World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sebastiano Panichella

Sebastiano Panichella

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 41 8957 8705 164 163 156 5663

Sebastiano Panichella publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sebastiano Panichella between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sebastiano Panichella published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2021. 23 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2021. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 10 publications
2009 2025

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sebastiano Panichella: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 0
2011 2
2012 3
2013 6
2014 5
2015 14
2016 14
2017 10
2018 11
2019 13
2020 19
2021 34
2022 30
2023 11
2024 13
2025 10
Total 197
Download as CSV

Sebastiano Panichella publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sebastiano Panichella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 152–161 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 156 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559 156
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Sebastiano Panichella D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sebastiano Panichella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 41
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sebastiano Panichella is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple domains within computer science and engineering, with a focus on software and systems engineering. They have contributed extensively to topics related to software reliability, testing, and autonomous vehicle technology.

The main fields of study for their work are:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Their research spans several subfields including:

  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Key topics covered in their body of work include:

  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Real-time simulation and control systems

Sebastiano Panichella has published in numerous venues, with several frequent publication venues including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes

The most recent scientific papers from Panichella's research include:

  • "Predicting issue types on GitHub," 2020, published in Science of Computer Programming
  • "An empirical characterization of bad practices in continuous integration," 2020, published in Empirical Software Engineering
  • "Single and Multi-objective Test Cases Prioritization for Self-driving Cars in Virtual Environments," 2022, published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • "Automatic Detection and Repair Recommendation of Directive Defects in Java API Documentation," 2020, published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • "Machine learning-based test selection for simulation-based testing of self-driving cars software," 2023, published in Empirical Software Engineering

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Panichella include:

  • Fiorella Zampetti
  • Massimiliano Di Penta
  • Christian Birchler
  • Andrea Di Sorbo
  • Annibale Panichella

Best Publications

  • How can i improve my app? Classifying user reviews for software maintenance and evolution

    Sebastiano Panichella;Andrea Di Sorbo;Emitza Guzman;Corrado A. Visaggio

  • What would users change in my app? summarizing app reviews for recommending software changes

    Andrea Di Sorbo;Sebastiano Panichella;Carol V. Alexandru;Junji Shimagaki

  • Multi-objective Cross-Project Defect Prediction

    Gerardo Canfora;Andrea De Lucia;Massimiliano Di Penta;Rocco Oliveto

  • Who is going to mentor newcomers in open source projects

    Gerardo Canfora;Massimiliano Di Penta;Rocco Oliveto;Sebastiano Panichella

  • Recommending and localizing change requests for mobile apps based on user reviews

    Fabio Palomba;Pasquale Salza;Adelina Ciurumelea;Sebastiano Panichella

  • Analyzing reviews and code of mobile apps for better release planning

    Adelina Ciurumelea;Andreas Schaufelbuhl;Sebastiano Panichella;Harald C. Gall

  • How the Apache community upgrades dependencies: an evolutionary study

    Gabriele Bavota;Gerardo Canfora;Massimiliano Di Penta;Rocco Oliveto

  • How developers engage with static analysis tools in different contexts

    Carmine Vassallo;Sebastiano Panichella;Fabio Palomba;Sebastian Proksch

  • Using IR methods for labeling source code artifacts: Is it worthwhile?

    Andrea De Lucia;Massimiliano Di Penta;Rocco Oliveto;Annibale Panichella

  • The impact of test case summaries on bug fixing performance: an empirical investigation

    Sebastiano Panichella;Annibale Panichella;Moritz Beller;Andy Zaidman

  • ARdoc: app reviews development oriented classifier

    Sebastiano Panichella;Andrea Di Sorbo;Emitza Guzman;Corrado A. Visaggio

  • Mining source code descriptions from developer communications

    Sebastiano Panichella;Jairo Aponte;Massimiliano Di Penta;Andrian Marcus

  • The Evolution of Project Inter-dependencies in a Software Ecosystem: The Case of Apache

    Gabriele Bavota;Gerardo Canfora;Massimiliano Di Penta;Rocco Oliveto

  • Analyzing APIs documentation and code to detect directive defects

    Yu Zhou;Ruihang Gu;Taolue Chen;Zhiqiu Huang

  • Context is king: The developer perspective on the usage of static analysis tools

    Carmine Vassallo;Sebastiano Panichella;Fabio Palomba;Sebastian Proksch

  • Development Emails Content Analyzer: Intention Mining in Developer Discussions (T)

    Andrea Di Sorbo;Sebastiano Panichella;Corrado A. Visaggio;Massimiliano Di Penta

  • Improving IR‐based traceability recovery via noun‐based indexing of software artifacts

    Giovanni Capobianco;Andrea De Lucia;Rocco Oliveto;Annibale Panichella

  • Would static analysis tools help developers with code reviews

    Sebastiano Panichella;Venera Arnaoudova;Massimiliano Di Penta;Giuliano Antoniol

  • Defect prediction as a multiobjective optimization problem

    Gerardo Canfora;Andrea De Lucia;Massimiliano Di Penta;Rocco Oliveto

  • CODES: mining source code descriptions from developers discussions

    Carmine Vassallo;Sebastiano Panichella;Massimiliano Di Penta;Gerardo Canfora

  • SURF: Replication Package for: "What Would Users Change in My App? Summarizing App Reviews for Recommending Software Changes"

    Andrea Di Sorbo;Sebastiano Panichella;Carol V. Alexandru;Junji Shimagaki

Frequent Co-Authors

Harald C. Gall
Harald C. Gall University of Zurich
Gerardo Canfora
Gerardo Canfora University of Sannio
Massimiliano Di Penta
Massimiliano Di Penta University of Sannio
Rocco Oliveto
Rocco Oliveto University of Molise
Annibale Panichella
Annibale Panichella Delft University of Technology
Corrado Aaron Visaggio
Corrado Aaron Visaggio University of Sannio
Andrea De Lucia
Andrea De Lucia University of Salerno
Andy Zaidman
Andy Zaidman Delft University of Technology
Oscar Nierstrasz
Oscar Nierstrasz University of Bern
Fabio Palomba
Fabio Palomba University of Salerno

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Computer Science in the USA but want more flexible options, exploring online associate's degree programs can be a great start. These are typically affordable, take less time to complete, and can open doors to entry-level tech jobs or further study.

Budget-conscious students may find cheap online college classes particularly valuable. Many reputable institutions now offer high-quality online courses at significantly reduced tuition, enabling you to earn credits or certifications without incurring massive debt.

Students concerned about their academic record should know that there are universities for low gpa applicants. These institutions often take a holistic approach, considering life experience and motivation alongside grades to help more students access a quality education.

For those considering alternative pathways, it's also worth exploring what career possibilities exist outside of traditional tech fields. Discovering what can you do with an environmental studies degree can reveal interdisciplinary roles that blend technology, science, and sustainability. This can broaden your future opportunities and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Sebastiano Panichella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles