World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rebecca Jane Barthelmie

Rebecca Jane Barthelmie

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 66 2094 1998 856 791 341 16267

Rebecca Jane Barthelmie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rebecca Jane Barthelmie between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rebecca Jane Barthelmie published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2005. 18 of the 374 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2005. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 9 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 24 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 8 publications
1986 2025

374 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rebecca Jane Barthelmie: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 9
1997 3
1998 8
1999 10
2000 7
2001 18
2002 13
2003 24
2004 13
2005 27
2006 17
2007 18
2008 14
2009 15
2010 12
2011 7
2012 6
2013 11
2014 9
2015 5
2016 7
2017 8
2018 13
2019 9
2020 21
2021 10
2022 12
2023 20
2024 10
2025 8
Total 374
Download as CSV

Rebecca Jane Barthelmie publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Jane Barthelmie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–350 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 341 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83 341
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Rebecca Jane Barthelmie D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Jane Barthelmie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120 66
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Rebecca Jane Barthelmie is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on wind energy within engineering and environmental science disciplines, integrating aspects of earth and planetary sciences.

The scientist's work spans several key fields of study:

  • Engineering
  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these broader areas, their research covers specific subfields including:

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

The main research topics addressed are:

  • Wind Energy Research and Development
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Wind and Air Flow Studies
  • Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Climate variability and models
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Energy Load and Power Forecasting

Frequent collaborators include:

  • S. C. Pryor
  • Tristan J. Shepherd
  • Frederick Letson
  • Jacob Coburn
  • Jeanie A. Aird

They have published extensively in journals such as:

  • Journal of Physics Conference Series
  • Energies
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Wind energy science
  • Climate

Selected recent papers include:

  • Climate change impacts on wind power generation, 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • A global assessment of extreme wind speeds for wind energy applications, 2021, Nature Energy
  • Wind power production from very large offshore wind farms, 2021, Joule
  • Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Wind Energy, 2021, Climate
  • Occurrence of Low-Level Jets over the Eastern U.S. Coastal Zone at Heights Relevant to Wind Energy, 2022, Energies

Best Publications

  • Analytical modelling of wind speed deficit in large offshore wind farms

    Sten Tronæs Frandsen;Rebecca Jane Barthelmie;S.C. Pryor;Ole Rathmann

  • Modelling and measuring flow and wind turbine wakes in large wind farms offshore

    Rebecca Jane Barthelmie;Kurt Schaldemose Hansen;Sten Tronæs Frandsen;Ole Rathmann

  • Climate change impacts on wind energy: A review

    S.C. Pryor;R.J. Barthelmie

  • The impact of turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability on power deficits due to wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm

    Kurt Schaldemose Hansen;Rebecca J. Barthelmie;Leo E. Jensen;Anders Sommer

  • Quantifying the Impact of Wind Turbine Wakes on Power Output at Offshore Wind Farms

    Rebecca Jane Barthelmie;Sara Pryor;Sten Tronæs Frandsen;Kurt Schaldemose Hansen

  • Comparison of Wake Model Simulations with Offshore Wind Turbine Wake Profiles Measured by Sodar

    R. J. Barthelmie;G. C. Larsen;S. T. Frandsen;L. Folkerts

  • Wind speed trends over the contiguous United States

    S. C. Pryor;R. J. Barthelmie;D. T. Young;Eugene S. Takle

  • Evaluation of wind farm efficiency and wind turbine wakes at the Nysted offshore wind farm

    Rebecca Jane Barthelmie;L.E. Jensen

  • Modelling and measurements of power losses and turbulence intensity in wind turbine wakes at Middelgrunden offshore wind farm

    R. J. Barthelmie;S. T. Frandsen;M. N. Nielsen;S. C. Pryor

  • Climate change impacts on wind power generation

    Sara C. Pryor;Rebecca J. Barthelmie;Melissa S. Bukovsky;L. Ruby Leung

  • Offshore Wind Energy in Europe— A Review of the State-of-the-Art

    Andrew R. Henderson;Colin Morgan;Bernie Smith;Hans C. Sørensen

  • Potential climate change impact on wind energy resources in northern Europe: analyses using a regional climate model

    S C Pryor;R J Barthelmie;Erik Kjellström

  • Modeling wake effects in large wind farms in complex terrain: the problem, the methods and the issues

    E.S. Politis;J. Prospathopoulos;D. Cabezon;Kurt Schaldemose Hansen

  • A review of measurement and modelling results of particle atmosphere–surface exchange

    Sara Pryor;M. Gallagher;H. Sievering;Søren Ejling Larsen

  • Wind energy research: State-of-the-art and future research directions

    D.J. Willis;C. Niezrecki;D. Kuchma;E. Hines

  • Importance of thermal effects and sea surface roughness for offshore wind resource assessment

    Bernhard Lange;Søren Larsen;Jørgen Højstrup;Rebecca Barthelmie

  • Empirical downscaling of wind speed probability distributions

    S C. Pryor;Justin T. Schoof;Justin T. Schoof;R J. Barthelmie

  • Modelling and measurements of wakes in large wind farms

    Rebecca Jane Barthelmie;Ole Rathmann;Sten Tronæs Frandsen;K. Hansen

  • Assessing climate change impacts on the near-term stability of the wind energy resource over the United States

    S. C. Pryor;R. J. Barthelmie

  • The Perdigão: Peering into Microscale Details of Mountain Winds

    H. J. S. Fernando;J. Mann;J. M. L. M. Palma;Julie K. Lundquist

  • Power deficits due to wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm

    Kurt Schaldemose Hansen;Rebecca Barthelmie;Leo E. Jensen;Anders Sommer

Frequent Co-Authors

Sara C. Pryor
Sara C. Pryor Cornell University
Søren Ejling Larsen
Søren Ejling Larsen Technical University of Denmark
Charlotte Bay Hasager
Charlotte Bay Hasager Technical University of Denmark
Gunner Chr. Larsen
Gunner Chr. Larsen Technical University of Denmark
Trevor D. Davies
Trevor D. Davies University of East Anglia
Morten Nielsen
Morten Nielsen Technical University of Denmark
Georges Kariniotakis
Georges Kariniotakis Mines ParisTech
Jakob Mann
Jakob Mann Technical University of Denmark
Erik Kjellström
Erik Kjellström Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
George Kallos
George Kallos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Environmental Sciences, understanding related online degrees can broaden career options and enhance interdisciplinary knowledge. Many professionals expand their expertise by pursuing degrees such as an online sociology bachelor program, which offers insights into societal impacts on environmental policies and community engagement.

Public administration roles are also vital to environmental advocacy, and choosing from the easiest online MPA programs can provide practical leadership skills without demanding overly lengthy commitments. This flexibility is ideal for working professionals balancing multiple responsibilities.

For those interested in educational leadership or policy-making within environmental education, advanced online programs are a great fit. Programs like EdD without dissertation requirements allow students to progress efficiently without the traditional dissertation barrier. Additionally, transitioning from EdS to EdD programs offers a clear pathway for deepening expertise and advancing academic credentials.

By integrating knowledge from these related disciplines and degree pathways, graduates can position themselves at the forefront of environmental science careers, combining scientific understanding with public policy, education, and social frameworks.

Explore these options further to find the best program that aligns with your career goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca Jane Barthelmie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles