World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
8742
World Ranking
11028
National Ranking
549

Martin Wöllmer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Wöllmer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 92 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martin Wöllmer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Wöllmer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Wöllmer is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Health Professions. Within these domains, Wöllmer focuses on several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Philosophy.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects related to health and medicine. Notable topics include S100 Proteins and Annexins, Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, Neonatal Respiratory Health Research, Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity, Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues, Health, Medicine and Society, and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders.

Wöllmer has published in several scientific venues. The notable publication outlets include:

  • Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
  • Scientific Reports

Two recent papers considered important in their research portfolio are:

  • "Plasma calprotectin in the emergency department: a potential clinical biomarker for patients with infectious diseases" (2021), published in Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
  • "Calprotectin in the risk stratification of patients with acute dyspnoea in the emergency department" (2025), published in Scientific Reports

Collaboration forms an essential part of Wöllmer's research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Anders Larsson
  • Olle Melander
  • Torgny Wessman
  • Toralph Ruge
  • Per Wändell

The breadth of Wöllmer's work includes a mix of clinical and molecular research, with a particular emphasis on biomarkers such as calprotectin in emergency medical settings. Their interdisciplinary approach incorporates both laboratory investigation and applied clinical research.

Best Publications

  • Opensmile: the munich versatile and fast open-source audio feature extractor

    Florian Eyben;Martin Wöllmer;Björn Schuller

  • OpenEAR — Introducing the munich open-source emotion and affect recognition toolkit

    Florian Eyben;Martin Wollmer;Bjorn Schuller

  • Cross-Corpus Acoustic Emotion Recognition: Variances and Strategies

    B Schuller;B Vlasenko;F Eyben;Martin Wöllmer

  • YouTube Movie Reviews: Sentiment Analysis in an Audio-Visual Context

    M. Wollmer;F. Weninger;T. Knaup;B. Schuller

  • Abandoning Emotion Classes - Towards Continuous Emotion Recognition with Modelling of Long-Range Dependencies

    Martin Wöllmer;Florian Eyben;Stephan Reiter;Björn W. Schuller

  • LSTM-Modeling of continuous emotions in an audiovisual affect recognition framework

    Martin WöLlmer;Moritz Kaiser;Florian Eyben;BjöRn Schuller

  • Building Autonomous Sensitive Artificial Listeners

    M. Schroder;E. Bevacqua;R. Cowie;F. Eyben

  • Context-Sensitive Multimodal Emotion Recognition from Speech and Facial Expression using Bidirectional LSTM Modeling

    Martin Wöllmer;Angeliki Metallinou;Florian Eyben;Björn W. Schuller

  • Being bored? Recognising natural interest by extensive audiovisual integration for real-life application

    Björn Schuller;Ronald Müller;Florian Eyben;Jürgen Gast

  • Emotion on the road: necessity, acceptance, and feasibility of affective computing in the car

    Florian Eyben;Martin Wöllmer;Tony Poitschke;Björn Schuller

  • Online Driver Distraction Detection Using Long Short-Term Memory

    M Wollmer;C Blaschke;T Schindl;B Schuller

  • Context-Sensitive Learning for Enhanced Audiovisual Emotion Classification

    A. Metallinou;M. Wollmer;A. Katsamanis;F. Eyben

  • Combining Long Short-Term Memory and Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Incremental Emotion-Sensitive Artificial Listening

    Martin Wöllmer;Björn Schuller;Florian Eyben;Gerhard Rigoll

  • On-line Emotion Recognition in a 3-D Activation-Valence-Time Continuum using Acoustic and Linguistic Cues

    Florian Eyben;Martin Wöllmer;Alex Graves;Björn W. Schuller

  • Unsupervised learning in cross-corpus acoustic emotion recognition

    Zixing Zhang;Felix Weninger;Martin Wollmer;Bjorn Schuller

  • A multidimensional dynamic time warping algorithm for efficient multimodal fusion of asynchronous data streams

    Martin Wöllmer;Marc Al-Hames;Florian Eyben;Björn Schuller

  • YouTube Movie Reviews: In, Cross, and Open-domain Sentiment Analysis in an Audiovisual Context

    M. Wöllmer;F. Weninger;T. Knaup;B. Schuller

  • Robust discriminative keyword spotting for emotionally colored spontaneous speech using bidirectional LSTM networks

    Martin Wollmer;Florian Eyben;Joseph Keshet;Alex Graves

  • Bidirectional LSTM Networks for Context-Sensitive Keyword Detection in a Cognitive Virtual Agent Framework

    Martin Wöllmer;Florian Eyben;Alex Graves;Björn W. Schuller

  • Feature Enhancement by Deep LSTM Networks for ASR in Reverberant Multisource Environments

    Felix Weninger;Jürgen T. Geiger;Martin Wöllmer;Martin Wöllmer;Björn W. Schuller;Björn W. Schuller

  • Context-sensitive learning for enhanced audiovisual emotion classification (Extended abstract)

    Angeliki Metallinou;Athanasios Katsamanis;Martin Wollmer;Florian Eyben

Frequent Co-Authors

Björn Schuller
Björn Schuller Imperial College London
Florian Eyben
Florian Eyben Technical University of Munich
Felix Weninger
Felix Weninger Nuance Communications (United States)
Gerhard Rigoll
Gerhard Rigoll Technical University of Munich
Alex Graves
Alex Graves Google (United States)
Roddy Cowie
Roddy Cowie Queen's University Belfast
Michel Valstar
Michel Valstar University of Nottingham
Catherine Pelachaud
Catherine Pelachaud Sorbonne University
Dirk Heylen
Dirk Heylen University of Twente
Maja Pantic
Maja Pantic Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to various related fields and career journeys. As technology advances, students often explore interdisciplinary paths—whether in business, data, design, or management—by leveraging affordable and flexible online education.

For those interested in law enforcement or the justice system, understanding the cost of criminal justice degree programs online can help you plan a dual career or switch tracks without breaking the bank. Similarly, budding technologists eyeing financial sectors should check out the cost of accounting degree online for programs that can complement a technical background.

Data science is a booming field closely tied to computer science. An online masters for data science can be a powerful next step for coders seeking a specialized data-driven career.

For those who want to lead large projects or oversee tech-enabled environments, exploring the best 2 year construction management degree online programs can provide essential leadership and project management skills.

Exploring these diverse options enhances your knowledge, prepares you for emerging roles, and helps you make cost-effective educational choices.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Wöllmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles