World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rebecca Jane Barthelmie

Rebecca Jane Barthelmie

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
66
Citations
16267
World Ranking
2091
National Ranking
856

Rebecca Jane Barthelmie publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Jane Barthelmie sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 341 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Rebecca Jane Barthelmie D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Jane Barthelmie sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rebecca Jane Barthelmie is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on wind energy within engineering and environmental science disciplines, integrating aspects of earth and planetary sciences.

The scientist's work spans several key fields of study:

  • Engineering
  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these broader areas, their research covers specific subfields including:

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

The main research topics addressed are:

  • Wind Energy Research and Development
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Wind and Air Flow Studies
  • Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Climate variability and models
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Energy Load and Power Forecasting

Frequent collaborators include:

  • S. C. Pryor
  • Tristan J. Shepherd
  • Frederick Letson
  • Jacob Coburn
  • Jeanie A. Aird

They have published extensively in journals such as:

  • Journal of Physics Conference Series
  • Energies
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Wind energy science
  • Climate

Selected recent papers include:

  • Climate change impacts on wind power generation, 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • A global assessment of extreme wind speeds for wind energy applications, 2021, Nature Energy
  • Wind power production from very large offshore wind farms, 2021, Joule
  • Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Wind Energy, 2021, Climate
  • Occurrence of Low-Level Jets over the Eastern U.S. Coastal Zone at Heights Relevant to Wind Energy, 2022, Energies

Best Publications

  • Analytical modelling of wind speed deficit in large offshore wind farms

    Sten Tronæs Frandsen;Rebecca Jane Barthelmie;S.C. Pryor;Ole Rathmann

  • Modelling and measuring flow and wind turbine wakes in large wind farms offshore

    Rebecca Jane Barthelmie;Kurt Schaldemose Hansen;Sten Tronæs Frandsen;Ole Rathmann

  • Climate change impacts on wind energy: A review

    S.C. Pryor;R.J. Barthelmie

  • The impact of turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability on power deficits due to wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm

    Kurt Schaldemose Hansen;Rebecca J. Barthelmie;Leo E. Jensen;Anders Sommer

  • Quantifying the Impact of Wind Turbine Wakes on Power Output at Offshore Wind Farms

    Rebecca Jane Barthelmie;Sara Pryor;Sten Tronæs Frandsen;Kurt Schaldemose Hansen

  • Comparison of Wake Model Simulations with Offshore Wind Turbine Wake Profiles Measured by Sodar

    R. J. Barthelmie;G. C. Larsen;S. T. Frandsen;L. Folkerts

  • Wind speed trends over the contiguous United States

    S. C. Pryor;R. J. Barthelmie;D. T. Young;Eugene S. Takle

  • Evaluation of wind farm efficiency and wind turbine wakes at the Nysted offshore wind farm

    Rebecca Jane Barthelmie;L.E. Jensen

  • Modelling and measurements of power losses and turbulence intensity in wind turbine wakes at Middelgrunden offshore wind farm

    R. J. Barthelmie;S. T. Frandsen;M. N. Nielsen;S. C. Pryor

  • Climate change impacts on wind power generation

    Sara C. Pryor;Rebecca J. Barthelmie;Melissa S. Bukovsky;L. Ruby Leung

  • Offshore Wind Energy in Europe— A Review of the State-of-the-Art

    Andrew R. Henderson;Colin Morgan;Bernie Smith;Hans C. Sørensen

  • Potential climate change impact on wind energy resources in northern Europe: analyses using a regional climate model

    S C Pryor;R J Barthelmie;Erik Kjellström

  • Modeling wake effects in large wind farms in complex terrain: the problem, the methods and the issues

    E.S. Politis;J. Prospathopoulos;D. Cabezon;Kurt Schaldemose Hansen

  • A review of measurement and modelling results of particle atmosphere–surface exchange

    Sara Pryor;M. Gallagher;H. Sievering;Søren Ejling Larsen

  • Wind energy research: State-of-the-art and future research directions

    D.J. Willis;C. Niezrecki;D. Kuchma;E. Hines

  • Importance of thermal effects and sea surface roughness for offshore wind resource assessment

    Bernhard Lange;Søren Larsen;Jørgen Højstrup;Rebecca Barthelmie

  • Empirical downscaling of wind speed probability distributions

    S C. Pryor;Justin T. Schoof;Justin T. Schoof;R J. Barthelmie

  • Modelling and measurements of wakes in large wind farms

    Rebecca Jane Barthelmie;Ole Rathmann;Sten Tronæs Frandsen;K. Hansen

  • Assessing climate change impacts on the near-term stability of the wind energy resource over the United States

    S. C. Pryor;R. J. Barthelmie

  • The Perdigão: Peering into Microscale Details of Mountain Winds

    H. J. S. Fernando;J. Mann;J. M. L. M. Palma;Julie K. Lundquist

  • Power deficits due to wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm

    Kurt Schaldemose Hansen;Rebecca Barthelmie;Leo E. Jensen;Anders Sommer

Frequent Co-Authors

Sara C. Pryor
Sara C. Pryor Cornell University
Søren Ejling Larsen
Søren Ejling Larsen Technical University of Denmark
Charlotte Bay Hasager
Charlotte Bay Hasager Technical University of Denmark
Gunner Chr. Larsen
Gunner Chr. Larsen Technical University of Denmark
Trevor D. Davies
Trevor D. Davies University of East Anglia
Morten Nielsen
Morten Nielsen Technical University of Denmark
Georges Kariniotakis
Georges Kariniotakis Mines ParisTech
Jakob Mann
Jakob Mann Technical University of Denmark
Erik Kjellström
Erik Kjellström Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
George Kallos
George Kallos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Environmental Sciences, understanding related online degrees can broaden career options and enhance interdisciplinary knowledge. Many professionals expand their expertise by pursuing degrees such as an online sociology bachelor program, which offers insights into societal impacts on environmental policies and community engagement.

Public administration roles are also vital to environmental advocacy, and choosing from the easiest online MPA programs can provide practical leadership skills without demanding overly lengthy commitments. This flexibility is ideal for working professionals balancing multiple responsibilities.

For those interested in educational leadership or policy-making within environmental education, advanced online programs are a great fit. Programs like EdD without dissertation requirements allow students to progress efficiently without the traditional dissertation barrier. Additionally, transitioning from EdS to EdD programs offers a clear pathway for deepening expertise and advancing academic credentials.

By integrating knowledge from these related disciplines and degree pathways, graduates can position themselves at the forefront of environmental science careers, combining scientific understanding with public policy, education, and social frameworks.

Explore these options further to find the best program that aligns with your career goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca Jane Barthelmie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles