World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
43
Citations
7330
World Ranking
1701
National Ranking
734

Ching-Shyang Chen publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ching-Shyang Chen sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 156 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Ching-Shyang Chen D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ching-Shyang Chen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ching-Shyang Chen is affiliated with the University of Southern Mississippi in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research activities connected to this institution.

Currently, there are no recorded recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, specific fields or subfields of study, main research topics, or awards associated with Ching-Shyang Chen in the provided data.

Given the limited available information, it is not possible to outline detailed contributions or thematic focuses in research or scholarly output for this scientist at this time.

Best Publications

  • A numerical method for heat transfer problems using collocation and radial basis functions

    M. Zerroukat;H. Power;C. S. Chen

  • Some recent results and proposals for the use of radial basis functions in the BEM

    M.A. Golberg;C.S. Chen;H. Bowman

  • Improved multiquadric approximation for partial differential equations

    M.A. Golberg;C.S. Chen;S.R. Karur

  • Discrete projection methods for integral equations

    M. A. Golberg;C. S. Chen

  • Recent Advances in Radial Basis Function Collocation Methods

    C.S. Chen;Zhuo-Jia Fu;Wen Chen

  • Some comments on the ill-conditioning of the method of fundamental solutions

    C.S. Chen;Hokwon A. Cho;M.A. Golberg

  • The method of approximate particular solutions for solving certain partial differential equations

    Ching-Shyang Chen;Chia-Ming Fan;Pihua Wen

  • On choosing the location of the sources in the MFS

    C. S. Chen;A. Karageorghis;Yan Li

  • The method of fundamental solutions for non-linear thermal explosions

    C. S. Chen

  • Dual reciprocity method using compactly supported radial basis functions

    C. S. Chen;C. A. Brebbia;H. Power

  • A comparison of efficiency and error convergence of multiquadric collocation method and finite element method

    Jichun Li;Alexander H.-D. Cheng;Ching-Shyang Chen

  • A new method of fundamental solutions applied to nonhomogeneous elliptic problems

    C. J. S. Alves;C. S. Chen

  • Some comments on the use of radial basis functions in the dual reciprocity method

    M. A. Golberg;C. S. Chen;H. Bowman;H. Power

  • Numerical comparisons of two meshless methods using radial basis functions

    Jichun Li;Y.C. Hon;C.S. Chen

  • Particular solutions of Helmholtz-type operators using higher order polyhrmonic splines

    A. S. Muleshkov;M. A. Golberg;C. S. Chen

  • The Method of Approximate Particular Solutions for Solving Elliptic Problems with Variable Coefficients

    Ching-Shyang Chen;Chia-Ming Fan;Pihua Wen

  • The method of fundamental solutions and quasi‐Monte‐Carlo method for diffusion equations

    C. S. Chen;M. A. Golberg;Y. C. Hon

  • A localized approach for the method of approximate particular solutions

    Guangming Yao;Joseph Kolibal;C. S. Chen

  • Multilevel compact radial functions based computational schemes for some elliptic problems

    C.S. Chen;M. Ganesh;M.A. Golberg;A.H.-D. Cheng

  • On the use of boundary conditions for variational formulations arising in financial mathematics

    Michael D. Marcozzi;Seungmook Choi;C. S. Chen

  • Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations

    Okey Oseloka Onyejekwe;M. F. Webster;H. R. Tamaddon-Jahromi;M. Aboubacar

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Karageorghis
Andreas Karageorghis University of Cyprus
Benny Y.C. Hon
Benny Y.C. Hon Chinese University of Hong Kong
Alexander H.-D. Cheng
Alexander H.-D. Cheng University of Mississippi
Jichun Li
Jichun Li University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Carlos Alberto Brebbia
Carlos Alberto Brebbia Wessex Institute of Technology
Zhuo-Jia Fu
Zhuo-Jia Fu Hohai University
Chein-Shan Liu
Chein-Shan Liu National Taiwan Ocean University
M.H. Aliabadi
M.H. Aliabadi Imperial College London
Božidar Šarler
Božidar Šarler University of Ljubljana
Jeng-Tzong Chen
Jeng-Tzong Chen National Taiwan Ocean University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their career options beyond a Mathematics degree, pursuing related online programs can be highly beneficial. For example, those looking to enter the business world might explore the easiest mba specialization options available. These programs often blend quantitative skills with practical business knowledge, allowing math graduates to transition smoothly into management roles.

Online education offers flexibility, especially for working professionals. Many students find the easiest mba online programs a convenient way to advance their education without disrupting their careers. These programs emphasize accessibility while maintaining quality, making them attractive for those seeking growth with minimal obstacles.

For a leadership role in academia or industry, earning a doctorate can be a game-changer. The best 1 year dba program online provides an accelerated yet affordable path towards a Doctor of Business Administration, merging research with real-world business solutions—ideal for math graduates applying analytical thinking to management challenges.

Finance is another promising career pathway connected to mathematics. Many students benefit from pursuing the cheapest online master's in finance, which offers strong quantitative training paired with financial expertise. This route is perfect for those aiming to work in investment, banking, or financial analytics.

Best Scientists Citing Ching-Shyang Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles