World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
8943
World Ranking
11020
National Ranking
549

Stefan Steidl publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Steidl sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 113 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stefan Steidl D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Steidl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Steidl is affiliated with MorphoSys in Germany, contributing extensively to medical research with a focus on immunology and oncology. Their body of work includes 18 publications in medicine and 11 in immunology and microbiology, reflecting a significant engagement with these scientific disciplines.

The primary subfields of Stefan Steidl's research encompass immunology, oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pathology and forensic medicine, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The main research topics covered by their work include:

  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research
  • Lymphoma diagnosis and treatment
  • Phagocytosis and immune regulation
  • Immunotherapy and immune responses
  • Renal diseases and glomerulopathies
  • Immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders

Stefan Steidl has authored multiple papers on topics related to lymphoma, antibody therapies, and immune checkpoint modulation. Recent publications feature research on tafasitamab, a monoclonal antibody, and its efficacy in treating aggressive lymphoma subtypes, as well as its interaction with other therapeutic agents and immune checkpoints. Significant papers include:

  • Activity of tafasitamab in combination with rituximab in subtypes of aggressive lymphoma, 2023, published in Frontiers in Immunology
  • The Impact of Prior Treatment with a CD19 Targeting Monoclonal Antibody on Subsequent Treatment with CD19 Targeting CART Cell Therapy in Preclinical Models, 2021, Blood
  • Blockade of the CD47/SIRPα Checkpoint Potentiates the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Tafasitamab, 2020, Blood
  • The Sumoylation Inhibitor TAK-981 in Combination with the CD19-Targeting Antibody Tafasitamab Shows Enhanced Anti-Tumor Activity in Preclinical B-Cell Lymphoma Models, 2021, Blood
  • Blocking the CD47-Sirpa Axis Enhances Tafasitamab-Mediated Phagocytosis, 2022, Blood

The publication venues most frequently featuring Stefan Steidl's work include:

  • Blood
  • Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • International Journal of Toxicology

Stefan Steidl's frequent co-authors consist of Christina Heitmüller, Maria Patra-Kneuer, Christian Augsberger, Karin Landgraf, and Kristina M. Ilieva, indicating collaborative work especially in immunology and oncology research settings.

Best Publications

  • The INTERSPEECH 2009 Emotion Challenge

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner

  • Recognising realistic emotions and affect in speech: State of the art and lessons learnt from the first challenge

    Björn Schuller;Anton Batliner;Stefan Steidl;Dino Seppi

  • The INTERSPEECH 2013 computational paralinguistics challenge: social signals, conflict, emotion, autism

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Alessandro Vinciarelli

  • The INTERSPEECH 2010 Paralinguistic Challenge

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Felix Burkhardt

  • Paralinguistics in speech and language-State-of-the-art and the challenge

    BjöRn Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Felix Burkhardt

  • The INTERSPEECH 2016 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Deception, Sincerity & Native Language

    Björn W. Schuller;Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Anton Batliner;Julia Hirschberg

  • The INTERSPEECH 2012 Speaker Trait Challenge

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Elmar Nöth

  • The INTERSPEECH 2011 Speaker State Challenge

    Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Florian Schiel;Jarek Krajewski

  • The relevance of feature type for the automatic classification of emotional user states: low level descriptors and functionals.

    Björn W. Schuller;Anton Batliner;Dino Seppi;Stefan Steidl

  • “You Stupid Tin Box” - Children Interacting with the AIBO Robot: A Cross-linguistic Emotional Speech Corpus

    Anton Batliner;Christian Hacker;Stefan Steidl;Elmar Nöth

  • The PF STAR Children's Speech Corpus

    Anton Batliner;Mats Blomberg;Shona D'Arcy;Daniel Elenius

  • Whodunnit - Searching for the most important feature types signalling emotion-related user states in speech

    Anton Batliner;Stefan Steidl;Björn Schuller;Dino Seppi

  • The INTERSPEECH 2014 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Cognitive & Physical Load

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Julien Epps

  • Combining Efforts for Improving Automatic Classification of Emotional User States

    A. Batliner;S. Steidl;B. Schuller;D. Seppi

  • Towards More Reality in the Recognition of Emotional Speech

    B. Schuller;D. Seppi;A. Batliner;A. Maier

  • The INTERSPEECH 2015 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Nativeness, Parkinson's & Eating Condition

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Simone Hantke

  • The INTERSPEECH 2017 computational paralinguistics challenge: Addressee, cold & snoring

    Björn Schuller;Björn Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Anton Batliner;Elika Bergelson

  • An Image-based Deep Spectrum Feature Representation for the Recognition of Emotional Speech

    Nicholas Cummins;Shahin Amiriparian;Gerhard Hagerer;Anton Batliner

  • "Of all things the measure is man" automatic classification of emotions and inter-labeler consistency [speech-based emotion recognition]

    S. Steidl;M. Levit;A. Batliner;E. Noth

  • The INTERSPEECH 2018 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Atypical & Self-Assessed Affect, Crying & Heart Beats.

    Bjorn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Peter B. Marschik

Frequent Co-Authors

Anton Batliner
Anton Batliner University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Björn Schuller
Björn Schuller Imperial College London
Andreas Maier
Andreas Maier University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Elmar Nöth
Elmar Nöth University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Florian Eyben
Florian Eyben Technical University of Munich
Joachim Hornegger
Joachim Hornegger University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
John A. Hamilton
John A. Hamilton University of Melbourne
Laurence Devillers
Laurence Devillers Sorbonne University
Felix Weninger
Felix Weninger Nuance Communications (United States)
Alessandro Vinciarelli
Alessandro Vinciarelli University of Glasgow

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to numerous online degree and career options. Students seeking a rapid entry into tech careers may consider an online associate degree, which can typically be completed within six months and lead to a range of entry-level positions.

For those interested in educational leadership or specializing in instructional technology, an online edd offers a flexible and fast-track route to advanced credentials in education-related fields.

Cost is often a key consideration for students. You can find cheap doctoral programs and minimize student debt while advancing your expertise, whether in computer science, education, or related disciplines.

Additionally, if you have interests beyond pure tech, online business degree programs offer a great foundation for tech-entrepreneurial roles or leadership positions within the tech sector.

These online pathways provide flexibility and diverse career opportunities, making it easier than ever to tailor your academic journey to your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Steidl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles