World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 58 593 553 87 77 160 35099

Ammon Salter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ammon Salter between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ammon Salter published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2005. 4 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2005. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1998 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ammon Salter: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 6
2002 2
2003 13
2004 7
2005 16
2006 6
2007 3
2008 9
2009 2
2010 7
2011 9
2012 10
2013 8
2014 7
2015 15
2016 10
2017 8
2018 5
2019 5
2020 7
2021 8
2022 3
2023 3
2024 3
2025 1
Total 175
Download as CSV

Ammon Salter publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ammon Salter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 160–164 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 160 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74 160
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Ammon Salter D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ammon Salter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34 58
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Ammon Salter is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, Social Sciences, and Decision Sciences. Within these broader domains, Salter has contributed to subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Computer Science Applications, and Communication.

Their work centers on topics related to innovation and knowledge management, innovation policy and research and development, open source software innovations, scientometrics and bibliometrics research, knowledge management and sharing, experimental behavioral economics studies, and meta-analysis and systematic reviews.

Salter has published in several academic venues, with Research Policy and Academy of Management Proceedings being the most frequent, followed by Studies in Higher Education, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Organization Science.

Recent papers by Salter include:

  • Inbound Open Innovation and Innovation Performance: A Robustness Study (2021, Research Policy)
  • The Sequence Effect in Panel Decisions: Evidence from the Evaluation of Research and Development Projects (2021, Organization Science)
  • STEM migration, research, and innovation (2020, Research Policy)
  • Who Captures Value from Open Innovation - The Firm or Its Employees? (2020, Strategic Management Review)
  • Inside-Out, Outside-In, or All-in-One? The Role of Network Sequencing in the Elaboration of Ideas (2022, Academy of Management Journal)

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Salter has co-authored multiple publications with Paola Criscuolo, Keld Laursen, Cornelia Lawson, Rossella Salandra, and Anne L. J. Ter Wal.

  • Paola Criscuolo
  • Keld Laursen
  • Cornelia Lawson
  • Rossella Salandra
  • Anne L. J. Ter Wal

Best Publications

  • Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms

    Keld Laursen;Ammon Salter

  • Academic engagement and commercialisation : A review of the literature on university-industry relations

    Markus Perkmann;Valentina Tartari;Maureen McKelvey;Erkko Autio

  • The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review

    Ammon J. Salter;Ben R. Martin

  • Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems

    David M Gann;Ammon J Salter

  • Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration

    Johan Bruneel;Johan Bruneel;Pablo D’Este;Ammon Salter

  • Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?

    Keld Laursen;Ammon Salter

  • Open innovation: The next decade

    Joel West;Ammon Salter;Wim Vanhaverbeke;Wim Vanhaverbeke;Wim Vanhaverbeke;Henry W. Chesbrough;Henry W. Chesbrough

  • The Management of Technological Innovation: Strategy and Practice

    Mark Dodgson;David Gann;Ammon Salter

  • The Role of Technology in the Shift towards Open Innovation : The Case of Procter & Gamble

    Mark Dodgson;David Gann;Ammon Salter

  • The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration

    Keld Laursen;Keld Laursen;Ammon J. Salter

  • Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms

    Toke Reichstein;Ammon Salter

  • Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University–Industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom

    Keld Laursen;Toke Reichstein;Ammon Salter

  • The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship

    Bart Clarysse;Bart Clarysse;Valentina Tartari;Ammon Salter

  • Cui Bono? The Selective Revealing of Knowledge and Its Implications for Innovative Activity

    Oliver Alexy;Gerard George;Ammon J. Salter

  • Measuring third stream activities

    Jordi Molas-Gallart;Ammon Salter;Pari Patel;Alister Scott

  • Design Quality Indicator as a tool for thinking

    David M. Gann;Ammon J. Salter;Jennifer K. Whyte

  • Postcards from the Edge: Local Communities, Global Programs and Boundary Objects:

    Jonathan Sapsed;Ammon Salter

  • Think, Play, Do: Technology, Innovation, and Organization

    Mark Dodgson;David Gann;Ammon J. Salter

  • Coping with open innovation: responding to the challenges of external engagement in R&D

    Ammon Salter;Paola Criscuolo;Anne L.J. Ter Wal

  • Sources of ideas for innovation in engineering design

    Ammon Salter;David Gann

  • Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations

    Markus Perkmann;Valentina Tartari;Maureen McKelvey;Erkko Autio;Erkko Autio

  • The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms

    Keld Laursen;Ammon Salter

Frequent Co-Authors

David Gann
David Gann University of Oxford
Keld Laursen
Keld Laursen Copenhagen Business School
Markus Perkmann
Markus Perkmann Imperial College London
Mark Dodgson
Mark Dodgson University of Queensland
Alan Hughes
Alan Hughes Lancaster University
Linus Dahlander
Linus Dahlander European School of Management and Technology
Wim Vanhaverbeke
Wim Vanhaverbeke University of Antwerp
Aldo Geuna
Aldo Geuna University of Turin
Henry Chesbrough
Henry Chesbrough University of California, Berkeley
Maureen McKelvey
Maureen McKelvey University of Gothenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Business and Management opens doors to a wide range of online programs that can shape your career. The flexibility of online education allows you to balance learning with personal and professional commitments, making it easier to upskill or switch industries.

For those interested in finance, an accredited online accounting degree provides essential skills for roles in accounting, auditing, and financial analysis. If your passion lies with technology and innovation, the best online ai degree programs can set you on the path to thriving tech careers in data science and automation.

Emerging sectors such as construction are also accessible through tailored online study. An affordable online construction management degree equips you to lead complex building projects and manage teams with strong business principles.

For professionals aspiring to leadership, advanced programs like the executive mba programs online deliver management expertise and strategic insight designed for career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Ammon Salter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles