World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 59 3252 3077 1415 1328 137 11654

Erica E. Davis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Erica E. Davis between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Erica E. Davis published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2019. 22 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2019. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 10 publications
2002 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Erica E. Davis: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 2
2005 2
2006 8
2007 4
2008 6
2009 6
2010 11
2011 6
2012 4
2013 9
2014 10
2015 13
2016 10
2017 13
2018 8
2019 15
2020 8
2021 11
2022 7
2023 5
2024 12
2025 10
Total 181
Download as CSV

Erica E. Davis publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erica E. Davis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 135–144 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 137 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205 137
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Erica E. Davis D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erica E. Davis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162 59
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Erica E. Davis is affiliated with Lurie Children's Hospital in the United States. Their research contributions span primarily within the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. The main subfields addressed in their work include Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Immunology, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Davis has contributed to multiple topics within genetic and molecular research, with notable emphasis on:

  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Congenital Heart Defects Research
  • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • RNA Modifications and Cancer
  • Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies

Their publications have appeared frequently in specialized scientific venues, with the most recurrent being:

  • Nature Communications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • Genetics in Medicine

Davis has collaborated with several coauthors multiple times throughout their career. Frequent collaborators include Nicholas Katsanis, Farid Ullah, Kamal Khan, Georgios Kellaris, and Tahir Naeem Khan.

Several recent representative papers authored or coauthored by Davis are:

  • "A cross-disorder dosage sensitivity map of the human genome," 2022, published in Cell
  • "Acoustofluidic rotational tweezing enables high-speed contactless morphological phenotyping of zebrafish larvae," 2021, published in Nature Communications
  • "CFAP45 deficiency causes situs abnormalities and asthenospermia by disrupting an axonemal adenine nucleotide homeostasis module," 2020, published in Nature Communications
  • "Mutations in FAM50A suggest that Armfield XLID syndrome is a spliceosomopathy," 2020, published in Nature Communications
  • "A cross-disorder dosage sensitivity map of the human genome," 2021, published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • The Vertebrate Primary Cilium in Development, Homeostasis, and Disease

    Jantje M. Gerdes;Erica E. Davis;Nicholas Katsanis

  • Hypomorphic mutations in syndromic encephalocele genes are associated with Bardet-Biedl syndrome

    Carmen C Leitch;Norann A Zaghloul;Erica E Davis;Corinne Stoetzel

  • TTC21B contributes both causal and modifying alleles across the ciliopathy spectrum

    Erica E. Davis;Qi Zhang;Qin Liu;Bill H. Diplas

  • RNAi-mediated allelic trans-interaction at the imprinted Rtl1/Peg11 locus

    Erica Ellen Davis;Florian Caiment;Xavier Tordoir;Jérôme Cavaillé

  • CCDC39 is required for assembly of inner dynein arms and the dynein regulatory complex and for normal ciliary motility in humans and dogs

    Anne-Christine Merveille;Erica E Davis;Anita Becker-Heck;Anita Becker-Heck;Marie Legendre

  • The ciliary proteome database: an integrated community resource for the genetic and functional dissection of cilia.

    Adrian Gherman;Erica E Davis;Nicholas Katsanis

  • BBS10 encodes a vertebrate-specific chaperonin-like protein and is a major BBS locus.

    Corinne Stoetzel;Virginie Laurier;Erica E. Davis;Jean Muller

  • Mutations in TMEM216 perturb ciliogenesis and cause Joubert, Meckel and related syndromes

    Enza Maria Valente;Clare V Logan;Soumaya Mougou-Zerelli;Jeong Ho Lee

  • A common allele in RPGRIP1L is a modifier of retinal degeneration in ciliopathies.

    Hemant Khanna;Erica E Davis;Carlos A Murga-Zamalloa;Alejandro Estrada-Cuzcano

  • Identification of a Novel BBS Gene (BBS12) Highlights the Major Role of a Vertebrate-Specific Branch of Chaperonin-Related Proteins in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome

    Corinne Stoetzel;Jean Muller;Virginie Laurier;Erica E. Davis

  • Defects in the IFT-B Component IFT172 Cause Jeune and Mainzer-Saldino Syndromes in Humans

    Jan Halbritter;Albane A. Bizet;Miriam Schmidts;Jonathan D. Porath

  • CC2D2A Is Mutated in Joubert Syndrome and Interacts with the Ciliopathy-Associated Basal Body Protein CEP290

    Nicholas T. Gorden;Heleen H. Arts;Melissa A. Parisi;Karlien L.M. Coene

  • KIF7 mutations cause fetal hydrolethalus and acrocallosal syndromes

    Audrey Putoux;Sophie Thomas;Karlien L.M. Coene;Erica E. Davis

  • An organelle-specific protein landscape identifies novel diseases and molecular mechanisms

    Boldt K;van Reeuwijk J;Lu Q;Koutroumpas K

  • TMEM237 Is Mutated in Individuals with a Joubert Syndrome Related Disorder and Expands the Role of the TMEM Family at the Ciliary Transition Zone

    Lijia Huang;Katarzyna Szymanska;Victor L. Jensen;Andreas R. Janecke

  • ARMC4 Mutations Cause Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia with Randomization of Left/Right Body Asymmetry

    Rim Hjeij;Anna Lindstrand;Richard Francis;Maimoona A. Zariwala

  • The ciliopathies: a transitional model into systems biology of human genetic disease.

    Erica E Davis;Nicholas Katsanis

  • The Emerging Complexity of the Vertebrate Cilium: New Functional Roles for an Ancient Organelle

    Erica E. Davis;Martina Brueckner;Nicholas Katsanis

  • SMCHD1 mutations associated with a rare muscular dystrophy can also cause isolated arhinia and Bosma arhinia microphthalmia syndrome

    Natalie D. Shaw;Natalie D. Shaw;Harrison Brand;Harrison Brand;Zachary A. Kupchinsky;Hemant Bengani

  • A cross-disorder dosage sensitivity map of the human genome

    Ryan L. Collins;Ryan L. Collins;Joseph T. Glessner;Joseph T. Glessner;Eleonora Porcu;Eleonora Porcu;Lisa-Marie Niestroj

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas Katsanis
Nicholas Katsanis Galatea Bio Inc
Friedhelm Hildebrandt
Friedhelm Hildebrandt Boston Children's Hospital
Edgar A. Otto
Edgar A. Otto University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard A. Lewis
Richard A. Lewis Baylor College of Medicine
Philip L. Beales
Philip L. Beales University College London
Hélène Dollfus
Hélène Dollfus University of Strasbourg
Tania Attié-Bitach
Tania Attié-Bitach Université Paris Cité
Jean-Louis Mandel
Jean-Louis Mandel Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Colin A. Johnson
Colin A. Johnson University of Leeds
Richard A. Gibbs
Richard A. Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Genetics and related health sciences, several online degrees and certifications offer efficient pathways to career advancement. Many nursing professionals seek programs like rn to bsn without clinicals, which allow for academic growth without the need to complete additional hands-on requirements. This can be ideal for working nurses wanting flexibility in balancing education and employment.

Those aiming for the highest clinical practice roles may explore the fastest bsn to dnp program options to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in less time. Similarly, prospective students researching medical assistant certification programs can benefit from accelerated paths to entry-level healthcare positions.

Some students prioritize programs with lighter workloads. For these learners, easy dnp programs offer a less intensive route to advanced nursing credentials. Exploring these alternative educational pathways can help students map their ideal route toward careers intersecting with genetics and broader healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Erica E. Davis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles