World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sander M. Daselaar

Sander M. Daselaar

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
10346
World Ranking
9389
National Ranking
256

Sander M. Daselaar publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sander M. Daselaar sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 52 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sander M. Daselaar D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sander M. Daselaar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sander M. Daselaar is a researcher affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their academic work is associated with this institution, indicating a focus on research activities within this university environment.

Information regarding recent papers authored by Sander M. Daselaar is not available, and there is also no data regarding frequent co-authors or predominant publication venues. This lack of specific details on these aspects limits an overview of collaboration networks or publication trends.

There are no listed book publications or data on main fields and subfields of study for this researcher. Similarly, no information is provided concerning main topics of work, which suggests that a detailed description of their thematic research focus cannot be established from the available data.

No awards have been documented in relation to Sander M. Daselaar, and there is no indication of the researcher being deceased. Therefore, the profile reflects their current standing as an active researcher.

Best Publications

  • Qué PASA? The Posterior–Anterior Shift in Aging

    Simon W. Davis;Nancy A. Dennis;Sander M. Daselaar;Mathias S. Fleck

  • Task-independent and Task-specific Age Effects on Brain Activity during Working Memory, Visual Attention and Episodic Retrieval

    Roberto Cabeza;Sander M. Daselaar;Florin Dolcos;Steven E. Prince

  • Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: recollection, familiarity, and novelty.

    Sander M Daselaar;Mathias S. Fleck;Roberto E. Cabeza

  • Brain Activity during Episodic Retrieval of Autobiographical and Laboratory Events: An fMRI Study using a Novel Photo Paradigm

    Roberto Cabeza;Steve E. Prince;Sander M. Daselaar;Daniel L. Greenberg

  • Effects of healthy aging on hippocampal and rhinal memory functions: an event-related fMRI study.

    Sander M. Daselaar;Mathias S. Fleck;Ian G. Dobbins;David J. Madden

  • When less means more: deactivations during encoding that predict subsequent memory.

    Sander M. Daselaar;Steven E. Prince;Roberto Cabeza

  • The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Autobiographical Memory: Neural Correlates of Recall, Emotional Intensity, and Reliving

    Sander M. Daselaar;Heather J. Rice;Daniel L. Greenberg;Daniel L. Greenberg;Roberto Cabeza

  • Neural correlates of relational memory: successful encoding and retrieval of semantic and perceptual associations

    Steven E. Prince;Sander M. Daselaar;Roberto Cabeza

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of episodic encoding and retrieval in young and elderly subjects

    S.M. Daselaar;D.J. Veltman;S.A.R.B. Rombouts;J.G.W. Raaijmakers

  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

    S.M. Daselaar;S.E. Prince;N.A. Dennis;S.M. Hayes

  • Role of Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Regions in Decision-Making Processes Shared by Memory and Nonmemory Tasks

    Mathias S. Fleck;Sander M. Daselaar;Ian G. Dobbins;Roberto Cabeza

  • Posterior midline and ventral parietal activity is associated with retrieval success and encoding failure.

    Sander M. Daselaar;Steven E. Prince;Nancy A. Dennis;Scott M. Hayes

  • Similar network activated by young and old adults during the acquisition of a motor sequence

    Sander M. Daselaar;Serge A.R.B. Rombouts;Dick J. Veltman;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers

  • The Hippocampus Is Coupled with the Default Network during Memory Retrieval but Not during Memory Encoding

    Willem Huijbers;Cyriel M. A. Pennartz;Roberto Cabeza;Sander M. Daselaar

  • Less Wiring, More Firing: Low-Performing Older Adults Compensate for Impaired White Matter with Greater Neural Activity

    Sander M. Daselaar;Vijeth Iyengar;Simon W. Davis;Karl Eklund

  • Modality-specific and modality-independent components of the human imagery system.

    Sander M. Daselaar;Yuval Porat;Willem Huijbers;Cyriel M.A. Pennartz

  • Effects of aging on transient and sustained successful memory encoding activity

    Nancy A. Dennis;Sander Daselaar;Roberto Cabeza

  • Overlapping brain activity between episodic memory encoding and retrieval: roles of the task-positive and task-negative networks.

    Hongkeun Kim;Sander M Daselaar;Roberto Cabeza

  • Functional neuroimaging of cognitive aging.

    S.M. Daselaar;J Browndyke;R. Cabeza

  • Explaining the encoding/retrieval flip: memory-related deactivations and activations in the posteromedial cortex.

    W. Huijbers;W. Huijbers;P. Vannini;R.A. Sperling;C.M.A. Pennartz

  • Deep processing activates the medial temporal lobe in young but not in old adults.

    Sander M. Daselaar;Dick J. Veltman;Serge A.R.B. Rombouts;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers

Frequent Co-Authors

Roberto Cabeza
Roberto Cabeza Duke University
Cyriel M. A. Pennartz
Cyriel M. A. Pennartz University of Amsterdam
Dick J. Veltman
Dick J. Veltman Amsterdam UMC
Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers
Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers University of Amsterdam
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts Leiden University
Roy P.C. Kessels
Roy P.C. Kessels Radboud University
David C. Rubin
David C. Rubin Duke University
Nancy A. Dennis
Nancy A. Dennis Pennsylvania State University
Kevin S. LaBar
Kevin S. LaBar Duke University
Florin Dolcos
Florin Dolcos University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in a flexible approach to your education? Many students pursue accelerated bachelors programs in neuroscience and related fields. These online pathways let motivated learners graduate faster and launch their careers sooner.

If future earning potential is a priority, it’s also worth exploring the most valuable degree in the world and other lucrative college options. Neuroscience is closely aligned with some of the best majors in college for students seeking impactful, high-paying jobs in healthcare, biotech, and research.

Budget is another important consideration. Many students can lower costs by enrolling in the cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa. These institutions provide quality, accredited online neuroscience and related degrees while supporting federal student aid eligibility.

Choosing the right degree path in neuroscience opens doors to diverse careers—in labs, medicine, mental health, and beyond—while providing options for faster graduation, high salaries, and affordable tuition.

Best Scientists Citing Sander M. Daselaar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles