World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7882 7354 355 342 182 7289

Maaike H. Nauta publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maaike H. Nauta between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maaike H. Nauta published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2012. 13 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2012. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 1 publication
1996 2025

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maaike H. Nauta: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 2
2008 3
2009 1
2010 2
2011 6
2012 21
2013 9
2014 12
2015 11
2016 14
2017 18
2018 19
2019 13
2020 16
2021 9
2022 9
2023 10
2024 12
2025 1
Total 195
Download as CSV

Maaike H. Nauta publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maaike H. Nauta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 182 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 182
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Maaike H. Nauta D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maaike H. Nauta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maaike H. Nauta is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their work extensively covers topics including child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, digital mental health interventions, mental health research topics, attachment and relationship dynamics, mental health treatment and access, as well as maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Recent publications by Maaike H. Nauta include:

  • Research Review: Recommendations for reporting on treatment trials for child and adolescent anxiety disorders - an international consensus statement, 2020, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • A multi-method psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes, and recommendations, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • COVID-19 positive mothers are not more anxious or depressed than non COVID pregnant women during the pandemic: A pilot case-control comparison, 2020, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • Youth Psychopathology in Daily Life: Systematically Reviewed Characteristics and Potentials of Ecological Momentary Assessment Applications, 2021, Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • Therapists' characteristics associated with the (non-)use of exposure in the treatment of anxiety disorders in youth: A survey among Dutch-speaking mental health practitioners, 2020, Journal of Anxiety Disorders

The frequent co-authors they have collaborated with include:

  • Peter J. de Jong
  • Claudi Bockting
  • Yvonne Stikkelbroek
  • Rachel de Jong
  • Wiljo J.P.J. van Hout

Maaike H. Nauta commonly publishes in venues such as:

  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • PLoS ONE
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • A parent-report measure of children's anxiety: psychometric properties and comparison with child-report in a clinic and normal sample.

    Maaike H. Nauta;Agnes Scholing;Ronald M. Rapee;Maree Abbott

  • Breathing life into a manual : Flexibility and creativity with manual-based treatments

    Philip C. Kendall;Brian Chu;Andrea Gifford;Clair Hayes

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy for children with anxiety disorders in a clinical setting: no additional effect of a cognitive parent training.

    Maaike H. Nauta;Agnes Scholing;Paul M.G. Emmelkamp;Ruud B. Minderaa

  • Child versus Family Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Clinically Anxious Youth: An Efficacy and Partial Effectiveness Study.

    Denise H.M. Bodden;Susan M. Bögels;Maaike H. Nauta;Else De Haan

  • Effectiveness of CBT for children and adolescents with depression: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

    Matthijs Oud;Lars de Winter;Evelien Vermeulen-Smit;Denise Bodden

  • Effectiveness of behavioral parent training for children with ADHD in routine clinical practice: a randomized controlled study.

    Barbara J. van den Hoofdakker;Lianne van der Veen-Mulders;Sjoerd Sytema;Paul M.G. Emmelkamp

  • Types of parental involvement in CBT with anxious youth: A preliminary meta-analysis.

    Katharina Manassis;Trevor Changgun Lee;Kathryn Bennett;Xiu Yan Zhao

  • Experience sampling and ecological momentary assessment for studying the daily lives of patients with anxiety disorders: a systematic review.

    Laura C Walz;Maaike H Nauta;Marije Aan Het Rot

  • Implicit and explicit self-esteem and their reciprocal relationship with symptoms of depression and social anxiety: a longitudinal study in adolescents.

    Lonneke A. van Tuijl;Peter J. de Jong;B. Esther Sportel;Eva de Hullu

  • Co-occurrence of social anxiety and depression symptoms in adolescence: differential links with implicit and explicit self-esteem?

    de Peter Jong;B. E. Sportel;E. de Hullu;Maaike Nauta

  • Effectiveness of an emotion regulation group training for adolescents--a randomized controlled pilot study.

    H. Marieke Schuppert;Josephine Giesen-Bloo;Tonny G. van Gemert;Herman M. Wiersema

  • Internet-based behavioural activation with lay counsellor support versus online minimal psychoeducation without support for treatment of depression: a randomised controlled trial in Indonesia

    Retha Arjadi;Retha Arjadi;Maaike H Nauta;Willem F Scholte;Steven D Hollon

  • Clinical Predictors of Response to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: The Genes for Treatment (GxT) Study

    Jennifer L. Hudson;Robert Keers;Susanna Roberts;Jonathan R.I. Coleman

  • Cognitive bias modification versus CBT in reducing adolescent social anxiety: a randomized controlled trial

    B. Esther Sportel;B. Esther Sportel;Eva de Hullu;Peter J. de Jong;Maaike H. Nauta

  • A Genome-Wide Test of the Differential Susceptibility Hypothesis Reveals a Genetic Predictor of Differential Response to Psychological Treatments for Child Anxiety Disorders.

    Robert Keers;Robert Keers;Jonathan Coleman;Kathryn Jane Lester;Kathryn Jane Lester;Susanna Louise Roberts

  • Behavioral Inhibition and Attentional Control in Adolescents: Robust Relationships with Anxiety and Depression

    B. Esther Sportel;Maaike H. Nauta;Eva de Hullu;Peter J. de Jong

  • Emotion regulation training for adolescents with borderline personality disorder traits: a randomized controlled trial.

    H. Marieke Schuppert;Marieke E. Timmerman;Josephine Bloo;Tonny G. van Gemert

  • Research Review: Recommendations for reporting on treatment trials for child and adolescent anxiety disorders – an international consensus statement

    Cathy Creswell;Maaike H. Nauta;Jennifer L. Hudson;Sonja March

  • COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY AGE EFFECTS IN CHILD AND ADOLESCENT ANXIETY: AN INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DATA METAANALYSIS

    Kathryn Bennett;Katharina Manassis;Stephen D. Walter;Amy Cheung

  • Behavioral Parent Training as an Adjunct to Routine Care in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Moderators of Treatment Response

    Barbara J. van den Hoofdakker;Maaike H. Nauta;Lianne van der Veen-Mulders;Sjoerd Sytema

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudi L H Bockting
Claudi L H Bockting University of Amsterdam
Peter J. de Jong
Peter J. de Jong University of Groningen
Paul M. G. Emmelkamp
Paul M. G. Emmelkamp University of Amsterdam
Catharina A. Hartman
Catharina A. Hartman University Medical Center Groningen
Jennifer L. Hudson
Jennifer L. Hudson University of New South Wales
Kathryn J. Lester
Kathryn J. Lester University of Sussex
Ronald M. Rapee
Ronald M. Rapee Macquarie University
Wendy K. Silverman
Wendy K. Silverman Yale University
Susan M. Bögels
Susan M. Bögels University of Amsterdam
Thalia C. Eley
Thalia C. Eley King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a range of specialized career opportunities. For those considering advanced education, understanding jobs with masters in psychology can highlight diverse roles in counseling, human resources, and mental health services.

Online programs also allow students to focus on high-demand niches. For example, pursuing forensic psychology qualifies graduates for unique positions in legal, criminal justice, and rehabilitation settings. To learn more, check out what jobs can you get with a masters in forensic psychology.

Another growth area is industrial-organizational psychology. These specialists apply psychological insights to improve workplace performance, employee well-being, and organizational effectiveness. Learn about various opportunities by reading what jobs can you get with a masters in industrial organizational psychology.

For those interested in broader social dynamics, a master’s in sociology may also pave the way to careers in research, policy analysis, and social advocacy. Curious about potential rewards? Discover more with this resource on masters degree sociology salary.

Best Scientists Citing Maaike H. Nauta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles