World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
4270
World Ranking
11179
National Ranking
483

René Zeelenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where René Zeelenberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

René Zeelenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where René Zeelenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

René Zeelenberg is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology as well as social psychology, artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, and sensory systems.

Their work concentrates on topics such as neurobiology of language and bilingualism, multisensory perception and integration, olfactory and sensory function studies, categorization, perception, and language, action observation and synchronization, child and animal learning development, and language, metaphor, and cognition.

René Zeelenberg has published in several academic venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Memory & Cognition
  • Cognition
  • Cortex
  • Journal of Cognition
  • Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)

The following are examples of recent papers authored or coauthored by René Zeelenberg:

  • "The Influence of Poststudy Action Congruency on Memory Consolidation," 2020, Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)
  • "Non-native language comprehenders encode implied shapes of objects in memory," 2024, Cortex

Other relevant publications in which René Zeelenberg is not the first author but related to their research include:

  • "Does multisensory study benefit memory for pictures and sounds?," 2022, Cognition
  • "Automatic mental simulation in native and non-native speakers," 2024, Memory & Cognition
  • "NewAbstractConcepts: A Database of 42 Normed Abstract Concepts and Exemplars," 2024, Journal of Cognition

René Zeelenberg collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Diane Pecher
  • Samuel J. A. van Zuijlen
  • Sharon Singh
  • Kevin Gunawan
  • Mirthe E M van der Meijden

Best Publications

  • Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs

    Diane Pecher;René Zeelenberg;Lawrence W. Barsalou

  • Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988)

    E. J. Wagenmakers;Titia Beek;Laura Dijkhoff;Quentin F. Gronau

  • Emotion Improves and Impairs Early Vision

    Bruno R. Bocanegra;René Zeelenberg

  • Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing

    Saskia Van Dantzig;Diane Pecher;René Zeelenberg;Lawrence W. Barsalou

  • Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation

    Diane Pecher;Diane Pecher;René Zeelenberg;Lawrence W. Barsalou

  • The Impact of Emotion on Perception Bias or Enhanced Processing

    René Zeelenberg;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Mark Rotteveel

  • Evidence for long-term cross-language repetition priming in conceptual implicit memory tasks

    René Zeelenberg;René Zeelenberg;Diane Pecher

  • Dissociating emotion-induced blindness and hypervision.

    Bruno R Bocanegra;René Zeelenberg

  • A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Mark Steyvers;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers;Richard M. Shiffrin

  • Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation.

    Diane Pecher;René Zeelenberg;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers

  • Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology

    Rolf A. Zwaan;Diane Pecher;Gabriele Paolacci;Samantha Bouwmeester

  • Language comprehenders retain implied shape and orientation of objects

    Diane Pecher;Saskia van Dantzig;Rolf A. Zwaan;René Zeelenberg

  • Emotion-induced trade-offs in spatiotemporal vision.

    Bruno R. Bocanegra;Rene Zeelenberg

  • Turning up the noise or turning down the volume? On the nature of the impairment of episodic recognition memory by midazolam.

    Kenneth J. Malmberg;Rene Zeelenberg;Richard M. Shiffrin

  • Auditory emotional cues enhance visual perception.

    René Zeelenberg;Bruno R. Bocanegra

  • A sharp image or a sharp knife: norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items

    Saskia van Dantzig;Rosemary A. Cowell;René Zeelenberg;Diane Pecher

  • False memories and lexical decision: even twelve primes do not cause long-term semantic priming.

    Ren e Zeelenberg;Diane Pecher

  • Are Independent Probes Truly Independent

    Gino Camp;Diane Pecher;Henk G. Schmidt;Rene Zeelenberg

  • Semantic context effects and priming in word association

    René Zeelenberg;Diane Pecher;Richard M. Shiffrin;Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers

  • Nonword repetition priming in lexical decision reverses as a function of study task and speed stress.

    Rene Zeelenberg;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Richard M. Shiffrin

Frequent Co-Authors

Diane Pecher
Diane Pecher Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers
Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers University of Amsterdam
Richard M. Shiffrin
Richard M. Shiffrin Indiana University
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Rolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Lawrence W. Barsalou
Lawrence W. Barsalou University of Glasgow
Agneta H. Fischer
Agneta H. Fischer University of Amsterdam
Piotr Winkielman
Piotr Winkielman University of California, San Diego
Mark Steyvers
Mark Steyvers University of California, Irvine
Jamin Halberstadt
Jamin Halberstadt University of Otago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning an online psychology degree opens doors to various career pathways, including the field of marriage and family therapy (MFT). Becoming a licensed MFT requires completing a specialized graduate program, fulfilling supervised clinical experience, and passing state-specific exams. Each state has unique requirements that aspiring therapists must meet. For example, those interested in mft requirements in Port St. Lucie will find specific education and licensure steps to follow in Florida.

If you wish to explore opportunities in Oregon, understanding how to become a marriage and family therapist in Portland is key, as the path to licensure there may differ from other states. Similarly, becoming an MFT in North Carolina involves meeting Raleigh mft education requirements. In Nevada, future therapists must know how to become a marriage and family therapist in Reno.

Whether beginning with a general psychology program or focusing directly on MFT, researching online degree options and state-specific licensure is important for building a successful counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing René Zeelenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles