World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7173 6688 3881 3527 142 9628

John C. Gibbs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John C. Gibbs between 1959 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John C. Gibbs published across 66 years, from 1959 to 2024, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2019. 4 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2019. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 7 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 20 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication
1959 2024

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John C. Gibbs: publications per year, 1959 to 2024
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 2
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 4
1981 2
1982 4
1983 3
1984 8
1985 3
1986 3
1987 4
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 6
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 3
1996 8
1997 3
1998 3
1999 4
2000 1
2001 7
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 4
2009 3
2010 6
2011 2
2012 4
2013 15
2014 2
2015 11
2016 5
2017 2
2018 1
2019 20
2020 1
2021 3
2022 1
2023 3
2024 1
Total 174
Download as CSV

John C. Gibbs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Gibbs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 142
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John C. Gibbs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Gibbs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John C. Gibbs is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with particular emphasis on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Social Psychology.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Ego Development and Educational Practices

Their recent publications encompass a variety of subjects related to moral judgment, social behavior, and adolescent development. Notable papers include:

  • "Transformation vs Tradition: Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for Arts and Humanities," 2023, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Gender Differences in Moral Judgment and Behavior," 2021, published in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology
  • "Assessing Moral Judgment Maturity Using the Sociomoral Reflection Measure - Short Form Objective," 2021, published in European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  • "Moral judgment, self-serving cognitive distortions, and peer bullying among secondary school adolescents," 2023, published in Journal of Moral Education
  • "Stages of Adolescent Moral Development," 2020, published in The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development

Frequent co-authors in Gibbs's work include Daniël Brugman, Marinus G. C. J. Beerthuizen, Petra Helmond, Karen S. Basinger, and Kevin van der Meulen.

Publications by Gibbs have appeared in a diverse set of venues such as the European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Journal of Moral Education, arXiv (Cornell University), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology, and The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development.

Best Publications

  • A Longitudinal Study of Moral Judgment

    Unknown

  • Social Intelligence

    Unknown

  • The moral judgment of juvenile delinquents: a meta-analysis.

    Geert Jan Stams;Daniel Brugman;Maja Deković;Lenny van Rosmalen

  • Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion.

    Marvin W. Berkowitz;John C. Gibbs

  • Aggression replacement training : a comprehensive intervention for aggressive youth

    Arnold P. Goldstein;Barry Glick;John C. Gibbs

  • Moral Development and Reality: Beyond the Theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman

    John C. Gibbs

  • Moral Judgment Development across Cultures: Revisiting Kohlberg's Universality Claims.

    John C. Gibbs;Karen S. Basinger;Rebecca L. Grime;John R. Snarey

  • Parents' Use of Inductive Discipline: Relations to Children's Empathy and Prosocial Behavior

    Julia Krevans;John C. Gibbs

  • Moral Maturity: Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection

    John C. Gibbs;Karen S. Basinger;Dick Fuller

  • Moral Cognition: Explaining the Gender Difference in Antisocial Behavior

    Alvaro Q. Barriga;Elizabeth M. Morrison;Albert K. Liau;John C. Gibbs

  • Cognitive Distortion and Problem Behaviors in Adolescents

    Alvaro Q. Barriga;Jennifer R. Landau;Bobby L. Stinson;Albert K. Liau

  • The EQUIP Program. Teaching Youth To Think and Act Responsibly through a Peer-Helping Approach.

    John C. Gibbs;Granville Bud Potter;Arnold P. Goldstein

  • THE RELATION OF MORAL JUDGMENT STAGE DISPARITY TO DEVELOPMENTAL EFFECTS OF PEER DIALOGUES

    Marvin W. Berkowitz;John C. Gibbs

  • Social Intelligence Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection

    John C. Gibbs;Keith F. Widaman;Anne Colby

  • Parents' Use of Inductive Discipline: Relations to Children's Empathy and Prosocial Behavior

    Unknown

  • The meaning of ecologically oriented inquiry in contemporary psychology.

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of a multi‐component group treatment program for juvenile delinquents

    Leonard W. Leeman;John C. Gibbs;Dick Fuller

  • Moral development "versus" socialization: A critique.

    John C. Gibbs;Steven V. Schnell

  • Measuring cognitive distortion in antisocial youth: Development and preliminary validation of the “how I think” questionnaire

    Unknown

  • Moral development and reality : beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt

    John C. Gibbs

  • Moral Development and Recidivism: A Meta-Analysis

    Eveline Van Vugt;John Gibbs;Geert Jan Stams;Catrien Bijleveld

  • Developing the helping skills and prosocial motivation of aggressive adolescents in peer group programs

    John C. Gibbs;Granville Bud Potter;Alvaro Q. Barriga;Albert K. Liau

  • Kohlberg's moral stage theory: a Piagetian revision.

    John C. Gibbs

  • Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Judgment: A Constructive Critique

    John C. Gibbs

  • A meta-analysis on cognitive distortions and externalizing problem behavior associations, moderators, and treatment effectiveness

    Petra Helmond;Geertjan Overbeek;Daniel Brugman;John C. Gibbs

Frequent Co-Authors

Henri Chabrol
Henri Chabrol Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Geert Jan J. M. Stams
Geert Jan J. M. Stams University of Amsterdam
Rachel F. Rodgers
Rachel F. Rodgers Northeastern University
Keith F. Widaman
Keith F. Widaman University of California, Riverside
Geertjan Overbeek
Geertjan Overbeek University of Amsterdam
Jessica J. Asscher
Jessica J. Asscher University of Amsterdam
John T. Chibnall
John T. Chibnall Saint Louis University
Maja Deković
Maja Deković Utrecht University
Michael W. Vasey
Michael W. Vasey The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career options, particularly in counseling and mental health services. Many students choose to pursue online degrees as a flexible alternative to traditional campus programs, allowing them to balance studies with work or family commitments.

One of the most common career paths for psychology graduates is becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). However, requirements for LPC licensure vary by state. For example, to understand how to get an lpc license in Louisiana, you must review specific coursework, supervised experience, and testing requirements unique to that state.

Similarly, aspiring counselors will need to investigate the lpc license requirements in Maine, lpc license requirements in Maryland, and lpc licensure requirements in Massachusetts before beginning their journey.

In summary, understanding online degree options and carefully researching licensing requirements for your intended state is crucial in building a successful psychology career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Gibbs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles