World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 80 982 871 29 24 324 34786

Brian Raught publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brian Raught between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brian Raught published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 67 publications in 2023. 71 of the 390 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 67. Peak 67 publications in 2023. 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 67 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 45 publications
1994 2025

390 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brian Raught: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 4
1995 3
1996 3
1997 0
1998 3
1999 3
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 1
2004 3
2005 5
2006 4
2007 3
2008 2
2009 4
2010 8
2011 4
2012 6
2013 15
2014 6
2015 21
2016 13
2017 11
2018 20
2019 26
2020 27
2021 24
2022 24
2023 67
2024 26
2025 45
Total 390
Download as CSV

Brian Raught publications per year - data summary

  • Brian Raught, a Molecular Biology scholar from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, has 390 publications recorded across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1994 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 67 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2003, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 32 years in the span carries no publications at all (1997).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.6 per year counting only the 31 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 186 publications, 48% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1994-2004: 29 publications (2.6 per year); 2005-2015: 78 publications (7.1 per year); 2016-2025: 283 publications (28.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Brian Raught publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Raught sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 317–326 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 324 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41 324
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Brian Raught publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 53 ranges running from 47–56 to 564+ publications.
  • Brian Raught, a Molecular Biology scholar from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, records 324 publications - the 84th percentile of the discipline.
  • 84% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Brian Raught, and about 16% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 177–186 publications range, and Brian Raught ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 117–126 publications, holding 177 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 53% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 177–186 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 564 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Brian Raught D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Raught sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73 80
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Brian Raught D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 40–41 to 145+ D-Index.
  • Brian Raught, a Molecular Biology scholar from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, records 80 D-Index - the 68th percentile of the discipline.
  • 68% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Brian Raught, and about 32% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 68–69 D-Index range, and Brian Raught ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 64–65 D-Index, holding 131 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 50% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 66–67 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Brian Raught is affiliated with the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Canada. Their research spans a range of topics within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, focusing extensively on molecular and cell biology, oncology, hematology, and genetics.

Raught's recent papers include the following:

  • A proximity-dependent biotinylation map of a human cell, 2021, Nature
  • MYC protein interactors in gene transcription and cancer, 2021, Nature Reviews. Cancer
  • A SARS-CoV-2 - host proximity interactome, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • TBL1XR1 Mutations Drive Extranodal Lymphoma by Inducing a Pro-tumorigenic Memory Fate, 2020, Cell
  • The metabolic enzyme hexokinase 2 localizes to the nucleus in AML and normal haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to maintain stemness, 2022, Nature Cell Biology

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Blood
  • Cancer Research
  • Preprints.org

Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Jonathan St-Germain
  • Étienne Coyaud
  • Audrey Astori
  • Aaron D. Schimmer
  • C.H. Arrowsmith

Brian Raught's work covers key topics such as:

  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Epigenetics and DNA methylation
  • Biotin and related studies
  • Protein degradation and inhibitors
  • Genomics and chromatin dynamics
  • Acute myeloid leukemia research
  • RNA modifications and cancer

Within the fields of study, their publications are concentrated in:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Subfields with significant representation include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Oncology
  • Hematology
  • Genetics

Best Publications

  • eIF4 Initiation Factors: Effectors of mRNA Recruitment to Ribosomes and Regulators of Translation

    Anne-Claude Gingras;Brian Raught;Nahum Sonenberg

  • The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification–mass spectrometry data

    Dattatreya Mellacheruvu;Zachary Wright;Amber L. Couzens;Jean Philippe Lambert

  • Regulation of translation initiation by FRAP/mTOR

    Anne-Claude Gingras;Brian Raught;Nahum Sonenberg

  • Regulation of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation: a novel two-step mechanism

    Anne-Claude Gingras;Steven P. Gygi;Brian Raught;Roberto D. Polakiewicz

  • A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function

    Michael Costanzo;Benjamin VanderSluis;Elizabeth N. Koch;Anastasia Baryshnikova

  • Hierarchical phosphorylation of the translation inhibitor 4E-BP1

    Anne-Claude Gingras;Brian Raught;Steven P. Gygi;Steven P. Gygi;Anna Niedzwiecka

  • A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research

    Patrick G A Pedrioli;Jimmy K Eng;Robert Hubley;Mathijs Vogelzang

  • Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry

    Anne-Claude Gingras;Anne-Claude Gingras;Matthias Gstaiger;Brian Raught;Brian Raught;Ruedi Aebersold

  • Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics

    Parag Mallick;Markus Schirle;Sharon S Chen;Mark R Flory

  • The target of rapamycin (TOR) proteins

    Brian Raught;Anne-Claude Gingras;Nahum Sonenberg

  • Arsenic degrades PML or PML–RARα through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway

    Valérie Lallemand-Breitenbach;Marion Jeanne;Shirine Benhenda;Rihab Nasr

  • The mTOR/PI3K and MAPK pathways converge on eIF4B to control its phosphorylation and activity

    David Shahbazian;Philippe P Roux;Virginie Mieulet;Michael S Cohen

  • Phosphorylation of eucaryotic translation initiation factor 4B Ser422 is modulated by S6 kinases

    Brian Raught;Franck Peiretti;Anne-Claude Gingras;Mark Livingstone

  • A Dynamic Protein Interaction Landscape of the Human Centrosome-Cilium Interface.

    Gagan D. Gupta;Étienne Coyaud;João Gonçalves;Bahareh A. Mojarad

  • A PP2A Phosphatase High Density Interaction Network Identifies a Novel Striatin-interacting Phosphatase and Kinase Complex Linked to the Cerebral Cavernous Malformation 3 (CCM3) Protein

    Marilyn Goudreault;Lisa M. D'Ambrosio;Lisa M. D'Ambrosio;Michelle J. Kean;Michelle J. Kean;Michael J. Mullin

  • Nuclear PTEN controls DNA repair and sensitivity to genotoxic stress

    C. Bassi;J. Ho;T. Srikumar;Rjo J. O. Dowling

  • A Novel Functional Human Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4G

    Alessandra Gradi;Hiroaki Imataka;Yuri V. Svitkin;Eran Rom

  • miRNA-mediated deadenylation is orchestrated by GW182 through two conserved motifs that interact with CCR4–NOT

    Marc R Fabian;Maja K Cieplak;Filipp Frank;Masahiro Morita;Masahiro Morita

  • Activation of GCN2 in UV-Irradiated Cells Inhibits Translation

    Jing Deng;Heather P. Harding;Brian Raught;Anne-Claude Gingras

  • eIF4E activity is regulated at multiple levels

    Brian Raught;Anne-Claude Gingras

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne-Claude Gingras
Anne-Claude Gingras Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Linda Z. Penn
Linda Z. Penn University of Toronto
Laurence Pelletier
Laurence Pelletier Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Nahum Sonenberg
Nahum Sonenberg McGill University
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith Structural Genomics Consortium
Aaron D. Schimmer
Aaron D. Schimmer Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Paul C. Boutros
Paul C. Boutros University of California, Los Angeles
John H. Brumell
John H. Brumell University of Toronto
Alexey I. Nesvizhskii
Alexey I. Nesvizhskii University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Molecular Biology opens doors to diverse career and education options, especially for those interested in healthcare and research. Many students pursue pathways that combine flexible online learning with hands-on experience, making it easier to balance education with work or personal commitments.

For registered nurses looking to advance quickly, accelerated programs like the 6 month rn to bsn program offer a fast-track to broaden your knowledge and skills. If your goal is to become a nurse practitioner, you might wonder how long to become a nurse practitioner; many schools now provide streamlined curriculums that shorten the journey.

Bridge programs are also popular for nurses with an associate degree. The adn to np programs online allow ADN-prepared nurses to seamlessly earn an MSN and become nurse practitioners, opening further career opportunities in related scientific fields. Additionally, nurse practitioners with a doctorate can benefit by exploring dnp pmhnp salary trends to understand earning potential by state.

These online options provide flexibility and make healthcare science education more accessible, supporting varied career goals within and beyond molecular biology.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Raught

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles