World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
6362
World Ranking
18504
National Ranking
7551

Tomasz Heyduk publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomasz Heyduk sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 102 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Tomasz Heyduk D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomasz Heyduk sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tomasz Heyduk is affiliated with Saint Louis University in the United States. Their research contributions focus primarily on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, encompassing six publications in these fields. The subfields addressed in their work include molecular biology, cell biology, physiology, and biophysics.

The scientist's research topics cover multiple areas related to RNA and cellular stress mechanisms. These include:

  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Cancer-related gene regulation
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
  • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

Tomasz Heyduk has published in notable scientific journals such as:

  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • ChemBioChem

Two recent papers exemplify their research focus and outputs:

  • "TDP-43 Oligomerization and Phase Separation Properties Are Necessary for Autoregulation", 2022, published in Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "Bioorthogonal Chemistry Enables Single-Molecule FRET Measurements of Catalytically Active Protein Disulfide Isomerase", 2020, published in ChemBioChem

Collaboration has been an aspect of their research efforts, working alongside frequent coauthors including Lydia C. Koehler, Zachary R. Grese, Alliny C.S. Bastos, Lohany D. Mamede, and Yuna M. Ayala.

Best Publications

  • Transcription Activation at Class II CAP-Dependent Promoters: Two Interactions between CAP and RNA Polymerase

    Wei Niu;Younggyu Kim;Gregory Tau;Tomasz Heyduk

  • Molecular beacons for detecting DNA binding proteins.

    Tomasz Heyduk;Ewa Heyduk

  • Measuring protein conformational changes by FRET/LRET.

    Tomasz Heyduk

  • Application of fluorescence energy transfer and polarization to monitor Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein and lac promoter interaction

    Tomasz Heyduk;James C. Lee

  • Nucleic acid-based fluorescence sensors for detecting proteins.

    Ewa Heyduk;Tomasz Heyduk

  • Fluorescence anisotropy: Rapid, quantitative assay for protein-DNA and protein-protein interaction

    Tomasz Heyduk;Yuexing Ma;Hong Tang;Richard H. Ebright

  • A Role for Interaction of the RNA Polymerase Flap Domain with the σ Subunit in Promoter Recognition

    Konstantin Kuznedelov;Leonid Minakhin;Anita Niedziela-Majka;Simon L. Dove

  • Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein: evidence for three protein conformational states with different promoter binding affinities.

    Tomasz Heyduk;James C. Lee

  • Mapping protein domains involved in macromolecular interactions: a novel protein footprinting approach.

    Ewa Heyduk;Tomasz Heyduk

  • Core RNA Polymerase from E. coli Induces a Major Change in the Domain Arrangement of the σ70 Subunit

    Sandhya Callaci;Ewa Heyduk;Tomasz Heyduk

  • Thiol-reactive, luminescent Europium chelates: luminescence probes for resonance energy transfer distance measurements in biomolecules.

    Ewa Heyduk;Tomasz Heyduk

  • CAP interacts with RNA polymerase in solution in the absence of promoter DNA

    Tomasz Heyduk;Tomasz Heyduk;James C. Lee;Yon W. Ebright;Erich E. Blatter

  • A Coiled-Coil from the RNA Polymerase β′ Subunit Allosterically Induces Selective Nontemplate Strand Binding by σ70

    Brian A. Young;Larry C. Anthony;Tanja M. Gruber;Terrance M. Arthur

  • Zinc inhibition of cAMP signaling.

    Claudette Klein;Roger K. Sunahara;Tracie Y. Hudson;Tomasz Heyduk

  • Determinants of RNA polymerase alpha subunit for interaction with beta, beta', and sigma subunits: hydroxyl-radical protein footprinting

    Tomasz Heyduk;Ewa Heyduk;Konstantin Severinov;Hong Tang

  • Phosphorylation Site Mutations in Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) Reduce or Eliminate Silencing Activity

    Tao Zhao;Tomasz Heyduk;Joel C. Eissenberg

  • Molecular pincers: antibody-based homogeneous protein sensors.

    Ewa Heyduk;Benjamin Dummit;Yie-Hwa Chang;Tomasz Heyduk

  • A basal promoter element recognized by free RNA polymerase σ subunit determines promoter recognition by RNA polymerase holoenzyme

    Andrey Feklistov;Nataliya Barinova;Anastasiya Sevostyanova;Ewa Heyduk

  • Conformational Changes of DNA Induced by Binding ofChironomus High Mobility Group Protein 1a (cHMG1a) REGIONS FLANKING AN HMG1 BOX DOMAIN DO NOT INFLUENCE THE BEND ANGLE OF THE DNA

    Ewa Heyduk;Tomasz Heyduk;Peter Claus;Jacek R. Wiśniewski

  • Mapping Protein Domains Involved in Macromolecular Interactions: A Novel Protein Footprinting Approach. [Erratum to document cited in CA121:103552]

    Ewa Heyduk;Tomasz Heyduk

Frequent Co-Authors

Konstantin Severinov
Konstantin Severinov Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Richard H. Ebright
Richard H. Ebright Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jacek R. Wiśniewski
Jacek R. Wiśniewski Max Planck Society
James Lee
James Lee The Francis Crick Institute
Richard R. Burgess
Richard R. Burgess University of Wisconsin–Madison
Hong Tang
Hong Tang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jörn Bullerdiek
Jörn Bullerdiek University of Bremen
Ann Hochschild
Ann Hochschild Harvard University
Seth A. Darst
Seth A. Darst Rockefeller University
Roger K. Sunahara
Roger K. Sunahara University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring biology and biochemistry can open up various specialized fields, many of which now offer flexible online options. Students interested in healthcare, research, or fitness can advance their careers through targeted degrees and certifications.

For those drawn to pharmacy, pursuing a best online pharmacy school can lead to high-paying, impactful roles in pharmaceutical care and research. If promoting physical health is your goal, an online bachelor's degree in exercise science offers a pathway to careers in athletic training, coaching, and wellness consulting.

Kinesiology is another exciting option. Earning a kinesiology online degree can prepare you for roles in movement science or rehabilitation therapy. For advanced nursing professionals seeking rapid career advancement, consider enrolling in one of the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

Online programs make it easier than ever to gain specialized expertise, balance work and study, and enter thriving sectors linked to biology and biochemistry. Explore these flexible degree paths to find the right fit for your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Tomasz Heyduk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles