World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Arnaud D'Argembeau

Arnaud D'Argembeau

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3838 3536 50 47 207 15282

Arnaud D'Argembeau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Arnaud D'Argembeau between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Arnaud D'Argembeau published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2025. 36 of the 263 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2025. 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 23 publications
2003 2025

263 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Arnaud D'Argembeau: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 5
2004 7
2005 6
2006 7
2007 8
2008 12
2009 9
2010 13
2011 11
2012 12
2013 4
2014 10
2015 13
2016 21
2017 16
2018 13
2019 12
2020 17
2021 8
2022 11
2023 12
2024 13
2025 23
Total 263
Download as CSV

Arnaud D'Argembeau publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnaud D'Argembeau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 207 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 207
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Arnaud D'Argembeau D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnaud D'Argembeau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Arnaud D'Argembeau is affiliated with the University of Liège in Belgium and works primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology. Their research integrates Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, with additional contributions in Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's research focuses extensively on memory processes and influences, particularly exploring identity, memory, and therapy. Their work also addresses memory and neural mechanisms, psychological and temporal perspectives research, as well as areas intersecting anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Neural dynamics and brain function, along with neural and behavioral psychology studies, are among the main topics covered in their publications.

Some of the frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Memory
  • Memory & Cognition
  • Consciousness and Cognition
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy

Their recent published papers include:

  • "Zooming In and Out on One's Life: Autobiographical Representations at Multiple Time Scales", 2020, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "Changing the future: An initial test of Future Specificity Training (FeST)", 2020, Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • "The Blursday database as a resource to study subjective temporalities during COVID-19", 2022, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Drowsiness or mind-wandering? Fluctuations in ocular parameters during attentional lapses", 2020, Biological Psychology
  • "Reducing Anhedonia in Major Depressive Disorder with Future Event Specificity Training (FEST): A Randomized Controlled Trial", 2022, Cognitive Therapy and Research

Collaboration is an aspect of their research activity, frequently coauthoring with:

  • David John Hallford
  • Olivier Jeunehomme
  • Filip Raes
  • Nathan Leroy
  • David Stawarczyk

Best Publications

  • Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: Influence of valence and temporal distance

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;Martial Van der Linden

  • Self-referential reflective activity and its relationship with rest: a PET study.

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;Fabienne Collette;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden;Steven Laureys

  • Distinct Regions of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Are Associated with Self-referential Processing and Perspective Taking

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;Perrine Ruby;Fabienne Collette;Christian Degueldre

  • Individual differences in the phenomenology of mental time travel: The effect of vivid visual imagery and emotion regulation strategies.

    Arnaud D’Argembeau;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden

  • Mind-wandering: phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method.

    David Stawarczyk;Steve Majerus;Michalina Maj;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden

  • Frequency, characteristics and functions of future‐oriented thoughts in daily life

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;Olivier Renaud;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden

  • The Iowa Gambling Task in fMRI images.

    Xiangrui Li;Zhong Lin Lu;Arnaud D'Argembeau;Marie Ng

  • Remembering the past and imagining the future in schizophrenia

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;Stéphane Raffard;Martial Van der Linden

  • Tracking the construction of episodic future thoughts.

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;Arnaud Mathy

  • Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for positive, negative, and neutral events

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;Christine Comblain;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden

  • Neural Correlates of Ongoing Conscious Experience: Both Task-Unrelatedness and Stimulus-Independence Are Related to Default Network Activity

    David Stawarczyk;Steve Majerus;Pierre Maquet;Arnaud D'Argembeau

  • On the role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in self-processing: the valuation hypothesis.

    Arnaud D'Argembeau

  • Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for emotional and neutral events in older and younger adults.

    Christine Comblain;Arnaud D'Argembeau;Martial Van der Linden

  • Sleep-Related Hippocampo-Cortical Interplay during Emotional Memory Recollection

    Virginie Sterpenich;Geneviève Albouy;Mélanie Boly;Gilles Vandewalle

  • The Locus Ceruleus Is Involved in the Successful Retrieval of Emotional Memories in Humans

    Virginie Sterpenich;Arnaud D’Argembeau;Martin Desseilles;Evelyne Balteau

  • Neural correlates of envisioning emotional events in the near and far future.

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;Arnaud D'Argembeau;Gui Xue;Zhong-Lin Lu;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden

  • Remembering pride and shame: Self-enhancement and the phenomenology of autobiographical memory

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;Martial Van der Linden

  • The neural basis of personal goal processing when envisioning future events

    Arnaud D'Argembeau;David Stawarczyk;Steve Majerus;Fabienne Collette

  • Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) : psychometric properties of the French translation and exploration of its relations with emotion regulation strategies

    Françoise Jermann;Joël Billieux;Frank Larøi;Arnaud d'Argembeau

  • Narrative identity in schizophrenia.

    Stephane Raffard;Arnaud D'Argembeau;Claudia Lardi;Sophie Bayard

Frequent Co-Authors

Martial Van der Linden
Martial Van der Linden University of Geneva
Steve Majerus
Steve Majerus University of Liège
Eric Salmon
Eric Salmon University of Liège
Fabienne Collette
Fabienne Collette University of Liège
Christine Bastin
Christine Bastin University of Liège
Pierre Maquet
Pierre Maquet University of Liège
Evelyne Balteau
Evelyne Balteau University of Liège
André Luxen
André Luxen University of Liège
Christian Degueldre
Christian Degueldre University of Liège
Stéphane Raffard
Stéphane Raffard University of Montpellier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees have become increasingly popular for students seeking flexibility and quality education. Many universities across the U.S. now offer comprehensive online master’s programs in psychology, allowing students to tailor their studies to match their career goals and schedules.

Each state offers unique program strengths. For example, students interested in the best online psychology master's program rankings in California will find options focusing on clinical, counseling, and research domains. Meanwhile, the online psychology master's degrees in Florida are known for their diversity in concentrations—such as forensic, industrial-organizational, or school psychology.

In the Midwest, the best online master's in psychology degree programs ranking in Kansas highlight practical approaches to mental health services and applied behavioral research. Likewise, the best online psychology master's degree rankings in New York showcase top programs focused on therapy practices, psychometrics, and advanced theoretical studies.

Graduates of these programs can pursue careers in clinical practice, counseling, research, human resources, or further doctoral studies. Choosing the right online program is key to opening varied and rewarding career pathways in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Arnaud D'Argembeau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles