World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 65 7753 7033 2263 1874 293 13477

Roger E. Koeppe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roger E. Koeppe between 1951 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roger E. Koeppe published across 74 years, from 1951 to 2024, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2011. 2 of the 296 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1951 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2011. 1951: 1 publication 1952: 1 publication 1953: 2 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 1 publication 1956: 1 publication 1957: 2 publications 1958: 3 publications 1959: 5 publications 1960: 1 publication 1961: 2 publications 1962: 1 publication 1963: 1 publication 1964: 2 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 4 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 3 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1951 2024

296 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roger E. Koeppe: publications per year, 1951 to 2024
Year Publications
1951 1
1952 1
1953 2
1954 0
1955 1
1956 1
1957 2
1958 3
1959 5
1960 1
1961 2
1962 1
1963 1
1964 2
1965 0
1966 4
1967 1
1968 3
1969 2
1970 3
1971 1
1972 2
1973 3
1974 2
1975 2
1976 3
1977 2
1978 1
1979 2
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 4
1985 2
1986 5
1987 2
1988 3
1989 3
1990 5
1991 2
1992 10
1993 1
1994 6
1995 5
1996 3
1997 2
1998 3
1999 9
2000 5
2001 3
2002 3
2003 6
2004 4
2005 4
2006 5
2007 9
2008 5
2009 12
2010 12
2011 14
2012 11
2013 8
2014 8
2015 9
2016 13
2017 8
2018 12
2019 10
2020 8
2021 4
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
Total 296
Download as CSV

Roger E. Koeppe publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger E. Koeppe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 293 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939 293
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Roger E. Koeppe D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger E. Koeppe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731 65
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Roger E. Koeppe is affiliated with the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with specific expertise in molecular biology, atomic and molecular physics and optics, biomaterials, spectroscopy, and biomedical engineering.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics such as lipid membrane structure and behavior, protein structure and dynamics, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, spectroscopy and quantum chemical studies, supramolecular self-assembly in materials, advanced NMR techniques and applications, and force microscopy techniques and applications.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Roger E. Koeppe include Denise V. Greathouse, Matthew J. McKay, Fahmida Afrose, Jake R. Price, and Kelsey Anne Marr.

Their scholarly output appears predominantly in a few key publication venues, including Biophysical Journal, ACS Omega, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, FEBS Letters, and Faraday Discussions.

Recent published papers reflect ongoing interest in membrane biophysics and peptide dynamics. Notable publications include:

  • Intrinsic Lipid Curvature and Bilayer Elasticity as Regulators of Channel Function: A Comparative Single-Molecule Study, 2024, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Flanking aromatic residue competition influences transmembrane peptide helix dynamics, 2020, FEBS Letters
  • Membrane electrostatics sensed by tryptophan anchors in hydrophobic model peptides depends on non-aromatic interfacial amino acids: implications in hydrophobic mismatch, 2020, Faraday Discussions
  • Examination of pH dependency and orientation differences of membrane spanning alpha helices carrying a single or pair of buried histidine residues, 2020, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
  • Lipid-Dependent Titration of Glutamic Acid at a Bilayer Membrane Interface, 2021, ACS Omega

Best Publications

  • Bilayer Thickness and Membrane Protein Function: An Energetic Perspective

    Olaf S. Andersen;Roger E. Koeppe

  • Different Membrane Anchoring Positions of Tryptophan and Lysine in Synthetic Transmembrane α-Helical Peptides

    Maurits R.R. de Planque;John A.W. Kruijtzer;Rob M.J. Liskamp;Derek Marsh

  • Induction of nonbilayer structures in diacylphosphatidylcholine model membranes by transmembrane alpha-helical peptides: importance of hydrophobic mismatch and proposed role of tryptophans.

    J. A. Killian;I. Salemink;M. R. R. De Planque;G. Lindblom

  • Bilayer-dependent inhibition of mechanosensitive channels by neuroactive peptide enantiomers.

    Thomas M. Suchyna;Sonya E. Tape;Roger E. Koeppe;Olaf S. Andersen

  • Influence of lipid/peptide hydrophobic mismatch on the thickness of diacylphosphatidylcholine bilayers. A 2H NMR and ESR study using designed transmembrane alpha-helical peptides and gramicidin A.

    M. R. R. De Planque;D. V. Greathouse;R. E. Koeppe;H. Schafer

  • Interfacial Anchor Properties of Tryptophan Residues in Transmembrane Peptides Can Dominate over Hydrophobic Matching Effects in Peptide−Lipid Interactions†

    M.R.R. de Planque;B.B. Bonev;J.A.A. Demmers;D.V. Greathouse

  • Regulation of sodium channel function by bilayer elasticity: the importance of hydrophobic coupling. Effects of Micelle-forming amphiphiles and cholesterol.

    Jens A. Lundbaek;Jens A. Lundbaek;P. I. A. Birn;Anker J. Hansen;Rikke Søgaard

  • Molecular determinants of channel function

    O. S. Andersen;R. E. Koeppe

  • Kinetics of gramicidin channel formation in lipid bilayers: transmembrane monomer association.

    Anne M. O'Connell;Roger E. Koeppe;Olaf S. Andersen

  • Capsaicin Regulates Voltage-Dependent Sodium Channels by Altering Lipid Bilayer Elasticity

    Jens Lundbaek;P. Birn;S. E. Tape;Gilman E. S. Toombes

  • Precursors in vivo of glutamate, aspartate and their derivatives of rat brain.

    R. M. O'Neal;R. E. Koeppe

  • Sensitivity of single membrane-spanning alpha-helical peptides to hydrophobic mismatch with a lipid bilayer: effects on backbone structure, orientation, and extent of membrane incorporation.

    M.R.R. de Planque;E. Goormaghtigh;D.V. Greathouse;R.E. Koeppe Ii

  • Geometry and Intrinsic Tilt of a Tryptophan-Anchored Transmembrane α-Helix Determined by 2H NMR

    Patrick C.A. van der Wel;Erik Strandberg;J. Antoinette Killian;Roger E. Koeppe

  • Tilt Angles of Transmembrane Model Peptides in Oriented and Non-Oriented Lipid Bilayers as Determined by 2H Solid-State NMR

    Erik Strandberg;Suat Özdirekcan;Dirk T.S. Rijkers;Patrick C.A. van der Wel

  • Engineering the gramicidin channel.

    Unknown

  • Amino acid sequence modulation of gramicidin channel function: effects of tryptophan-to-phenylalanine substitutions on the single-channel conductance and duration.

    Murray D. Becker;Denise V. Greathouse;Roger E. Koeppe;Olaf S. Andersen

  • Docosahexaenoic acid alters bilayer elastic properties

    Michael J. Bruno;Roger E. Koeppe;Olaf S. Andersen

  • Hydrophobic mismatch between helices and lipid bilayers.

    Thomas M. Weiss;Patrick C.A. van der Wel;J. Antoinette Killian;Roger E. Koeppe

  • Genistein can modulate channel function by a phosphorylation-independent mechanism: importance of hydrophobic mismatch and bilayer mechanics.

    Tzyh Chang Hwang;Roger E. Koeppe;Olaf S. Andersen

  • Curcumin is a Modulator of Bilayer Material Properties

    Helgi I Ingolfsson;Roger E Koeppe;Olaf S Andersen

  • Gramicidin channels

    O.S. Andersen;R.E. Koeppe;B. Roux

Frequent Co-Authors

Olaf S. Andersen
Olaf S. Andersen Cornell University
J. Antoinette Killian
J. Antoinette Killian Utrecht University
Stanley J. Opella
Stanley J. Opella University of California, San Diego
Benoît Roux
Benoît Roux University of Chicago
Amitabha Chattopadhyay
Amitabha Chattopadhyay Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology
Robert M. Stroud
Robert M. Stroud University of California, San Francisco
John Katsaras
John Katsaras Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Göran Lindblom
Göran Lindblom Umeå University
Mark S.P. Sansom
Mark S.P. Sansom University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Chemistry in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. For instance, those interested in the legal aspects of chemistry and forensic science may consider an accredited online criminal justice associate degree. This program often integrates scientific knowledge with criminal investigation methods, providing a solid foundation for forensic careers.

Similarly, chemistry graduates looking to enter legal support roles might explore paralegal degrees. Understanding what types of paralegals make the most money helps in selecting specialties that maximize salary potential, such as intellectual property related to chemical patents.

Pharmaceutical fields also present promising pathways for chemistry graduates. Careers like pharmaceutical sales offer attractive compensation, with insights available on the pharmaceutical sales salary and growth prospects. This role combines chemical knowledge with strong communication skills to effectively promote medications and products.

For those committed to healthcare, following the outlined steps to become a pharmacist is essential. This career path leverages deep chemistry expertise to ensure safe and effective medication use, offering both rewarding professional and financial outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Roger E. Koeppe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles