World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
9338
World Ranking
17987
National Ranking
1236

Dieter Langosch publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Langosch sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 144 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Dieter Langosch D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Langosch sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dieter Langosch is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany and has a body of research primarily situated within Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work has contributed to various subfields including Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Biophysics.

The researcher's main topics of focus encompass cellular transport and secretion, protein structure and dynamics, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, lipid membrane structure and behavior, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, photosynthetic processes and mechanisms, and advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques.

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Langosch include:

  • Light-induced lipid mixing implies a causal role of lipid splay in membrane fusion (2020) in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
  • Non-canonical Shedding of TNFα by SPPL2a Is Determined by the Conformational Flexibility of Its Transmembrane Helix (2020) in iScience
  • Determining the Stoichiometry of Small Protein Oligomers Using Steady-State Fluorescence Anisotropy (2020) in Biophysical Journal
  • Proteolytically generated soluble Tweak Receptor Fn14 is a blood biomarker for γ-secretase activity (2022) in EMBO Molecular Medicine
  • Experimental determination and data-driven prediction of homotypic transmembrane domain interfaces (2020) in Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Langosch has published multiple papers in a variety of scientific venues, notably:

  • Biophysical Journal
  • Scientific Reports
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
  • iScience
  • EMBO Molecular Medicine

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Langosch include Walter Stelzer, Harald Steiner, Stefan F. Lichtenthaler, Claudia Muhle-Goll, and Gökhan Güner.

Best Publications

  • Identification of a gephyrin binding motif on the glycine receptor β subunit

    Guido Meyer;Joachim Kirsch;Heinrich Betz;Dieter Langosch

  • Conserved quaternary structure of ligand-gated ion channels: the postsynaptic glycine receptor is a pentamer.

    Dieter Langosch;Leo Thomas;Heinrich Betz

  • The atypical M2 segment of the beta subunit confers picrotoxinin resistance to inhibitory glycine receptor channels.

    I. Pribilla;T. Takagi;D. Langosch;J. Bormann

  • Identification of synaptophysin as a hexameric channel protein of the synaptic vesicle membrane.

    Leo Thomas;Klaus Hartung;Dieter Langosch;Hubert Rehm

  • Primary structure and alternative splice variants of gephyrin, a putative glycine receptor-tubulin linker protein

    P. Prior;B. Schmitt;G. Grenningloh;I. Pribilla

  • GxxxG motifs within the amyloid precursor protein transmembrane sequence are critical for the etiology of Aβ42

    Lisa-Marie Munter;Philipp Voigt;Anja Harmeier;Daniela Kaden

  • The 93-kDa glycine receptor-associated protein binds to tubulin.

    J. Kirsch;D. Langosch;P. Prior;U.Z. Littauer

  • Residues within transmembrane segment M2 determine chloride conductance of glycine receptor homo- and hetero-oligomers.

    J Bormann;N Rundström;H Betz;D Langosch

  • Dimerisation of the Glycophorin A Transmembrane Segment in Membranes Probed with the ToxR Transcription Activator

    Dieter Langosch;Bettina Brosig;Harald Kolmar;Hans-Joachim Fritz

  • The dimerization motif of the glycophorin A transmembrane segment in membranes: importance of glycine residues.

    Bettina Brosig;Dieter Langosch

  • A heptad motif of leucine residues found in membrane proteins can drive self-assembly of artificial transmembrane segments.

    Rolf Gurezka;Rico Laage;Bettina Brosig;Dieter Langosch

  • The inhibitory glycine receptor: a ligand-gated chloride channel of the central nervous system.

    Dieter Langosch;Cord‐Michael Becker;Heinrich Betz

  • Role of GxxxG Motifs in Transmembrane Domain Interactions

    Mark G. Teese;Mark G. Teese;Dieter Langosch;Dieter Langosch

  • Functions of SNAREs in intracellular membrane fusion and lipid bilayer mixing

    Christian Ungermann;Dieter Langosch

  • Decreased agonist affinity and chloride conductance of mutant glycine receptors associated with human hereditary hyperekplexia.

    D. Langosch;Bodo Laube;N. Rundström;V. Schmieden

  • Interaction of transmembrane helices by a knobs‐into‐holes packing characteristic of soluble coiled coils

    Dieter Langosch;Jaap Heringa

  • Peptide mimics of SNARE transmembrane segments drive membrane fusion depending on their conformational plasticity.

    Dieter Langosch;Jonathan M Crane;Bettina Brosig;Andrea Hellwig

  • Self assembly of the transmembrane domain promotes signal transduction through the erythropoietin receptor

    Katharina F. Kubatzky;Weiming Ruan;Rolf Gurezka;Jacob Cohen

  • Interaction and conformational dynamics of membrane-spanning protein helices

    Dieter Langosch;Isaiah T. Arkin

  • Decreased agonist affinity andchloride conductance ofmutantglycine receptors associated withhuman hereditary hyperekplexia

    Dieter Langosch;Volker Schmieden

Frequent Co-Authors

Heinrich Betz
Heinrich Betz Max Planck Society
Gerd Multhaup
Gerd Multhaup McGill University
Daniel Huster
Daniel Huster Leipzig University
Harald Steiner
Harald Steiner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Burkhard Luy
Burkhard Luy Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Dmitrij Frishman
Dmitrij Frishman Technical University of Munich
Christian Ungermann
Christian Ungermann Osnabrück University
Huub J. M. de Groot
Huub J. M. de Groot Leiden University
Cord-Michael Becker
Cord-Michael Becker University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ursula Klingmüller
Ursula Klingmüller German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an education in Biology or Biochemistry can open doors to a wide range of career paths in healthcare and science. Many students now choose flexible online options to gain practical skills and certifications that complement traditional degrees.

For those interested in technology and imaging, online rad tech programs are a cost-effective way to enter the medical imaging field. Individuals passionate about nutrition and health can consider the best dietitian programs to advance their expertise and qualify for specialized roles.

If you prefer hands-on patient care, starting with training from an online medical assisting school is a smart entry point to the healthcare workforce. Those already certified as medical assistants can further their careers through a ma to lpn bridge program, gaining advanced nursing skills entirely online.

Whether you’re just starting out or planning to expand your qualifications, these online pathways offer flexibility and valuable opportunities in the growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Dieter Langosch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles