World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers

Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
8999
World Ranking
10031
National Ranking
445

Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands.

There is no publicly listed information regarding recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues connected to Raaijmakers. Similarly, no data is available about book publications, specific fields or subfields of study, or particular topics they have researched.

There are no recorded awards or honors attributed to Raaijmakers in the data provided.

Due to the limited available information, a detailed overview of their research contributions or impact in their field cannot be constructed at this time.

Best Publications

  • Search of associative memory.

    Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers;Richard M. Shiffrin

  • A model for interference and forgetting

    Ger-Jan Mensink;Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers

  • How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions.

    Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers;Joseph M.C. Schrijnemakers;Frans Gremmen

  • SAM: A theory of probabilistic search in associative memory.

    Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers;Richard M. Shiffrin

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of episodic encoding and retrieval in young and elderly subjects

    S.M. Daselaar;D.J. Veltman;S.A.R.B. Rombouts;J.G.W. Raaijmakers

  • Models for recall and recognition.

    Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers;Richard M. Shiffrin

  • Statistical analysis of the Michaelis-Menten equation.

    Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers

  • Similar network activated by young and old adults during the acquisition of a motor sequence

    Sander M. Daselaar;Serge A.R.B. Rombouts;Dick J. Veltman;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers

  • Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: application of the SAM model

    Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers

  • A further look at the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy.

    Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers

  • How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: a flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t test.

    Ruud Wetzels;Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers;Emöke Jakab;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

  • Rethinking inhibition theory: On the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting

    Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers;Emőke Jakab

  • Alzheimer's disease versus normal ageing: a review of the efficiency of clinical and experimental memory measures.

    Pauline E.J. Spaan;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers;Cees Jonker

  • Deep processing activates the medial temporal lobe in young but not in old adults.

    Sander M. Daselaar;Dick J. Veltman;Serge A.R.B. Rombouts;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers

  • A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Mark Steyvers;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers;Richard M. Shiffrin

  • Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation.

    Diane Pecher;René Zeelenberg;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers

  • The story of the two-store model of memory: past criticisms, current status, and future directions

    Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers

  • A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification.

    Lael J. Schooler;Richard M. Shiffrin;Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers

  • A model for contextual fluctuation

    Ger-Jan M Mensink;Jeroen G.W Raaijmakers

  • Decision making in dynamic task environments

    José H. Kerstholt;Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers

  • Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock: W.E. Hockley and S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Wiley, New York, 1992

    Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers

  • Book reviewMemory in context: Context in memory : G.M. Davies and D.M. Thomson (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1988. £34.95

    Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers

Frequent Co-Authors

René Zeelenberg
René Zeelenberg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Richard M. Shiffrin
Richard M. Shiffrin Indiana University
Sander M. Daselaar
Sander M. Daselaar Radboud University
Dick J. Veltman
Dick J. Veltman Amsterdam UMC
Diane Pecher
Diane Pecher Erasmus University Rotterdam
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts Leiden University
Mark Steyvers
Mark Steyvers University of California, Irvine
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Wilson S. Geisler
Wilson S. Geisler The University of Texas at Austin
Susan T. Dumais
Susan T. Dumais Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA can open doors to rewarding online degrees and career pathways. Many students pursue further education and specialized certification, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), to advance in the field.

The process for earning a BCBA credential varies by location. For example, you can learn about El Paso bcba requirements as well as understand the Fort Wayne bcba requirements if you are considering practicing in different cities. Each region may have its own educational prerequisites and supervised fieldwork expectations.

If you’re interested in Texas, you can explore details regarding how to become a bcba in Fort Worth. Meanwhile, those thinking about California can review Fremont bcba education requirements. Reviewing local requirements helps you plan your academic journey and meet all licensure criteria for your chosen area.

Whether you study online or on campus, understanding these steps supports your progress toward a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles