World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 41 8722 8473 3733 3585 123 8599

Felix Weninger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Felix Weninger between 2005 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Felix Weninger published across 20 years, from 2005 to 2024, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2013. 1 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2013. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
2005 2024

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Felix Weninger: publications per year, 2005 to 2024
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 3
2011 16
2012 21
2013 26
2014 20
2015 10
2016 5
2017 4
2018 2
2019 4
2020 5
2021 4
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 125
Download as CSV

Felix Weninger publications per year - data summary

  • Felix Weninger, a Computer Science scholar from Nuance Communications (United States), has 125 publications recorded across 20 years, from 2005 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2005 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 26 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2005, 2006 and 2024, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 20 years in the span carry no publications at all (2007, 2008, 2009 and 2023).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.8 per year counting only the 16 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 12 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2005-2011: 21 publications (3.0 per year); 2012-2018: 88 publications (12.6 per year); 2019-2024: 16 publications (2.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Felix Weninger publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix Weninger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 122–131 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544 123
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Felix Weninger publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Felix Weninger, a Computer Science scholar from Nuance Communications (United States), records 123 publications - the 16th percentile of the discipline.
  • 16% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Felix Weninger, and about 84% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Felix Weninger ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Felix Weninger D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix Weninger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 41
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Felix Weninger D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Felix Weninger, a Computer Science scholar from Nuance Communications (United States), records 41 D-Index - the 40th percentile of the discipline.
  • 40% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Felix Weninger, and about 60% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Felix Weninger ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Felix Weninger is affiliated with Nuance Communications in the United States, specializing in research primarily within the field of computer science. Their work focuses on several subfields including signal processing, artificial intelligence, oceanography, computer vision and pattern recognition, and mechanics of materials.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics related to speech and audio technologies. Key areas include speech and audio processing, speech recognition and synthesis, blind source separation techniques, music and audio processing, underwater acoustics research, ultrasonics and acoustic wave propagation, and machine learning and ELM.

Weninger has contributed to multiple scientific publications, with several papers published in notable venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)
  • Interspeech 2022

Among the recent papers authored by Weninger are:

  • Conformer with dual-mode chunked attention for joint online and offline ASR, 2022, Interspeech 2022
  • Dual-Encoder Architecture with Encoder Selection for Joint Close-Talk and Far-Talk Speech Recognition, 2021, 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)
  • Semi-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentation for End-to-End ASR, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Conformer with dual-mode chunked attention for joint online and offline ASR, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators in Weninger's work include Puming Zhan, Marco Gaudesi, Jesús Andrés-Ferrer, Roberto Gemello, and Md Akmal Haidar.

The scientist's publication record indicates a substantial focus on signal processing and artificial intelligence within the broader computer science discipline. Their engagement with both theoretical and applied aspects of speech and audio processing demonstrates integration of multiple specialized fields.

Best Publications

  • Recent developments in openSMILE, the munich open-source multimedia feature extractor

    Florian Eyben;Felix Weninger;Florian Gross;Björn Schuller

  • The INTERSPEECH 2013 computational paralinguistics challenge: social signals, conflict, emotion, autism

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Alessandro Vinciarelli

  • Speech Enhancement with LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks and its Application to Noise-Robust ASR

    Felix Weninger;Hakan Erdogan;Shinji Watanabe;Emmanuel Vincent

  • YouTube Movie Reviews: Sentiment Analysis in an Audio-Visual Context

    M. Wollmer;F. Weninger;T. Knaup;B. Schuller

  • Deep Unfolding: Model-Based Inspiration of Novel Deep Architectures

    John R. Hershey;Jonathan Le Roux;Felix Weninger

  • On the Acoustics of Emotion in Audio: What Speech, Music, and Sound have in Common

    Felix Weninger;Florian Eyben;Björn W. Schuller;Björn W. Schuller;Marcello Mortillaro

  • Discriminatively trained recurrent neural networks for single-channel speech separation

    Felix Weninger;John R. Hershey;Jonathan Le Roux;Bjorn Schuller

  • The INTERSPEECH 2012 Speaker Trait Challenge

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Elmar Nöth

  • Real-life voice activity detection with LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks and an application to Hollywood movies

    Florian Eyben;Felix Weninger;Stefano Squartini;Bjorn Schuller

  • Introducing CURRENNT: the Munich open-source CUDA recurrent neural network toolkit

    Felix Weninger;Johannes Bergmann;Björn Schuller

  • The INTERSPEECH 2015 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Nativeness, Parkinson's & Eating Condition

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Simone Hantke

  • Deep NMF for speech separation

    Jonathan Le Roux;John R. Hershey;Felix Weninger

  • Single-channel speech separation with memory-enhanced recurrent neural networks

    Felix Weninger;Florian Eyben;Björn W. Schuller

  • Unsupervised learning in cross-corpus acoustic emotion recognition

    Zixing Zhang;Felix Weninger;Martin Wollmer;Bjorn Schuller

  • Discriminative NMF and its application to single-channel source separation

    Felix Weninger;Jonathan Le Roux;John R. Hershey;Shinji Watanabe

  • YouTube Movie Reviews: In, Cross, and Open-domain Sentiment Analysis in an Audiovisual Context

    M. Wöllmer;F. Weninger;T. Knaup;B. Schuller

  • Deep Recurrent De-Noising Auto-Encoder and blind de-reverberation for reverberated speech recognition

    Felix Weninger;Shinji Watanabe;Yuuki Tachioka;Björn W. Schuller

  • Robust Speech Recognition using Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks for Hybrid Acoustic Modelling

    Jürgen T. Geiger;Zixing Zhang;Felix Weninger;Björn W. Schuller

  • Using Multiple Databases for Training in Emotion Recognition: To Unite or to Vote?

    Björn W. Schuller;Zixing Zhang;Felix Weninger;Gerhard Rigoll

  • A Survey on perceived speaker traits: Personality, likability, pathology, and the first challenge

    Björn W. Schuller;Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Anton Batliner;Elmar Nöth;Elmar Nöth

  • Real-Time speech separation by semi-supervised nonnegative matrix factorization

    Cyril Joder;Felix Weninger;Florian Eyben;David Virette

  • Non-linear prediction with LSTM recurrent neural networks for acoustic novelty detection

    Erik Marchi;Fabio Vesperini;Felix Weninger;Florian Eyben

Frequent Co-Authors

Björn Schuller
Björn Schuller Imperial College London
Martin Wöllmer
Martin Wöllmer Technical University of Munich
Florian Eyben
Florian Eyben Technical University of Munich
Gerhard Rigoll
Gerhard Rigoll Technical University of Munich
Anton Batliner
Anton Batliner University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
John R. Hershey
John R. Hershey Google (United States)
Stefan Steidl
Stefan Steidl MorphoSys (Germany)
Shinji Watanabe
Shinji Watanabe Carnegie Mellon University
Jonathan Le Roux
Jonathan Le Roux Mitsubishi Electric (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to many flexible online education and career opportunities. If you’re looking to enter the tech field fast, you might explore quick certifications that pay well. These programs often take just a few months and can lead to immediate job offers in areas like IT support, cybersecurity, or web development.

If you want a more comprehensive yet rapid credential, consider a fastest online master's degree. Some of these graduate programs can be completed in as little as a year and often specialize in high-demand areas, making them a strong stepping stone for career advancement.

For those evaluating long-term value, looking into the most valuable masters degrees is a smart move. Degrees in computer science, artificial intelligence, and data analytics consistently rank among the top for job growth and salary prospects.

Additionally, those new to higher education may consider online associate degree programs as an accessible way to start. These programs can provide foundational skills and entry-level credentials, often with the option to transfer credits toward a bachelor’s degree in the future.

Best Scientists Citing Felix Weninger

Trending Scientists