World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
44
Citations
8143
World Ranking
1583
National Ranking
93

Robert Schaback publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Schaback sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 149 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Robert Schaback D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Schaback sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Schaback is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Mathematics, with particular emphasis on Computational Mechanics and Mechanics of Materials within these broad areas.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Numerical methods in inverse problems
  • Mathematical Approximation and Integration
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Robert Schaback has contributed to a variety of recent research papers, among them:

  • "Scaling of radial basis functions," 2023, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis
  • "The Matérn Model: A Journey Through Statistics, Numerical Analysis and Machine Learning," 2024, Statistical Science
  • "Small errors imply large evaluation instabilities," 2023, Advances in Computational Mathematics
  • "Introducing the evaluation condition number: A novel assessment of conditioning in radial basis function methods," 2024, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
  • "Modelling Recovered Cases and Death Probabilities for the COVID-19 Outbreak," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent co-authors include Emilio Porcu, Amir Noorizadegan, Moreno Bevilacqua, Chris J. Oates, and Elisabeth Larsson.

Publication venues where Robert Schaback has frequently published include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung
  • Statistical Science
  • IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis
  • Advances in Computational Mathematics

Best Publications

  • Error estimates and condition numbers for radial basis function interpolation

    Robert Schaback

  • Solving partial differential equations by collocation using radial basis functions

    C. Franke;R. Schaback

  • Local error estimates for radial basis function interpolation of scattered data

    Zong-Min Wu;Robert Schaback

  • Kernel techniques: From machine learning to meshless methods

    Robert Schaback;Holger Wendland

  • Convergence order estimates of meshless collocation methods using radial basis functions

    Carsten Franke;Robert Schaback

  • On unsymmetric collocation by radial basis functions

    Y. C. Hon;R. Schaback

  • On generalized moving least squares and diffuse derivatives

    Davoud Mirzaei;Robert Schaback;Mehdi Dehghan

  • Characterization and construction of radial basis functions

    Robert Schaback;Holger Wendland

  • Multivariate Interpolation by Polynomials and Radial Basis Functions

    Robert Schaback

  • Shape preserving properties and convergence of univariate multiquadric quasi-interpolation

    Z M Wu;R Schaback

  • Results on meshless collocation techniques

    Leevan Ling;Roland Opfer;Robert Schaback

  • Native Hilbert Spaces for Radial Basis Functions I

    Robert Schaback

  • Adaptive greedy techniques for approximate solution of large RBF systems

    Robert Schaback;Holger Wendland

  • Near-optimal data-independent point locations for radial basis function interpolation

    Stefano De Marchi;Robert Schaback;Holger Wendland

  • Improved error bounds for scattered data interpolation by radial basis functions

    R. Schaback

  • Convergence of Unsymmetric Kernel-Based Meshless Collocation Methods

    Robert Schaback

  • An Adaptive Greedy Algorithm for Solving Large RBF Collocation Problems

    Y. C. Hon;Robert Schaback;X. Zhou

  • Bases for kernel-based spaces

    Maryam Pazouki;Robert Schaback

  • Interpolation of spatial data – A stochastic or a deterministic problem?

    Michael Scheuerer;Robert Schaback;Martin Schlather

  • Direct Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (DMLPG) method: A generalized MLS approximation

    Davoud Mirzaei;Robert Schaback

Frequent Co-Authors

Holger Wendland
Holger Wendland University of Bayreuth
Benny Y.C. Hon
Benny Y.C. Hon Chinese University of Hong Kong
Francis J. Narcowich
Francis J. Narcowich Texas A&M University
Joseph D. Ward
Joseph D. Ward Texas A&M University
Mehdi Dehghan
Mehdi Dehghan Amirkabir University of Technology
Dietrich Braess
Dietrich Braess Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mathematics opens doors to a variety of career paths, many of which can be supported by additional online graduate programs. For those interested in combining quantitative skills with business acumen, exploring the fastest mba online programs can be a strategic move. These programs offer accelerated schedules, allowing professionals to enhance their credentials without lengthy interruptions to their careers.

Marketing is another field where strong analytical and mathematical skills are highly valued. Students aiming to blend these skills can consider marketing graduate programs that are both affordable and financially rewarding. These programs cater to the rising demand for data-driven marketers.

Additionally, if time is a critical factor, exploring the cheapest 1 year online mba programs can provide an efficient path to earning an advanced degree in business without substantial cost or time commitments.

For those who have previous graduate coursework, it’s worth researching whether you can you transfer credits into an mba program. Credit transfer policies vary and can significantly reduce the time and expense needed to complete an MBA, making these programs more accessible and flexible.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Schaback

Trending Scientists