World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
7887
World Ranking
11049
National Ranking
697

Miqing Li publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miqing Li sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 156 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Miqing Li D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miqing Li sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miqing Li is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in the field of computer science. Their work primarily focuses on advanced multi-objective optimization algorithms, metaheuristic optimization algorithms research, and evolutionary algorithms and applications.

Their research spans several subfields of computer science, notably artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, and software engineering. They have explored topics including advanced software engineering methodologies, software testing and debugging techniques, and software reliability and analysis research.

Among the recent papers authored by Miqing Li are:

  • What Weights Work for You? Adapting Weights for Any Pareto Front Shape in Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimisation (2020), published in Evolutionary Computation
  • How to Evaluate Solutions in Pareto-Based Search-Based Software Engineering: A Critical Review and Methodological Guidance (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Miqing Li has frequently collaborated with other researchers, including Xin Yao, Yi Xiang, Xiaowei Yang, Chao Bian, and Chao Qian. These collaborations have contributed to research outputs in various evolutionary computation and software engineering topics.

The scientist's work has appeared in several publication venues, with multiple contributions to arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, and the Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion.

The topics most extensively covered in their research include:

  • Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research

Miqing Li's contributions offer insights across numerous aspects of optimization within software engineering and computational intelligence, reflecting a broad engagement with both theoretical and applied challenges in computer science.

Best Publications

  • A Grid-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization

    Shengxiang Yang;Miqing Li;Xiaohui Liu;Jinhua Zheng

  • Shift-Based Density Estimation for Pareto-Based Algorithms in Many-Objective Optimization

    Miqing Li;Shengxiang Yang;Xiaohui Liu

  • A benchmark test suite for evolutionary many-objective optimization

    Ran Cheng;Miqing Li;Ye Tian;Xingyi Zhang

  • Evolutionary Multi-Objective Workflow Scheduling in Cloud

    Zhaomeng Zhu;Gongxuan Zhang;Miqing Li;Xiaohui Liu

  • A Vector Angle-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Unconstrained Many-Objective Optimization

    Yi Xiang;Yuren Zhou;Miqing Li;Zefeng Chen

  • Stable Matching-Based Selection in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

    Ke Li;Qingfu Zhang;Sam Kwong;Miqing Li

  • Quality Evaluation of Solution Sets in Multiobjective Optimisation: A Survey

    Miqing Li;Xin Yao

  • Pareto or Non-Pareto: Bi-Criterion Evolution in Multiobjective Optimization

    Miqing Li;Shengxiang Yang;Xiaohui Liu

  • Bi-goal evolution for many-objective optimization problems

    Miqing Li;Shengxiang Yang;Xiaohui Liu

  • Diversity Comparison of Pareto Front Approximations in Many-Objective Optimization

    Miqing Li;Shengxiang Yang;Xiaohui Liu

  • Diversity Assessment of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms: Performance Metric and Benchmark Problems [Research Frontier]

    Ye Tian;Ran Cheng;Xingyi Zhang;Miqing Li

  • What weights work for you?: Adapting weights for any pareto front shape in decomposition-based evolutionary multiobjective optimisation

    Miqing Li;Xin Yao

  • Achieving balance between proximity and diversity in multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

    Ke Li;Sam Kwong;Jingjing Cao;Miqing Li

  • Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization-Based Multimodal Optimization: Fitness Landscape Approximation and Peak Detection

    Ran Cheng;Miqing Li;Ke Li;Xin Yao

  • How to Read Many-Objective Solution Sets in Parallel Coordinates [Educational Forum]

    Miqing Li;Liangli Zhen;Xin Yao

  • SIP: Optimal Product Selection from Feature Models Using Many-Objective Evolutionary Optimization

    Robert M. Hierons;Miqing Li;Xiaohui Liu;Sergio Segura

  • Multi-objective evolutionary simulated annealing optimisation for mixed-model multi-robotic disassembly line balancing with interval processing time

    Yilin Fang;Yilin Fang;Hao Ming;Hao Ming;Miqing Li;Quan Liu;Quan Liu

  • An angle dominance criterion for evolutionary many-objective optimization

    Yuan Liu;Ningbo Zhu;Kenli Li;Miqing Li

  • Spread Assessment for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization

    Miqing Li;Jinhua Zheng

  • Evolutionary many-objective optimization for mixed-model disassembly line balancing with multi-robotic workstations

    Yilin Fang;Yilin Fang;Quan Liu;Quan Liu;Miqing Li;Yuanjun Laili

  • A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Algorithms for Many-Objective Optimization

    Miqing Li;Shengxiang Yang;Xiaohui Liu;Ruimin Shen

Frequent Co-Authors

Xin Yao
Xin Yao Lingnan University
Jinhua Zheng
Jinhua Zheng Xiangtan University
Shengxiang Yang
Shengxiang Yang De Montfort University
Xiaohui Liu
Xiaohui Liu Brunel University London
Yaochu Jin
Yaochu Jin Westlake University
Juan Zou
Juan Zou Xiangtan University
Xingyi Zhang
Xingyi Zhang Anhui University
Yuren Zhou
Yuren Zhou Sun Yat-sen University
Robert M. Hierons
Robert M. Hierons University of Sheffield
Hisao Ishibuchi
Hisao Ishibuchi Southern University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science education in the USA opens the door to a range of best masters degree to get options, many of which are in high demand across tech industries. Online learning platforms now offer flexible study programs that fit diverse schedules and career goals.

For those seeking a fast track to begin their tech journey, there are 1 year associate degree programs online that provide essential skills and foundational knowledge, preparing students for entry-level roles or further study. Affordability is another key factor, and prospective students can benefit from exploring the most affordable online colleges to help minimize student debt.

Additionally, not all high-quality programs have strict GPA requirements, so searching for online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa can make computer science education accessible to a wider range of students. No matter your background or budget, there are online degree pathways available to help you enter or advance in the computer science field.

Best Scientists Citing Miqing Li

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles