World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
80
Citations
34786
World Ranking
982
National Ranking
29

Brian Raught publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Raught sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 324 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Brian Raught D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Raught sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian Raught is affiliated with the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Canada. Their research spans a range of topics within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, focusing extensively on molecular and cell biology, oncology, hematology, and genetics.

Raught's recent papers include the following:

  • A proximity-dependent biotinylation map of a human cell, 2021, Nature
  • MYC protein interactors in gene transcription and cancer, 2021, Nature Reviews. Cancer
  • A SARS-CoV-2 - host proximity interactome, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • TBL1XR1 Mutations Drive Extranodal Lymphoma by Inducing a Pro-tumorigenic Memory Fate, 2020, Cell
  • The metabolic enzyme hexokinase 2 localizes to the nucleus in AML and normal haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to maintain stemness, 2022, Nature Cell Biology

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Blood
  • Cancer Research
  • Preprints.org

Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Jonathan St-Germain
  • Étienne Coyaud
  • Audrey Astori
  • Aaron D. Schimmer
  • C.H. Arrowsmith

Brian Raught's work covers key topics such as:

  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Epigenetics and DNA methylation
  • Biotin and related studies
  • Protein degradation and inhibitors
  • Genomics and chromatin dynamics
  • Acute myeloid leukemia research
  • RNA modifications and cancer

Within the fields of study, their publications are concentrated in:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Subfields with significant representation include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Oncology
  • Hematology
  • Genetics

Best Publications

  • eIF4 Initiation Factors: Effectors of mRNA Recruitment to Ribosomes and Regulators of Translation

    Anne-Claude Gingras;Brian Raught;Nahum Sonenberg

  • The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification–mass spectrometry data

    Dattatreya Mellacheruvu;Zachary Wright;Amber L. Couzens;Jean Philippe Lambert

  • Regulation of translation initiation by FRAP/mTOR

    Anne-Claude Gingras;Brian Raught;Nahum Sonenberg

  • Regulation of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation: a novel two-step mechanism

    Anne-Claude Gingras;Steven P. Gygi;Brian Raught;Roberto D. Polakiewicz

  • A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function

    Michael Costanzo;Benjamin VanderSluis;Elizabeth N. Koch;Anastasia Baryshnikova

  • Hierarchical phosphorylation of the translation inhibitor 4E-BP1

    Anne-Claude Gingras;Brian Raught;Steven P. Gygi;Steven P. Gygi;Anna Niedzwiecka

  • A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research

    Patrick G A Pedrioli;Jimmy K Eng;Robert Hubley;Mathijs Vogelzang

  • Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry

    Anne-Claude Gingras;Anne-Claude Gingras;Matthias Gstaiger;Brian Raught;Brian Raught;Ruedi Aebersold

  • Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics

    Parag Mallick;Markus Schirle;Sharon S Chen;Mark R Flory

  • The target of rapamycin (TOR) proteins

    Brian Raught;Anne-Claude Gingras;Nahum Sonenberg

  • Arsenic degrades PML or PML–RARα through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway

    Valérie Lallemand-Breitenbach;Marion Jeanne;Shirine Benhenda;Rihab Nasr

  • The mTOR/PI3K and MAPK pathways converge on eIF4B to control its phosphorylation and activity

    David Shahbazian;Philippe P Roux;Virginie Mieulet;Michael S Cohen

  • Phosphorylation of eucaryotic translation initiation factor 4B Ser422 is modulated by S6 kinases

    Brian Raught;Franck Peiretti;Anne-Claude Gingras;Mark Livingstone

  • A Dynamic Protein Interaction Landscape of the Human Centrosome-Cilium Interface.

    Gagan D. Gupta;Étienne Coyaud;João Gonçalves;Bahareh A. Mojarad

  • A PP2A Phosphatase High Density Interaction Network Identifies a Novel Striatin-interacting Phosphatase and Kinase Complex Linked to the Cerebral Cavernous Malformation 3 (CCM3) Protein

    Marilyn Goudreault;Lisa M. D'Ambrosio;Lisa M. D'Ambrosio;Michelle J. Kean;Michelle J. Kean;Michael J. Mullin

  • Nuclear PTEN controls DNA repair and sensitivity to genotoxic stress

    C. Bassi;J. Ho;T. Srikumar;Rjo J. O. Dowling

  • A Novel Functional Human Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4G

    Alessandra Gradi;Hiroaki Imataka;Yuri V. Svitkin;Eran Rom

  • miRNA-mediated deadenylation is orchestrated by GW182 through two conserved motifs that interact with CCR4–NOT

    Marc R Fabian;Maja K Cieplak;Filipp Frank;Masahiro Morita;Masahiro Morita

  • Activation of GCN2 in UV-Irradiated Cells Inhibits Translation

    Jing Deng;Heather P. Harding;Brian Raught;Anne-Claude Gingras

  • eIF4E activity is regulated at multiple levels

    Brian Raught;Anne-Claude Gingras

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne-Claude Gingras
Anne-Claude Gingras Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Linda Z. Penn
Linda Z. Penn University of Toronto
Laurence Pelletier
Laurence Pelletier Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Nahum Sonenberg
Nahum Sonenberg McGill University
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith Structural Genomics Consortium
Aaron D. Schimmer
Aaron D. Schimmer Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Paul C. Boutros
Paul C. Boutros University of California, Los Angeles
John H. Brumell
John H. Brumell University of Toronto
Alexey I. Nesvizhskii
Alexey I. Nesvizhskii University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Molecular Biology opens doors to diverse career and education options, especially for those interested in healthcare and research. Many students pursue pathways that combine flexible online learning with hands-on experience, making it easier to balance education with work or personal commitments.

For registered nurses looking to advance quickly, accelerated programs like the 6 month rn to bsn program offer a fast-track to broaden your knowledge and skills. If your goal is to become a nurse practitioner, you might wonder how long to become a nurse practitioner; many schools now provide streamlined curriculums that shorten the journey.

Bridge programs are also popular for nurses with an associate degree. The adn to np programs online allow ADN-prepared nurses to seamlessly earn an MSN and become nurse practitioners, opening further career opportunities in related scientific fields. Additionally, nurse practitioners with a doctorate can benefit by exploring dnp pmhnp salary trends to understand earning potential by state.

These online options provide flexibility and make healthcare science education more accessible, supporting varied career goals within and beyond molecular biology.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Raught

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles