absolute quantification in SPECT

    Philipp Ritt;Hans Vija;Joachim Hornegger;Torsten Kuwert

  • Fast GPU-Based CT Reconstruction using the Common Unified Device Architecture (CUDA)

    H. Scherl;B. Keck;M. Kowarschik;J. Hornegger

  • Wavelet Based Noise Reduction in CT-Images Using Correlation Analysis

    A. Borsdorf;R. Raupach;T. Flohr;J. Hornegger

  • Wavelet denoising of multiframe optical coherence tomography data.

    Markus A. Mayer;Anja Borsdorf;Martin Wagner;Joachim Hornegger

  • Automatic no-reference quality assessment for retinal fundus images using vessel segmentation

    Thomas Kohler;Attila Budai;Martin F. Kraus;Jan Odstrcilik

  • Gesture recognition with a Time-Of-Flight camera

    Eva Kollorz;Jochen Penne;Joachim Hornegger;Alexander Barke

  • Tetrahedral vs. polyhedral mesh size evaluation on flow velocity and wall shear stress for cerebral hemodynamic simulation.

    Martin Spiegel;Thomas Redel;Y Jonathan Zhang;Tobias Struffert

  • An Artificial Agent for Anatomical Landmark Detection in Medical Images

    Florin C. Ghesu;Bogdan Georgescu;Tommaso Mansi;Dominik Neumann

  • Quantitative 3D-OCT motion correction with tilt and illumination correction, robust similarity measure and regularization

    Martin F. Kraus;Jonathan J. Liu;Julia Schottenhamml;Chieh Li Chen

  • Biometric and mobile gait analysis for early diagnosis and therapy monitoring in Parkinson's disease

    Jens Barth;Jochen Klucken;Patrick Kugler;Thomas Kammerer

  • Marginal Space Deep Learning: Efficient Architecture for Volumetric Image Parsing

    Florin C. Ghesu;Edward Krubasik;Bogdan Georgescu;Vivek Singh

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Maier
Andreas Maier University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Rebecca Fahrig
Rebecca Fahrig Siemens Healthcare (United States)
Jay S. Duker
Jay S. Duker Tufts Medical Center
Dorin Comaniciu
Dorin Comaniciu Siemens (United States)
Bogdan Georgescu
Bogdan Georgescu Princeton University
Lena Maier-Hein
Lena Maier-Hein German Cancer Research Center
David Huang
David Huang Oregon Health & Science University
Yefeng Zheng
Yefeng Zheng Tencent (China)
Stefan Steidl
Stefan Steidl MorphoSys (Germany)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens up diverse academic and career opportunities. For those just starting, pursuing an associates degrees program can offer a quick route to foundational skills and entry-level tech positions. These programs are generally more accessible and can help you build up to higher degrees.

If cost is a concern, enrolling in a cheapest online masters degree program may make postgraduate qualifications in fields like data science or software engineering more attainable. Affordability can significantly impact your return on investment and career flexibility.

Career advancement often calls for leadership skills, especially in tech management or education sectors. Consider earning an ed.d educational leadership if you’re interested in education-focused leadership roles. For broader management ambitions, an online doctorate leadership program can help prepare you for high-level organizational positions.

Whether you start with an associate’s or aim for a doctorate, online degrees offer flexibility and affordability for those working towards a career in computer science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Hornegger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles