World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel Pérusse

Daniel Pérusse

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
11108
World Ranking
6853
National Ranking
459

Daniel Pérusse publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Pérusse sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel Pérusse D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Pérusse sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Pérusse is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada. Their research contributions primarily span the fields of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Cognitive Neuroscience. The researcher's work frequently appears in the domain of neuroimaging with a focus on advanced imaging techniques and brain connectivity studies.

The main topics covered by Daniel Pérusse include:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Recent publications by Daniel Pérusse highlight their engagement with both methodological and application-oriented neuroinformatics research. Notable papers include:

  • A Standardized Protocol for Efficient and Reliable Quality Control of Brain Registration in Functional MRI Studies, 2020, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
  • THG volume 23 issue 3 Cover and Front matter, 2020, Twin Research and Human Genetics
  • THG volume 23 issue 4 Cover and Front matter, 2020, Twin Research and Human Genetics
  • THG volume 23 issue 2 Cover and Front matter, 2020, Twin Research and Human Genetics
  • THG volume 24 issue 5 Cover and Front matter, 2021, Twin Research and Human Genetics

The recurring presence of publications in Twin Research and Human Genetics indicates a sustained research interest in genetic epidemiology and twin studies, often overlapping with neuroimaging techniques.

Frequent collaborators alongside Daniel Pérusse include:

  • Nicholas G. Martin
  • Jeffrey M. Craig
  • Yoon-Mi Hur
  • Jaakko Kaprio
  • Cornelis B. Lambalk

These collaborations potentially bridge interdisciplinary approaches combining genetics, neuroimaging, and epidemiological studies.

The venues where Daniel Pérusse commonly publishes are:

  • Twin Research and Human Genetics
  • Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

Daniel Pérusse's body of work contributes to the methodological foundations and practical applications of neuroimaging as it relates to genetics and brain function. The combination of advanced imaging and twin-based genetic studies offers insights into both structural and functional brain connectivity, supporting research that integrates neuroinformatics with human genetics.

Best Publications

  • Physical Aggression During Early Childhood: Trajectories and Predictors

    Richard E. Tremblay;Daniel S. Nagin;Jean R. Seguin;M. Zoccolillo

  • The search for the age of 'onset' of physical aggression: Rousseau and Bandura revisited

    Richard E. Tremblay;Christa Japel;Daniel Perusse;Pierre Mcduff

  • Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels

    Daniel Pérusse

  • Sexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness, and Facial Neoteny: Cross-cultural Evidence and Implications [and Comments and Reply]

    Doug Jones;C. Loring Brace;William Jankowiak;Kevin N. Laland

  • Gender differences in physical aggression: A prospective population-based survey of children before and after 2 years of age

    Raymond H. Baillargeon;Mark Zoccolillo;Kate Keenan;Sylvana Côté

  • Physical Aggression and Expressive Vocabulary in 19-Month-Old Twins

    Ginette Dionne;Richard Tremblay;Michel Boivin;David Laplante

  • The genetic-environmental etiology of parents' perceptions and self-assessed behaviours toward their 5-month-old infants in a large twin and singleton sample.

    Michel Boivin;Daniel Pérusse;Ginette Dionne;Valérie Saysset

  • Genetic and environmental contributions to weight, height, and BMI from birth to 19 years of age: an international study of over 12,000 twin pairs.

    Lise Dubois;Kirsten Ohm Kyvik;Kirsten Ohm Kyvik;Manon Girard;Fabiola Tatone-Tokuda

  • Early child language mediates the relation between home environment and school readiness.

    Nadine Forget-Dubois;Ginette Dionne;Jean-Pascal Lemelin;Daniel Pérusse

  • Examining genetic and environmental effects on reactive versus proactive aggression

    Mara Brendgen;Frank Vitaro;Michel Boivin;Ginette Dionne

  • The genetic-environmental etiology of cognitive school readiness and later academic achievement in early childhood.

    Jean-Pascal Lemelin;Michel Boivin;Nadine Forget-Dubois;Ginette Dionne

  • Validating psychiatric endophenotypes: Inhibitory control and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Jennifer Crosbie;Daniel Pérusse;Cathy L. Barr;Russell J. Schachar

  • The effect of template choice on morphometric analysis of pediatric brain data.

    Uicheul Yoon;Vladimir S. Fonov;Daniel Perusse;Alan C. Evans

  • Examining Genetic and Environmental Effects on Social Aggression: A Study of 6-Year-Old Twins.

    Mara Brendgen;Ginette Dionne;Alain Girard;Michel Boivin

  • Human parental behavior: evidence for genetic influence and potential implication for gene-culture transmission.

    Daniel Pérusse;Michael C. Neale;Andrew C. Heath;Lindon J. Eaves

  • Depression and parental bonding: Cause, consequence, or genetic covariance?

    Michael C. Neale;Ellen Walters;Andrew C. Heath;Ronald C. Kessler

  • Gestational diabetes hinders language development in offspring.

    Ginette Dionne;Michel Boivin;Jean R Séguin;Daniel Pérusse

  • Physical aggression and expressive vocabulary in 19-month-old twins.

    Unknown

  • Variations in Heritability of Cortisol Reactivity to Stress as a Function of Early Familial Adversity Among 19-Month-Old Twins

    Isabelle Ouellet-Morin;Michel Boivin;Ginette Dionne;Sonia J. Lupien

  • Relations between Theory of Mind and Indirect and Physical Aggression in Kindergarten: Evidence of the Moderating Role of Prosocial Behaviors

    Annie Renouf;Mara R. Brendgen;Sophie Parent;Frank Vitaro

  • Diagnosing zygosity in infant twins: physical similarity, genotyping, and chorionicity.

    Nadine Forget-Dubois;Daniel Pérusse;Gustavo Turecki;Alain Girard

  • Physical aggression during early childhood

    Richard E. Tremblay;Daniel S. Nagin;Jean R. Séguin;Mark Zoccolillo

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard E. Tremblay
Richard E. Tremblay University of Montreal
Michel Boivin
Michel Boivin Université Laval
Ginette Dionne
Ginette Dionne Université Laval
Mara Brendgen
Mara Brendgen University of Quebec at Montreal
Frank Vitaro
Frank Vitaro University of Montreal
Mark Zoccolillo
Mark Zoccolillo McGill University
Isabelle Ouellet-Morin
Isabelle Ouellet-Morin University of Montreal
Jean R. Séguin
Jean R. Séguin University of Montreal
Alan C. Evans
Alan C. Evans McGill University
Jaakko Kaprio
Jaakko Kaprio University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding career paths, including roles in counseling, social work, and therapy. One popular specialization is marriage and family therapy (MFT), which requires both dedicated study and specific licensing steps.

Prospective therapists should be aware that requirements differ by location. For instance, those interested in Dallas should review the Dallas mft certification requirements to understand local standards. Similarly, if you are considering Denver, it’s important to learn how to become an mft in Denver.

Detroit has its own pathway, so reviewing the Detroit mft certification requirements can help you prepare for that local market. Those interested in North Carolina can explore how to become a marriage and family therapist in Durham for tailored guidance. Many institutions now offer online psychology degrees and hybrid programs, giving students more flexibility as they work toward fulfilling these regional requirements and building a meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Pérusse

Trending Scientists