World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Francis J. Narcowich

Francis J. Narcowich

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
36
Citations
5262
World Ranking
2651
National Ranking
1094

Francis J. Narcowich publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francis J. Narcowich sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 104 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Francis J. Narcowich D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francis J. Narcowich sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Francis J. Narcowich is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on engineering and mathematics, with specific subfields in computational mechanics, mechanics of materials, and mathematical physics.

The scientist's recent scholarly output includes the paper titled Highly localized RBF Lagrange functions for finite difference methods on spheres, published in 2024 in BIT Numerical Mathematics. This publication contributes to the area of advanced numerical methods applied in computational mathematics.

Francis J. Narcowich's work extensively covers topics related to advanced numerical methods in computational mathematics, numerical methods in engineering, and numerical methods in inverse problems. These thematic areas reflect a strong emphasis on computational techniques and their applications in solving complex engineering and mathematical problems.

  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Numerical methods in inverse problems

The scientist has collaborated with several researchers, indicating engagement in interdisciplinary and collaborative projects. Frequent coauthors include Wolfgang Erb, Thomas Hangelbroek, C. Rieger, and J. D. Ward.

  • Wolfgang Erb
  • Thomas Hangelbroek
  • C. Rieger
  • J. D. Ward

Francis J. Narcowich has published in venues such as BIT Numerical Mathematics, suggesting a focus on computational and applied mathematics publications.

  • BIT Numerical Mathematics

Best Publications

  • Localized Tight Frames on Spheres

    Francis J. Narcowich;Pencho Petrushev;Joseph D. Ward

  • Persistency of Excitation in Identification Using Radial Basis Function Approximants

    A. J. Kurdila;Francis J. Narcowich;Joseph D. Ward

  • Spherical Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund inequalities and positive quadrature

    H. N. Mhaskar;F. J. Narcowich;J. D. Ward

  • Singularity structure of the two-point function in quantum field theory in curved spacetime, II

    S.A Fulling;F.J Narcowich;Robert M Wald

  • Exponential decay of energy of evolution equations with locally distributed damping

    G. Chen;S. A. Fulling;F. J. Narcowich;S. Sun

  • Sobolev bounds on functions with scattered zeros, with applications to radial basis function surface fitting

    Francis J. Narcowich;Joseph D. Ward;Holger Wendland

  • Generalized Hermite interpolation via matrix-valued conditionally positive definite functions

    Francis J. Narcowich;Joseph D. Ward

  • Decomposition of Besov and Triebel–Lizorkin spaces on the sphere

    F. Narcowich;P. Petrushev;J. Ward

  • Norms of inverses and condition numbers for matrices associated with scattered data

    Francis J. Narcowich;Joseph D. Ward

  • Nonstationary Wavelets on them-Sphere for Scattered Data

    Francis J. Narcowich;Joseph D. Ward

  • Scattered Data Interpolation on Spheres: Error Estimates and Locally Supported Basis Functions

    Francis J. Narcowich;Joseph D. Ward

  • Sobolev Error Estimates and a Bernstein Inequality for Scattered Data Interpolation via Radial Basis Functions

    Francis J. Narcowich;Joseph D. Ward;Holger Wendland

  • Norm estimates for the inverse of a general class of scattered-data radial-function interpolation matrices

    Francis J. Narcowich;Joseph D. Ward

  • Floquet theory and applications

    S. R. Barone;M. A. Narcowich;F. J. Narcowich

  • Necessary and sufficient conditions for a phase-space function to be a Wigner distribution.

    Francis J. Narcowich;R. F. O’Connell

  • Generalized Hermite interpolation and positive definite kernels on a Riemannian manifold

    F.J. Narcowich

  • Variational Principles and Sobolev-Type Estimates for Generalized Interpolation on a Riemannian Manifold

    N. Dyn;F. J. Narcowich;J. D. Ward

  • On Condition Numbers Associated with Radial-Function Interpolation

    F.J. Narcowich;N. Sivakumar;J.D. Ward

  • Approximation properties of zonal function networks using scattered data on the sphere

    Hrushikesh Narhar Mhaskar;Francis J. Narcowich;Joseph D. Ward

  • Direct and Inverse Sobolev Error Estimates for Scattered Data Interpolation via Spherical Basis Functions

    Francis J. Narcowich;Xingping Sun;Joseph D. Ward;Holger Wendland

  • Wavelets Associated with Periodic Basis Functions

    Francis J. Narcowich;Joseph D. Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph D. Ward
Joseph D. Ward Texas A&M University
Hrushikesh N. Mhaskar
Hrushikesh N. Mhaskar Claremont Graduate University
Holger Wendland
Holger Wendland University of Bayreuth
Robert Schaback
Robert Schaback University of Göttingen
Charles K. Chui
Charles K. Chui Hong Kong Baptist University
Richard B. Lehoucq
Richard B. Lehoucq Sandia National Laboratories
Goong Chen
Goong Chen Texas A&M University
Robert M. Wald
Robert M. Wald University of Chicago
Nira Dyn
Nira Dyn Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career options beyond pure math fields. Many students explore complementary disciplines to enhance their career potential. For instance, finance professionals often benefit from advanced analytics skills, making a cheapest online masters in finance an attractive choice for combining mathematical expertise with financial strategies.

Similarly, business leadership roles may require further qualifications. Those aiming for management positions might consider the fastest MBA online programs, which provide flexible and accelerated paths to develop essential business skills alongside mathematical knowledge.

Marketing is another field where mathematical acumen is valuable, especially in data-driven strategies and analytics. Students interested in this intersection can find competitive options via cheapest online marketing degree programs that balance cost, duration, and earning potential.

For those seeking a blend of speed and prestige, the best 1 year MBA programs offer intensive, high-impact training that complements a mathematics background, enabling professionals to transition into leadership roles swiftly.

Best Scientists Citing Francis J. Narcowich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles