World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 31 13408 13000 349 339 101 6481

Fabien Ringeval publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fabien Ringeval between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fabien Ringeval published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2016. 17 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2016. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 9 publications
2007 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fabien Ringeval: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 3
2009 4
2010 0
2011 4
2012 2
2013 4
2014 5
2015 11
2016 14
2017 11
2018 14
2019 8
2020 0
2021 7
2022 6
2023 11
2024 8
2025 9
Total 123
Download as CSV

Fabien Ringeval publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabien Ringeval sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 92–101 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 101 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421 101
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Fabien Ringeval D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabien Ringeval sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879 31
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fabien Ringeval is affiliated with Grenoble Alpes University in France, with a research focus primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their research encompasses a range of topics, notably Natural Language Processing Techniques, Speech Recognition and Synthesis, Topic Modeling, Emotion and Mood Recognition, Music and Audio Processing, Speech and Audio Processing, and Face Recognition and Analysis.

Fabien Ringeval has published extensively, including in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Computer Speech & Language, JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, and Frontiers in Digital Health.

Recent notable papers include:

  • LeBenchmark: A Reproducible Framework for Assessing Self-Supervised Representation Learning from Speech (2021, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • On the Evolution of Speech Representations for Affective Computing: A brief history and critical overview (2021, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine)
  • LeBenchmark 2.0: A standardized, replicable and enhanced framework for self-supervised representations of French speech (2024, Computer Speech & Language)
  • Effectiveness of French Language Models on Abstractive Dialogue Summarization Task (2022, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • The Value of a Virtual Assistant to Improve Engagement in Computerized Cognitive Training at Home: Exploratory Study (2024, JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies)

Frequent collaborators of Fabien Ringeval include:

  • François Portet
  • Sina Alisamir
  • Solange Rossato
  • Hippolyte Fournier
  • Marco Dinarelli

Best Publications

  • Adieu features? End-to-end speech emotion recognition using a deep convolutional recurrent network

    George Trigeorgis;Fabien Ringeval;Raymond Brueckner;Erik Marchi

  • The INTERSPEECH 2013 computational paralinguistics challenge: social signals, conflict, emotion, autism

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Alessandro Vinciarelli

  • Introducing the RECOLA multimodal corpus of remote collaborative and affective interactions

    Fabien Ringeval;Andreas Sonderegger;Juergen Sauer;Denis Lalanne

  • AVEC 2016: Depression, Mood, and Emotion Recognition Workshop and Challenge

    Michel Valstar;Jonathan Gratch;Björn Schuller;Fabien Ringeval

  • AVEC 2017: Real-life Depression, and Affect Recognition Workshop and Challenge

    Fabien Ringeval;Björn Schuller;Michel Valstar;Jonathan Gratch

  • AVEC 2019 Workshop and Challenge: State-of-Mind, Detecting Depression with AI, and Cross-Cultural Affect Recognition

    Fabien Ringeval;Björn Schuller;Michel Valstar;Nicholas Cummins

  • Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data

    Fabien Ringeval;Florian Eyben;Eleni Kroupi;Anil Yuce

  • SEWA DB: A Rich Database for Audio-Visual Emotion and Sentiment Research in the Wild

    Jean Kossaifi;Robert Walecki;Yannis Panagakis;Jie Shen

  • AV+EC 2015: The First Affect Recognition Challenge Bridging Across Audio, Video, and Physiological Data

    Fabien Ringeval;Björn Schuller;Michel Valstar;Shashank Jaiswal

  • The INTERSPEECH 2014 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Cognitive & Physical Load

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Julien Epps

  • AVEC 2018 Workshop and Challenge: Bipolar Disorder and Cross-Cultural Affect Recognition

    Fabien Ringeval;Björn Schuller;Michel Valstar;Roddy Cowie

  • At the Border of Acoustics and Linguistics: Bag-of-Audio-Words for the Recognition of Emotions in Speech.

    Maximilian Schmitt;Fabien Ringeval;Björn W. Schuller

  • AVEC 2016 - Depression, Mood, and Emotion Recognition Workshop and Challenge

    Michel Valstar;Jonathan Gratch;Bjorn Schuller;Fabien Ringeval

  • Enhanced semi-supervised learning for multimodal emotion recognition

    Zixing Zhang;Fabien Ringeval;Bin Dong;Eduardo Coutinho

  • Automatic Intonation Recognition for the Prosodic Assessment of Language-Impaired Children

    F Ringeval;J Demouy;G Szaszak;M Chetouani

  • AVEC 2015: The 5th International Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge and Workshop

    Fabien Ringeval;Bjoern Schuller;Michel Valstar;Roddy Cowie

  • Exploiting a Vowel Based Approach for Acted Emotion Recognition

    Fabien Ringeval;Mohamed Chetouani

  • Discriminatively trained recurrent neural networks for continuous dimensional emotion recognition from audio

    Felix Weninger;Fabien Ringeval;Erik Marchi;Björn Schuller

  • LeBenchmark: A Reproducible Framework for Assessing Self-Supervised Representation Learning from Speech

    Solène Evain;Ha Nguyen;Hang Le;Marcely Zanon Boito

  • Facing Realism in Spontaneous Emotion Recognition from Speech: Feature Enhancement by Autoencoder with LSTM Neural Networks.

    Zixing Zhang;Fabien Ringeval;Jing Han;Jun Deng

  • Affective and Behavioural Computing: Lessons Learnt from the First Computational Paralinguistics Challenge

    Björn W. Schuller;Björn W. Schuller;Björn W. Schuller;Felix Weninger;Yue Zhang;Yue Zhang;Fabien Ringeval

  • Summary for AVEC 2016: Depression, Mood, and Emotion Recognition Workshop and Challenge

    Michel Valstar;Jonathan Gratch;Björn Schuller;Fabien Ringeval

Frequent Co-Authors

Björn Schuller
Björn Schuller Imperial College London
Maja Pantic
Maja Pantic Imperial College London
Roddy Cowie
Roddy Cowie Queen's University Belfast
Michel Valstar
Michel Valstar University of Nottingham
Mohamed Chetouani
Mohamed Chetouani Sorbonne University
Jonathan Gratch
Jonathan Gratch University of Southern California
Nicholas Cummins
Nicholas Cummins King's College London
Florian Eyben
Florian Eyben Technical University of Munich
Anton Batliner
Anton Batliner University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Klaus R. Scherer
Klaus R. Scherer University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to multiple education and career opportunities. Many students leverage associate's degree online programs to quickly build technical skills and enter the workforce sooner. These programs offer flexibility and a solid foundation in core computing concepts.

For those looking to enhance their credentials even further, pursuing one of the most useful graduate degrees in areas like data science or software engineering can make a significant impact on job prospects. If time is a concern, you may be interested in one of the shortest masters degree options that deliver valuable knowledge in as little as 12-18 months.

In addition to formal degrees, earning certifications for jobs in IT or computer science is a practical way to demonstrate specialized expertise and increase earning potential. These alternatives provide targeted training for high-demand skills, supporting both career starters and established professionals looking to upskill. With so many flexible pathways, a future in computer science is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Fabien Ringeval

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles