World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 61 1380 1230 647 568 268 11355

Brenda M. Booth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brenda M. Booth between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brenda M. Booth published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2009. 5 of the 279 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2009. 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1984 2025

279 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brenda M. Booth: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 3
1985 4
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 4
1992 11
1993 5
1994 8
1995 2
1996 3
1997 5
1998 9
1999 3
2000 8
2001 9
2002 6
2003 8
2004 4
2005 4
2006 11
2007 16
2008 12
2009 18
2010 14
2011 17
2012 11
2013 11
2014 17
2015 18
2016 8
2017 10
2018 3
2019 5
2020 0
2021 1
2022 2
2023 0
2024 3
2025 2
Total 279
Download as CSV

Brenda M. Booth publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda M. Booth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 264–273 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 268 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138 268
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Brenda M. Booth D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda M. Booth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86 61
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Brenda M. Booth is affiliated with the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant work in epidemiology, rehabilitation, public health, family practice, and geriatrics and gerontology.

The scientist's recent publication record includes a variety of topics related to stroke rehabilitation, acute ischemic stroke management, telemedicine, medication adherence, pharmaceutical practices, blood pressure studies, and substance abuse treatment outcomes.

Key topics in their research include:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Brenda M. Booth's recent papers cover multiple aspects of stroke care, medication understanding, and behavior regarding drug treatments. Notable works include:

  • "A mixed-methods feasibility study of a new digital health support package for people after stroke: the Recovery-focused Community support to Avoid readmissions and improve Participation after Stroke (ReCAPS) intervention," 2022, published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • "Understanding of medications and associations with adherence, unmet needs, and perceived control of risk factors at two years post-stroke," 2022, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
  • "How to Work Effectively With Stroke Survivors Throughout the Research Process," 2024, Stroke
  • "Beliefs and attitudes regarding drug treatment: Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in African-American cocaine users," 2020, UNC Libraries
  • "Statistical analysis plan for the Recovery-focused Community support to Avoid readmissions and improve Participation after Stroke randomised controlled clinical trial," 2024, Trials

The scientist collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Jan Cameron
  • Monique F. Kilkenny
  • Amanda G. Thrift
  • Natasha A. Lannin
  • Nadine E. Andrew

Publication venues where Brenda M. Booth has contributed most recently include:

  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
  • Stroke
  • UNC Libraries
  • Trials

Best Publications

  • Medication noncompliance and substance abuse among patients with schizophrenia.

    Richard R. Owen;Ellen P. Fischer;Brenda M. Booth;Brian J. Cuffel

  • A Re-conceptualization of Access for 21st Century Healthcare

    John C. Fortney;James F. Burgess;James F. Burgess;Hayden B. Bosworth;Hayden B. Bosworth;Brenda M. Booth

  • Factors associated with women's risk of rape in the military environment†

    Anne G. Sadler;Brenda M. Booth;Brian L. Cook;Bradley N. Doebbeling

  • Health-related consequences of physical and sexual violence: Women in the military

    A. G. Sadler;B. M. Booth;D. Nielson;Bradley Doebbeling

  • Videofluoroscopic predictors of aspiration in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia

    Adrienne L. Perlman;B. M. Booth;B. M. Booth;J. P. Grayhack

  • Social support and outcome of alcoholism treatment: an exploratory analysis.

    Brenda M. Booth;Daniel W. Russell;Susan Soucek;Philip R. Laughlin

  • The Effects of Travel Barriers and Age on the Utilization of Alcoholism Treatment Aftercare

    J C Fortney;B M Booth;F C Blow;J Y Bunn

  • Life span and repeated violence against women during military service: Effects on health status and outpatient utilization

    Anne G. Sadler;Brenda M. Booth;Michelle A. Mengeling;Bradley N. Doebbeling

  • Personality, social networks, and perceived social support among alcoholics: a structural equation analysis.

    Daniel W. Russell;Brenda Booth;David Reed;Philip R. Laughlin

  • Factors associated with perceived stigma for alcohol use and treatment among at-risk drinkers.

    John Fortney;Snigdha Mukherjee;Geoffrey Curran;Stacy Fortney

  • The kindling hypothesis: further evidence from a U.S. national study of alcoholic men.

    Brenda M. Booth;Frederic C. Blow

  • Violent reinjury and mortality among youth seeking emergency department care for assault-related injury: a 2-year prospective cohort study

    Rebecca M. Cunningham;Patrick M. Carter;Megan Ranney;Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Rural, suburban, and urban variations in alcohol consumption in the United States: findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

    Tyrone F. Borders;Brenda M. Booth

  • Patient factors predicting early alcohol-related readmissions for alcoholics: role of alcoholism severity and psychiatric co-morbidity.

    Brenda M. Booth;William R. Yates;Frederick Petty;Keith Brown

  • Rural at-risk drinkers: correlates and one-year use of alcoholism treatment services.

    Brenda M. Booth;Joann Kirchner;John Fortney;Robin Ross

  • Depression after alcohol treatment as a risk factor for relapse among male veterans.

    Geoffrey M Curran;Heather A Flynn;JoAnn Kirchner;Brenda M Booth

  • Descriptive and predictive validity of a high-risk alcoholism relapse model.

    W R Yates;B M Booth;D A Reed;K Brown

  • Who seeks care where? Utilization of mental health and substance use disorder treatment in two national samples of individuals with alcohol use disorders.

    Mark J. Edlund;Brenda M. Booth;Xiaotong Han

  • Correlates of Rural Methamphetamine and Cocaine Users: Results From a Multistate Community Study

    Brenda M. Booth;Carl G. Leukefeld;Russel S. Falck;Jichuan Wang

  • Perceived need for treatment for alcohol use disorders: results from two national surveys.

    Mark J. Edlund;Brenda M. Booth;Zachary L. Feldman

Frequent Co-Authors

Maureen A. Walton
Maureen A. Walton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Frederic C. Blow
Frederic C. Blow University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephen T. Chermack
Stephen T. Chermack University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Carl G. Leukefeld
Carl G. Leukefeld University of Kentucky
Rebecca M. Cunningham
Rebecca M. Cunningham University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert G. Carlson
Robert G. Carlson Wright State University
James C. Torner
James C. Torner University of Iowa
Russel S. Falck
Russel S. Falck Wright State University
Jichuan Wang
Jichuan Wang George Washington University
Marc A. Zimmerman
Marc A. Zimmerman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a wide array of online degree options and career pathways. Many students choose flexible online degrees to balance other commitments while advancing their education.

For those interested in mental health or counseling, getting a masters in psychology is a popular route. This degree can lead to roles in clinical settings, research, or human resources. Accelerated online programs have also made it easier to complete your studies quickly. Learn more about the options through accelerated online programs that help students graduate sooner and enter the workforce faster.

Those seeking teaching or administrative positions may consider accelerated doctoral programs in education online. A doctorate can open doors to higher education leadership or research roles.

If efficiency is your goal, there are also masters programs online that can be completed in as little as one year, making it possible to quickly acquire in-depth knowledge and advance your career.

Best Scientists Citing Brenda M. Booth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles